The Sixth Circuit denied the petition for review of the application for withholding of removal, holding that the Mexican petitioner’s proposed social group—”persons who are perceived to have money or access to money due to having spent a significant amount of time in and having familial ties to the United States”—was not cognizable under the INA.
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/withholding-of-removal/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/withholding/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/applications-for-withholding-of-removal/
https://californiaimmigration.us/getting-persecuted-get-a-deportation-lawyers-los-angeles/
Filed under: Immigration Attorney, withholding of removal | Tagged: asylum, Withholding, withholding of removal | Leave a comment »
