• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

I waited 15 years and now my petitioner died. Now what?

I waited 15 years and now my petitioner died. Now what?

(For a Video on this subject, please goto http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yJ_ryMCGNU&feature=g-upl)

Question: My father petitioned me 15 years ago and it was just about current, but he just died. Now, what happens and can I still come to the U.S.?

Answer: Normally, when the petitioner dies so does the petition. Thus, when you would receive a packet from the National Visa Center stating that the visa petition is ready to process, you would not be able to proceed forward. They simply do not know that the petitioner has died. However, there is what is known as a Humanitarian Reinstatement.

Question: What is a Humanitarian Reinstatement?

Answer: As I have stated, the death of a petition formerly resulted in the automatic revocation of a family member’s petition. Under the Humanitarian Reinstatement, there are procedures for permitting family members in family-based and employment-based petitions to continue with their residency applications even if the applications had not yet been approved.

Question: What is the criteria for the Humanitarian Reinstatement?

Answer: Humanitarian Reinstatement Criteria—Under prior law if there was automatic revocation of the petition due to death, USCIS/DOS could grant humanitarian reinstatement. DOS criteria in evaluating a request for humanitarian reinstatement include whether there is: (1) disruption of an established family unit; (2) hardship to USCs or LPRs; (3) a beneficiary who is elderly or in poor health; (4) a beneficiary who has had lengthy residence in the U.S.; (5) a beneficiary who has no home to go to; (6) undue delay by INS or consular officers in processing the petition and the visa; and (7) a beneficiary who has strong family ties in the U.S.

Question: I heard something about a ‘substitute sponsor’. What is this?

Answer: This is a certain other family member who basically now would submit the affidavit of support in place of the deceased petitioner. Under the Family Sponsor Immigration Act of 2002, certain relatives (spouse, parent, mother-in-law, father-in-law, sibling, child (if at least 18 years of age), son, daughter, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, sister-in-law, brother -in-law, grandparent, grandchild, or legal guardian) may be substituted to meet the affidavit of support requirements under INA §213A(f)(5), when the petitioning relative has died.

Question: Who is asked to reinstate the I-130.

Answer: The I-130 beneficiary must ask the Attorney General to reinstate the petition and must demonstrate that she has a substitute sponsor.

Question: What if you cannot find or do not have a substitute sponsor?

Answer: If a beneficiary does not have a qualifying relative, he or she may make an estoppel argument.

If the Humanitarian Reinstatement is granted, then the same priority date will be used and the petition will go forward as if the petitioner were still alive.

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/petitioner/

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/petitioner-income/

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/h-petitioner/

https://californiaimmigration.us/court-denies-immigrant-asylum-petitioner-to-us/

How Petitioner violated Cal. Health & Safety Code §11352(a)?

The court remanded, finding the record inconclusive as to how Petitioner violated Cal. Health & Safety Code §11352(a), and that the BIA erred in concluding he had been convicted of an aggravated felony trafficking offense. (Young v. Holder, 1/28/11)

Petitioner: questions and answers

Petitioner to pursue an argument never presented to the BIA

Petitioner income

Our Immigration Law Firm

Court reversed the termination of Petitioner’s immigrant visa for failure to apply within one year

The court reversed the termination of Petitioner’s immigrant visa for failure to apply within one year. INA §203(g) and 22 CFR §42.67(b) require notice “to the alien” but DOS sent notice only to the attorney and the I-130 petitioner. (Singh v. Clinton, 8/20/10).

Petitioner

Petitioner income

Petitioner and immigration

Our immigration Law Firm

Petitioner was a Drug Trafficker?

The court held that a vacated conviction that was based on a guilty plea combined with hearsay statements from police reports did not provide enough reason to believe that the petitioner trafficked in a controlled substance.

New Regulation on Applicant and Petitioners representation

In light of recent changes in policy USCIS issued a list of questions and answers on the new DHS regulation that clarifies who is authorized to represent applicants and petitioners in cases before DHS and updates in policy standards and disciplinary procedures for these immigration practitioners.

California Immigration Lawyer

Immigration Attorney near me

California Immigration

New regulation on applicant representation