ARB finds that receipt of money draws under partnership agreement did not constitute payment of wages for LCA purposes, and failure to pay was willful.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, LCA, Partnership Agreement, USCIS | Tagged: Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, LCA, Partnership Agreement, USCIS | Leave a comment »
ARB finds that receipt of money draws under partnership agreement did not constitute payment of wages for LCA purposes, and failure to pay was willful.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, LCA, Partnership Agreement, USCIS | Tagged: Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, LCA, Partnership Agreement, USCIS | Leave a comment »
ACCU Staffing Group in Cherry Hill, N.J. is the first New Jersey business to become a member of the ICE Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers (IMAGE) program.
Filed under: ICE Mutual Agreement, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, New Jersey, USCIS | Tagged: ICE Mutual Agreement, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, New Jersey, USCIS | Leave a comment »
Filed under: Employer-Employee/Third-Party, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, los angeles immigration attorney, USCIS | Tagged: employer-employee/third-party, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, los angeles immigration attorney, USCIS | Leave a comment »
The offense of delivery of a simulated controlled substance in violation of Texas law is not an aggravated felony, as defined by section 101(a)(43)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B) (2006), but it is a violation of a law relating to a controlled substance under former section 241(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(2)(B)(i) (1994).
Filed under: controlled substance, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, los angeles immigration attorney, USCIS | Tagged: aggravated felony, controlled substance, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, USCIS | Leave a comment »
The new case to look at re: divisibility of criminal statutes in Immigration Court proceedings is Nijawan vs. Holder, 129 S. Ct. 2294
Filed under: Criminal statutes, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Court Proceedings, Immigration Lawyer, USCIS | Tagged: criminal statutes, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Court Proceedings, Immigration Lawyer, USCIS | Leave a comment »
For sexual abuse of a minor, the minor must be under 16 AND there must be a 4 year difference between the perpetrator and victim
Filed under: Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, los angeles immigration attorney, Sexual Abuse of a Minor, USCIS | Tagged: age difference, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, sexual abuse of a minor, USCIS | Leave a comment »
On the CSPA, if the age has locked in, then actual petition can be filed after age-out
Filed under: Aged-out, cspa, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, USCIS | Tagged: Aged-out, cspa, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, USCIS | 6 Comments »
CSPA applies when an I-130 is filed for : 1) Child of an LPR under 18 years old; 2) Parent is a USC (by birth or naturalization); 3) Parent has legal and physical custody and 4) child is residing in the U.S.; 5) the child is under 18 when the parent naturalizes. You can see specifics at section 320(a)
Filed under: cspa, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, los angeles immigration attorney, USCIS | Tagged: cspa, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, los angeles immigration attorney, USCIS | Leave a comment »
A Step-Child need not prove any bona-fides at all with the Step-Parent when filing a petition.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, Stepchild, Stepparent, USCIS | Tagged: Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, Step-Child, Step-Parent, USCIS | Leave a comment »
Immigration Lawyer
Brian D. Lerner Immigration Attorney & Deportation Lawyer Blog 