The Ninth Circuit reversed the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of the petitioner’s adjustment of status application, finding that the petitioner reasonably relied on Acosta v. Gonzales, which was the law of the circuit in effect at the time he applied to adjust status, but which was later overruled by Garfias-Rodriguez v. Holder. The court held that the BIA’s decision in Matter of Briones should not be applied retroactively to bar the petitioner’s application, because the petitioner’s reliance interests and the burden that retroactivity would impose on him outweighed the interest in uniform application of the immigration laws.

https://brian-d-lerner-blog.com/tag/245-1/

https://brian-d-lerner-blog.com/tag/245i/

https://brian-d-lerner-blog.com/tag/245/

https://californiaimmigration.us/adjustment-of-status-245i-cases/

Home » Immigration Updates » Entered illegally after a deportation order AND have a 245(i) application? Which controls?

Entered illegally after a deportation order AND have a 245(i) application? Which controls?