The Fifth Circuit reversed the district court, holding that a judge’s statement at a guilty plea proceeding that deportation is “likely” does not foreclose a noncitizen defendant’s ability to demonstrate prejudice as a result of counsel’s failure to provide Padilla-required advice about the immigration consequences of the plea.
Court Finds Judge’s Deportation Warning at Guilty Plea Proceeding Does Not Satisfy Padilla
Related Posts
Another win for the Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner
After Client’s motion to vacate (PC § 1473.7) his 1994 felony conviction for sale of marijuana was granted, the POST WEDNESDAYImmigration Court in San Diego,…
Federal Court Requires Immigration Courts to Continue to Provide Bond Hearings Despite Matter of M‑S‑
In Padilla v. ICE, a district court judge issued a decision that requires immigration courts to continue to provide bond hearings to individuals fleeing persecution who enter the…
Court Finds California Felony Conviction Reclassified as a Misdemeanor Retains Its Immigration Consequences
The Ninth Circuit concluded that the petitioner’s felony conviction for Possession of Marijuana for Sale under California Health & Safety Code §11359 rendered the petitioner removable,…
AG Barr trying to redefine criminal relief and what is a conviction.
On May 28, 2019, the Attorney General (AG) certified to himself two cases, Matter of Thomas and Matter of Thompson. 27 I&N Dec. 556 (A.G. 2019). The AG has asked…
The Court Says Petitioner Failed to Show That His Conviction Was Not Vacated for Immigration Purposes
The Eighth Circuit upheld the BIA’s finding that the petitioner failed to meet his burden of proving that his state court conviction for theft in the fourth…