Whether a fundamental change has occurred to rebut past persecution for withholding of removal is a fact-specific inquiry, tailored to the petitioner’s claim. It is insufficient to rely on information about general country changes. (Imelda v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 7/12/10).
Tags:Brian D. LernerImmigration AttorneyImmigration LawyerLaw Offices of Brian D. LernerRebut Past Persecutionwithholding of removal
Home » Immigration Updates » To rebut past persecution for withholding of removal
To rebut past persecution for withholding of removal
Related Posts
The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) issued an interim final rule to require travelers from Visa Waiver Program (VWP) countries to pay operational and…
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a final rule expanding the list of dependents who are eligible for employment authorization to include any other…
List of Student and Exchange Visitor Program Approved Schools
On 08/4/10, ICE updated its list of Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) approved schools. Student and exchange visitor program Updated list of student and…
Summary of a teleconference for H-2A petitioners on prohibited fees
USCIS released the summary of a teleconference for H-2A petitioners on prohibited fees. The summary includes information about H-2A regulations on prohibited fees, how USCIS…
H-2B Cap Count for FY2011
As of 7/30/10, USCIS receipted 3,116 H-2B petitions, including approved and pending, toward the 33,000 H-2B cap amount for the first half of the fiscal…