The court held that the notice requirements of the INA were satisfied by a combination of two notices, and that once sufficient notice is provided, the stop-time rule is triggered notwithstanding any defects in subsequent notices.
Home » Immigration Updates » CA2 on Notice and Stop-Time Rule Requirements
CA2 on Notice and Stop-Time Rule Requirements
Related Posts
The Supreme Court has granted a case on the stop-time rule for next term.
On June 8, the Supreme Court announced that it will hear an immigration case on the stop-time rule in its next term. The stop-time rule, which stops…
Court Says Stop-Time Rule Is Triggered by One Complete NTA, Not a Combination of Documents
Granting the petition for review, the 10th Circuit held that, given the unambiguous statutory language for the stop-time rule and Notices to Appear (NTAs), the stop-time rule…
Federal Judge Finds Asylum Seekers Can Access Attorneys During Credible Fear Interviews
U.S. District Judge Dana M. Sabraw found that the government may not conduct class members’ non-refoulement interviews without first affording the interviewees access to their retained…
Immigration Law Firm Opens 5000 Cases
Our Law Office has been working in Immigration Law for nearly 30 years. We have just passed the opening of 5000 cases. Thus, we have…
Court Grants Review of BIA Denial of Cancellation, Holds Findings Were Not Supported by Record and BIA Failed to Apply Appropriate Standard of Review
he Sixth Circuit determined the BIA erred in finding new evidence was previously available and that the BIA failed to consider hardship ground raised in the…