• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Schumer Will Push Comprehensive Immigration Bill

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer will push for comprehensive immigration reform to get through Congress. Tomorrow, the House of Representatives is expected to vote on the American Dream and Promise Act (H.R. 6) and the Farm Workforce Modernization Act (H.R. 1603).

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/comprehensive-immigration-reform/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/immigration-reform-bills/

https://californiaimmigration.us/immigration-reform-dapa/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/immigration-reform-economic-visa/

White House announces sweeping immigration bill.

On Thursday, the White House announced a sweeping immigration bill that would create an eight-year path to citizenship for millions of immigrants already in the country and provide a faster track for undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children. The bill faces an uphill battle in Congress where it needs 60 votes to pass in the Senate. Administration officials stated Wednesday evening that the legislation was an attempt by President Biden to restart a conversation on overhauling the U.S. immigration system and said he remained open to negotiating.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/comprehensive-immigration-reform/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/constitutionality-of-immigration-reform/

https://californiaimmigration.us/immigration-reform-news-makes-new-policies-deportation/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/immigration-reform-2014/

Biden to propose eight-year path to citizenship for illegal immigrants.

President Joe Biden is set to propose an extensive immigration reform bill on day one of his administration, which includes an eight-year path to citizenship for an estimated 11 million people living in the U.S. illegally. The bill would offer one of the quickest pathways to citizenship for undocumented immigrants in recent years: those living in the U.S. illegally as of Jan. 1 would have a five-year path to a green card contingent upon a background check, paying taxes, and other basic requirements. After, eligible immigrants would have a three-year path to naturalization.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/comprehensive-immigration-reform/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/immigration-reform-2014/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/constitutionality-of-immigration-reform/

https://californiaimmigration.us/immigration-reform-dapa/

Bipartisan Pair of Senators Reintroduces Immigration Reform Bill Protecting ‘Dreamers’

Senators Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) introduced the latest iteration of the Dream Act, part of a new immigration reform push. Hard to believe that Senator Graham wants to help. The reintroduction comes as President Biden begins rolling out his immigration reform agenda. The bill would grant some young, undocumented immigrants lawful permanent residence and eventually U.S. citizenship if they meet certain criteria.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/comprehensive-immigration-reform/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/constitutionality-of-immigration-reform/

https://californiaimmigration.us/good-changes-horizon-immigration-reform-2014/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/immigration-reform-2014/

Texas’s request for 30 day extension DENIED

The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a request from Texas and other states for a 30-day extension to file briefs in support of the lawsuit to block President Obama’s executive actions on immigration. Instead, the Court accepted DOJ’s request for a shortened eight-day extension, making it possible for the Court to decide the case in the 2015–16 term, should the Court grant the government’s cert petition.

Immigration reform is coming

Immigration reform, questions and answers

Immigration reform bills

Good changes horizon Immigration reform 

Prosecutorial discretion granted and deportation case administratively closed for client with 10+ years in the United States but no immediate relatives, no documented employment history or tax filings and several vehicle code arrests/convictions.  Client can now remain in the U.S. legally in hope of immigration reform in the future.

Immigration reform bills

An immigration reform

Immigration reform news

Immigration reform, what is it?

Texas Judge wants to dig in with his order against Immigration Reform

Following a new order by U.S. District Court Judge Andrew Hanen in the Texas v. United States litigation, USCIS advised DACA recipients who received a three-year Employment Authorization Document (EAD) that the three-year EAD and DACA approval notice are no longer valid, and reminded recipients to return three-year EADs previously issued to them. The new July 7, 2015, order requires top immigration enforcement officials, including DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson, to appear at a hearing in Texas on August 19, 2015, to discuss the 2,000 three-year EADs that were issued following the injunction on expanded DACA and DAPA.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/comprehensive-immigration-reform/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/constitutionality-of-immigration-reform/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/immigration-reform/

https://californiaimmigration.us/immigration-reform-dapa/

Immigration Reform and Parole Explanations

The immigration reform has stirred national debate. Is it constitutional?

As most people know at this point, immigration reform has hit the U.S. through an executive order by President Obama and not through Congress. Brian Lerner explains that there is a hefty debate going on with this issue as to whether the immigration reform was constitutional or not.

See Brian D. Lerner speak about the immigration reform news 2014 about the new DACA

The Republicans are angry and state that Congress should be making laws regarding immigration reform. However, the U.S. Senate prepared a complete bill for immigration reform. It included an overhaul of both enforcement and affirmative immigration. However, explains Brian D. Lerner, when the Bill was sent to the U.S. House of Representatives, it sat there and sat there and sat there. The Speaker of the House would not even bring it for an up or down vote. Thus, while the Republicans are now furious that President Obama took the immigration reform in his own hands, the statements that Congress should do something is a bit disingenuous. They may have disagreed with the Senate version of the Bill, but why not put it up for debate? Why not allow it to go for a vote? Rather, they did nothing. Thus, explains Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Attorney, it is not as though President Obama came rushing through the doors to do immigration reform. Rather, he waited 1 ½ years after the Senate passed a bill. Clearly the immigration system is broken and immigration reform is needed.

 

Thus, the question: Is executive action by the President of the United States on Immigration Reform constitutional? In actuality, all the way back to the first President of the United States, George Washington, there have been executive orders. In this case, only when Congress has failed to act, did President Obama take action. In actuality, President Obama has not issued a lot of executive orders in his tenor as President of the United States. Now, for what seems like the first time, the House is stating they should debate and talk about the issue on immigration reform. That is great! If the President giving an executive order  is what is necessary to get the House to do something for the people of the United States on immigration reform, then President Obama’s executive action is working.

 

The President has the constitutional power to carry out his Presidency. He has actually not made any new laws, but has instituted an executive order in which to implement his policies. This is his prerogative. The issue with the constitutionality of this executive order is further shown to be legal based upon the past. DACA or DREAMERS or Deferred action has been around for a couple of years. This was also made via an executive order by President Obama. Why did the Republicans not question this executive order? Why did they not bring a lawsuit or try to get some order that DACA itself was not constitutional? Here, explains Brian D. Lerner with the current executive order, DACA has been expanded. However, the expansion of DACA goes to basically taking away the upper age limit and making it so instead of being here in the U.S. since 2007, it would be 2010. Granted, the immigration reform and constitutionality of that reform is questioning the other provisions as well. However, it seems, according to Brian Lerner, that it is the content of the immigration reform and perhaps the expansion is what has many Republicans trying to fight it. However, according to Brian D. Lerner, the immigration reform has taken effect and there are a great many organizations and Law Professors all across the U.S. which have expressed their support for the immigration reform and its constitutionality. Of course there are about 17 Repblican Governors that have filed suit against the unconstitutionality of the immigration reform. It is the opinion of Brian D. Lerner, that this suit is more of a political statement as it is unlikely to be ruled that it is not constitutional.


There are certainly a lot of arguments on both sides. However, immigration reform is needed (whether you are for immigration reform or against immigration reform) and one way or another it must be done. Thus, if President Obama’s executive action has started the wheels of Congress debating and moving forward, then hopefully the momentum will continue and Congress will ultimately pass a much needed immigration reform package.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/immigration-reform-2014/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/immigration-reform/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/immigration-reform-2013/

https://californiaimmigration.us/immigration-reform-dapa/

DREAMERS and Immigration Reform. What is needed?

Immigration Reform is here and Dreamers can get a work permit and get to be here legally if they qualify. Brian Lerner states that Dreamers has been able to apply for DACA or Deferred Action for the last 2-3 years. However, with the new immigration reform for Dreamers, we now have an expanded DACA and more people will qualify for Dreamers.

 

Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Attorney states that the following list is the general requirements of the immigration reform for Dreamers:

The program will be open to individuals who:

 

  1. Came to the United States before reaching your 16th birthday;
  2. Have continuously resided in the United States since January 1, 2010, up to the present time;
  3. Were physically present in the United States on June 15, 2012, and at the time of making your request for consideration of deferred action with USCIS;
  4. Had no lawful status on June 15, 2012;
  5. Are currently in school, have graduated or obtained a certificate of completion from high school, have obtained a general education development (GED) certificate, or are an honorably discharged veteran of the Coast Guard or Armed Forces of the United States; and
  6. Have not been convicted of a felony, significant misdemeanor,or three or more other misdemeanors, and do not otherwise pose a threat to national security or public safety.

Brian Lerner, immigration attorney states that the difference between this immigration reform for Dreamers and the last Immigration Reform for Dreamers is that it first takes out the upper age requirement. Basically, one could not be older than 31 years old at the time that the first immigration reform Dreamers was made. Now, they can be as old as they are. However, the applicant, in accordance with Brian D. Lerner, must have not been older than 16 years old when he or she entered the United States.

See Brian D. Lerner speak about the immigration reform news 2014 about the new DACA

Additionally, another element with the new immigration reform is that instead of having to be physically present from all the way back in 2007, they can now show that they have been physically present since 2010. Otherwise, the immigration reform for Dreamers is basically the same. One item of concern is that you have to look at the last item regarding the criminal history of the applicant. Now, with the new immigration reform for Dreamers, there is also a rather comprehensive memo from the director of Department of Homeland Security which makes clear that someone may be under priority 1, priority 2 or priority 3 or no priority at all for immigration enforcement. Thus, there is the interplay between the immigration reform for Dreamers requirement that somebody not have been convicted of a felony or significant misdemeanor or 3 or more other misdemeanors and how that interacts with the enforcement memo. Brian Lerner also states that the definition of what is a ‘significant’ misdemeanor and/or felony seems to have been clarified somewhat by the new priority memo. Assumably, if somebody qualifies for the immigration reform for Dreamers, they will not be deported – even if under a certain priority category for enforcement.  Brian Lerner states we will have to see how this plays out and hope that the immigration officials will follow properly the executive order as well as the new policy memorandum on enforcement priorities.


As  usual, with immigration reform for Dreamers, there are questions and ambiguities and issues that need to be resolved. However, in the end, it is a good expansion of the immigration reform for Dreamers and is constitutional under the law.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/dreamers/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/immigration-reform/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/immigration-reform-news/

https://californiaimmigration.us/dreamers-immigration-reform-needed/