The court held that res judicata did not bar the government from lodging new removability charges based on convictions it had not previously raised and that petitioner’s 212(c) waiver did not apply to the instant removal order. (Duhaney v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 8/24/10)
Tags:212(c) Waiver ApplicationBrian D. LernerImmigration AttorneyImmigration LawyerLaw Offices of Brian D. LernerRes Judicata
Related Posts
The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) issued an interim final rule to require travelers from Visa Waiver Program (VWP) countries to pay operational and…
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a final rule expanding the list of dependents who are eligible for employment authorization to include any other…
List of Student and Exchange Visitor Program Approved Schools
On 08/4/10, ICE updated its list of Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) approved schools. Student and exchange visitor program Updated list of student and…
Summary of a teleconference for H-2A petitioners on prohibited fees
USCIS released the summary of a teleconference for H-2A petitioners on prohibited fees. The summary includes information about H-2A regulations on prohibited fees, how USCIS…
H-2B Cap Count for FY2011
As of 7/30/10, USCIS receipted 3,116 H-2B petitions, including approved and pending, toward the 33,000 H-2B cap amount for the first half of the fiscal…