The court held the petitioner did not derive citizenship under the controlling statute – 8 U.S.C. § 1432(a) – because only one of his parents naturalized before his eighteenth birthday, and that the statute did not deny equal protection.
Home » Immigration Updates » CA9 on Derivative Citizenship and Equal Protection
CA9 on Derivative Citizenship and Equal Protection
Related Posts
Son Born Abroad to Gay Couple Is a U.S. Citizen
The Ninth Circuit ruled against DOS in its quest to deny the U.S. citizenship of one of two twins born abroad to a gay married…
Federal Judge Finds Asylum Seekers Can Access Attorneys During Credible Fear Interviews
U.S. District Judge Dana M. Sabraw found that the government may not conduct class members’ non-refoulement interviews without first affording the interviewees access to their retained…
Immigration Law Firm Opens 5000 Cases
Our Law Office has been working in Immigration Law for nearly 30 years. We have just passed the opening of 5000 cases. Thus, we have…
Hire a qualified Immigration Attorney and Deportation Lawyer
Hiring a Deportation Attorney is Critical to the Success of the Case Hiring a Los Angeles Immigration Attorney is critical to the successful outcome…