Have an approved h1 petition valid till 2011. Currently in the USA for the past 2 years on L1B – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/QzXW2
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Leave a comment »
Have an approved h1 petition valid till 2011. Currently in the USA for the past 2 years on L1B – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/QzXW2
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Leave a comment »
can an illegal allien take a domestic flight within the United States with a Mexican passport? – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/RwP40
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Leave a comment »
Travel outside of US while H1B transfer? – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/8BpM1
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Leave a comment »
A new case in favor of applicants. When an application for relief is timely filed but supporting documents are not submitted within the time established, the Immigration Judge may deem the opportunity to file the documents to be waived but may not deem the application itself abandoned.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Leave a comment »
USCIS issued a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) on E-Verify conducted in order to better assist the public in understanding this program. Previously, USCIS addressed the E-Verify program as part of the Verification Information System (VIS).
Filed under: Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA), USCIS, Verification Information System (VIS) | Tagged: Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA), USCIS, Verification Information System (VIS) | Leave a comment »
DHS issued a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) update that describes the expanded collection of business information from both new registering employers and a commercial data provider, Dun and Bradstreet (D&B), in order to ensure that registering companies are genuine businesses.
Filed under: Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA), USCIS | Tagged: DHS, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA), USCIS | Leave a comment »
A new case on parole. (1) Conditional parole under section 236(a)(2)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a)(2)(B) (2006), is a distinct and different procedure from parole under section 212(d)(5)(A) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(d)(5)(A) (2006). (2) An alien who was released from custody on conditional parole pursuant to section 236(a)(2)(B) of the Act has not been “paroled into the United States†for purposes of establishing eligibility for adjustment of status under section 245(a) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1255(a) (2006).
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Leave a comment »
A new case: Board of Immigration Appeals did not abuse its discretion in denying late-filed motion to reopen removal proceedings where Guatemalan petitioner’s HIV diagnosis was not new information and was only a change in personal circumstances. Adoption of the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement–which petitioner argued could affect access to treatment–did not amount to changed country conditions that resurrected petitioner’s late-filed motion where he failed to show that passage of the treaty was material to his claim. Lopez Almaraz v. Holder
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Leave a comment »
The immigration challenges faced by lawful permanent residents who are transferred to work abroad for a U.S. company and highlight strategies to ensure continued maintenance of status.
Filed under: Expatriate, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, LPR, USCIS | Tagged: Expatriate, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, LPR, USCIS | Leave a comment »
Comment Request extended by the USCIS on National Interest Waivers and supplemental evidence to Forms I-140 and I-485.
Filed under: Form I-140, Form I-485, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, National Interest Waiver | Tagged: Form I-140, Form I-485, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, National Interest Waivers | 1 Comment »