The Ninth Circuit issued an en banc decision that overruled previous decisions to the extent that they conflicted with the plain text reading of the regulations governing internal relocation and deferral of removal under CAT. The court held that neither the petitioner nor the government bears the burden of proof as to internal relocation; rather, such evidence, if relevant, must be considered in assessing whether it is more likely than not that the petitioner would be tortured if removed.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: 9th circuit court of appeals, CAT, Convention Against Torture, internal relocation, Petition for Review |
Leave a Reply