The Ninth Circuit issued an en banc decision that overruled previous decisions to the extent that they conflicted with the plain text reading of the regulations governing internal relocation and deferral of removal under CAT. The court held that neither the petitioner nor the government bears the burden of proof as to internal relocation; rather, such evidence, if relevant, must be considered in assessing whether it is more likely than not that the petitioner would be tortured if removed.
Court Reverses Denial of CAT Relief Based on Internal Relocation Regulations
Related Posts
The Supreme Court ruled that immigrants who fear torture can appeal their deportations in federal appeals court.
In a 7-2 decision on June 1, the Supreme Court ruled against the Trump administration, holding that immigrants slated for deportation have a right to judicial…
Court Says Persons Who Publicly Provide Assistance Against Major Salvadoran Gangs Are a Particular Social Group
The Third Circuit held that people who publicly provide assistance against major Salvadoran gangs constitute a particular social group (PSG) and that the BIA erred in applying Myrie…
Court Says Stop-Time Rule Is Triggered by One Complete NTA, Not a Combination of Documents
Granting the petition for review, the 10th Circuit held that, given the unambiguous statutory language for the stop-time rule and Notices to Appear (NTAs), the stop-time rule…
USCIS Acting Director Instructs Asylum Officers to Consider Possibility of Internal Relocation in Home Country for Credible Fear Screenings and Determinations
The acting director of USCIS sent a message to asylum officers instructing them to elicit testimony for credible fear screenings to determine whether asylum seekers who provide…
Court Upholds BIA Reversal of IJ Grant of CAT Deferral to Domestic Violence Victim
Court Upholds BIA Reversal of IJ Grant of CAT Deferral to Domestic Violence Victim The First Circuit denied the petition for review and held the BIA…