• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Have you been battered by your spouse? Get a VAWA Petition

VAWA Attorney

 

A VAWA Attorneywill be able to let you know if you qualify for the battered spouse petition. Many spouses (especially wives of U.S. Citizens or Lawful Permanent Residents) allow themselves to be continually beaten by their husbands for fear if they say anything they will be deported. The VAWA Attorney makes clear that you do not have to continue with the abusive relationship. Rather, explains the VAWA Attorney, there is an option. You can file a petition under VAWA (Violence against Women’s Act) known as the battered spouse petition. It is this petition, the VAWA Attorney explains that if approved will allow you to obtain your lawful permanent residency.

 

The battered spouse petition, has several different items that must be submitted. The VAWA Attorney will explain that first there must be a legitimate marriage and that the marriage must be bonafide. A VAWA Attorney makes clear that it must be a real marriage and one because of love, not for the Green Card. Additionally, the battered spouse attorney will explain that the actual marriage must be under the law, not a common law marriage.  In addition to the following, the VAWA Attorney explains that you should always get a psychological report which will show the pain and suffering which you have endured. Thus, you will need to obtain the services of the psychologist and go in significant detail about everything that has happened. The battered spouse attorney will let you know that it will be painful to go over all the details and incidents that have occurred in the past. However, the VAWA Attorney explains that it is critical to the success of the petition itself.

 

Another part of the battered spouse petition is the declaration. The VAWA Attorney will give you a detailed interview and will prepare a declaration on your situation which you will have to sign. It will go into great deal, explains the VAWA Attorney. It will explain all the times you were physically beat, all the times you had to go to the hospital. The battered spouse attorney will further prepare put in times and places and dates to make the declaration credible and believable. Without detail, and without specifics, the VAWA Attorney cannot make a coherent and believable argument. Therefore, a VAWA Attorney makes clear you must relive what has happened and you must be honest with your battered spouse attorney and your psychologist. Without honesty and without reliving the past, it is unlikely to get approved.

 

The VAWA Attorney explains that you do not only need to show physical abuse, but it is possible to show only severe emotional abuse as well. In this case, there does not need to be physical abuse and the battered spouse attorney may be able to prove only severe emotional abuse in order to get this petition approved. Many times, if prepared correctly, the VAWA Attorney may be able to show you will prevail on this petition even if you are the husband. Sometimes, if it is the husband who is filing this petition, he could certainly show financial threats and deportation threats and a variety of other threats that could lead to showing severe emotional abuse.

 

Watch VAWA Attorney discuss the VAWA battered spouse petition

 

The VAWA Attorney will be able to explain that this petition is the first petition to try to obtain residency. In fact, if the VAWA Attorney is approved, then you can apply for residency. You will be able to apply for adjustment of status regardless if you are here in the U.S. legally or illegally. Additionally, if you are inadmissible, explains a VAWA Attorney, you can file waivers of inadmissibility. Sometimes, if you can show that the inadmissibility is related to the abuse, you will be able to have a better chance of getting the waiver approved as will be explained by the battered spouse attorney.

 

A VAWA Attorney explains that at the adjustment interview that the officer has no right to go back into the facts of the abuse. It is only to determine eligibility to adjust status. This is all the more reason, explains a VAWA Attorney that you should have an attorney present at the interview. This will allow the battered spouse attorney to interject the proper argument should the officer start going off to left field with the questions and trying to get you to recant or reprove all the elements of the battered spouse petition.

 

It is unfortunate that there is physical and mental abuse committed on immigrants espouses the VAWA Attorney. However, on the other hand, it is fortunate that those people who are victims are able to apply for the battered spouse petition. Just make sure that if you’re going to apply for the battered spouse petition that you hire a qualified and experienced battered spouse attorney.

VAWA Attorney

A VAWA Attorneywill be able to let you know if you qualify for the battered spouse petition. Many spouses (especially wives of U.S. Citizens or Lawful Permanent Residents) allow themselves to be continually beaten by their husbands for fear if they say anything they will be deported. The VAWA Attorney makes clear that you do not have to continue with the abusive relationship. Rather, explains the VAWA Attorney, there is an option. You can file a petition under VAWA (Violence against Women’s Act) known as the battered spouse petition. It is this petition, the VAWA Attorney explains that if approved will allow you to obtain your lawful permanent residency.

The battered spouse petition, has several different items that must be submitted. The VAWA Attorney will explain that first there must be a legitimate marriage and that the marriage must be bonafide. A VAWA Attorney makes clear that it must be a real marriage and one because of love, not for the Green Card. Additionally, the battered spouse attorney will explain that the actual marriage must be under the law, not a common law marriage.  In addition to the following, the VAWA Attorney explains that you should always get a psychological report which will show the pain and suffering which you have endured. Thus, you will need to obtain the services of the psychologist and go in significant detail about everything that has happened. The battered spouse attorney will let you know that it will be painful to go over all the details and incidents that have occurred in the past. However, the VAWA Attorney explains that it is critical to the success of the petition itself.

Another part of the battered spouse petition is the declaration. The VAWA Attorney will give you a detailed interview and will prepare a declaration on your situation which you will have to sign. It will go into great deal, explains the VAWA Attorney. It will explain all the times you were physically beat, all the times you had to go to the hospital. The battered spouse attorney will further prepare put in times and places and dates to make the declaration credible and believable. Without detail, and without specifics, the VAWA Attorney cannot make a coherent and believable argument. Therefore, a VAWA Attorney makes clear you must relive what has happened and you must be honest with your battered spouse attorney and your psychologist. Without honesty and without reliving the past, it is unlikely to get approved.

The VAWA Attorney explains that you do not only need to show physical abuse, but it is possible to show only severe emotional abuse as well. In this case, there does not need to be physical abuse and the battered spouse attorney may be able to prove only severe emotional abuse in order to get this petition approved. Many times, if prepared correctly, the VAWA Attorney may be able to show you will prevail on this petition even if you are the husband. Sometimes, if it is the husband who is filing this petition, he could certainly show financial threats and deportation threats and a variety of other threats that could lead to showing severe emotional abuse.

Watch VAWA Attorney discuss the VAWA battered spouse petition

The VAWA Attorney will be able to explain that this petition is the first petition to try to obtain residency. In fact, if the VAWA Attorney is approved, then you can apply for residency. You will be able to apply for adjustment of status regardless if you are here in the U.S. legally or illegally. Additionally, if you are inadmissible, explains a VAWA Attorney, you can file waivers of inadmissibility. Sometimes, if you can show that the inadmissibility is related to the abuse, you will be able to have a better chance of getting the waiver approved as will be explained by the battered spouse attorney.

A VAWA Attorney explains that at the adjustment interview that the officer has no right to go back into the facts of the abuse. It is only to determine eligibility to adjust status. This is all the more reason, explains a VAWA Attorney that you should have an attorney present at the interview. This will allow the battered spouse attorney to interject the proper argument should the officer start going off to left field with the questions and trying to get you to recant or reprove all the elements of the battered spouse petition.

It is unfortunate that there is physical and mental abuse committed on immigrants espouses the VAWA Attorney. However, on the other hand, it is fortunate that those people who are victims are able to apply for the battered spouse petition. Just make sure that if you’re going to apply for the battered spouse petition that you hire a qualified and experienced battered spouse attorney.

VAWA

VAWA facts

VAWA attorney

File a VAWA application

Another win for the Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner

Vawa approved for Client who was in an abusive relationship but only lived with her husband for a short period and did not have police or hospital reports.

VAWA

VAWA Attorney

Find a VAWA lawyer to help you

Family petitions to immigrate family members 

 

More Update on VAWA Facts

More VAWA facts: 212(a)(9)(c) is not a permanent bar; 212 and 601 waivers available at local office; EWI is OK; Public charge relaxed by completing I-864W; 212(i) Waivers do not need qualifying relative and 212(h) Waivers need not show hardship.

VAWA

VAWA Attorney

VAWA meaning

If your husband is beating you get a VAWA Attorney LA to file a VAWA application for you

More Updated VAWA Facts

More VAWA facts: 212(a)(9)(c) is not a permanent bar; 212 and 601 waivers available at local office; EWI is OK; Public charge relaxed by completing I-864W; 212(i) Waivers do not need qualifying relative and 212(h) Waivers need not show hardship.

Get a VAWA 

VAWA petition 

Update on VAWA facts 

VAWA attorney 

VAWA

VAWA:
For C/R in court – the hardship to show is a)much less than C/R regular applications AND you can show hardship to relatives and victim.

VAWA self-petition 

VAWA facts

Battered or abused parent

VAWA – victims 

USCIS issued a draft policy memo on VAWA self-petition

USCIS issued a draft policy memo on an INA amendment that provides for continued eligibility for certain individuals to file a VAWA self-petition as a child after attaining age 21, but before attaining age 25.

VAWA definition

VAWA Attorney

VAWA and immigration

VAWA changes for those who are victims of sex trafficking crimes and domestic violence

Immigration Attorneys can now go forward with Domestic Violence Asylum Claims

Attorneys who practice Immigration Law have been somewhat at a standstill for years regarding domestic violence cases as there was no law that gave such people the protection needed. However, the Matter of R_A_ has just been decided in favor of the person who was abused via domestic violence. Senator Leahy has issued a statement regarding this case which is right on point. It shows how domestic violence cases will now get the protection of U.S. asylum laws. His memo follows:

CONTACT: Office of Senator Leahy, 202-224-4242 VERMONT
Leahy Praises Resolution In Alvarado Asylum Case,
Pushes Administration To Issue Regulations

WASHINGTON (Tuesday, Dec. 15, 2009) – Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) Tuesday praised the conclusion of a 14-year legal struggle that has resulted in the United States granting asylum to a domestic abuse survivor from Guatemala.  Last week, an immigration judge granted asylum to Ms. Rody Alvarado, who fled to the United States in the 1990s seeking protection under the nation’s asylum laws.

“The details of Ms. Alvarado’s case are shocking,” said Leahy.  “She suffered from horrific domestic violence in her home country of Guatemala, and sought protection in the United States under our asylum laws.  Because persecution of this type had not previously been recognized as a basis for refugee or asylum protection, Ms. Alvarado was forced to fight a long legal battle to win her case.”
Ms. Alvarado fled her native Guatemala in 1995 to seek asylum in the United States as a result of sexual and domestic violence committed by her husband.  Guatemalan police failed to intervene in the domestic violence despite the fact that Ms. Alvarado reported the crimes on five separate occasions.  As a result, Ms. Alvarado came to the United States seeking protection under asylum laws.
Leahy continued, “The administrations of three different presidents – Clinton, Bush and Obama
– have grappled with how to handle gender-based asylum claims, but the resolution of this case brings us closer to the end of this journey.  Ms. Alvarado can finally feel safe here in the United States, because she is no longer at risk of being deported to Guatemala.  The Obama administration must now issue regulations to ensure that other victims of domestic violence whose abuse rises to the level of persecution can obtain the same protection as refugees or asylees.”
Through three administrations, Leahy pressed five Attorneys General and three Homeland Security Secretaries to intervene in Ms. Alvarado’s case.  In a statement Friday, Leahy urged the Obama administration to issue binding regulations to address further gender-based asylum claims.

“The Obama administration has laid out a welcomed, new policy in its legal briefs in this case, and I thank the President, Secretary Napolitano, and Attorney General Holder for bringing this case to such a positive resolution.  Yet, the administration’s work is not done.  It must issue binding regulations so that asylum seekers whose cases have been held in limbo for years can also be resolved and that future cases are not delayed in adjudication.”

The full text of Leahy’s statement follows.

# # #

Leahy Praises Resolution In Alvarado Asylum Case, Pushes Administrati… http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200912/121509b.html
1 of 3 12/16/2009 9:51 AM
AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 09121662.  (Posted 12/16/09)

Statement Of Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.),
Chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee,
On The Case of Ms. Rody Alvarado
December 15, 2009

I am pleased to learn that, after 14 years of legal struggle, Ms. Rody Alvarado has finally received asylum in the United States.  The details of Ms. Alvarado’s case are shocking.  She suffered from horrific domestic violence in her home country of Guatemala, and sought protection in the United States under our asylum laws.  Because persecution of this type had not previously been recognized as a basis for refugee or asylum protection, Ms. Alvarado was forced to fight a long legal battle to win her case.

The administrations of three different presidents – Clinton, Bush and Obama – have grappled with how to handle gender-based asylum claims, but the resolution of this case brings us closer to the end of this journey.  Ms. Alvarado can finally feel safe here in the United States, because she is no longer at risk of being deported to Guatemala.  The Obama administration must now issue regulations to ensure that other victims of domestic violence whose abuse rises to the level of persecution can obtain the same protection as refugees or asylees.

Ms. Alvarado fled Guatemala in 1995 after being beaten daily and raped repeatedly by her husband.  When she became pregnant, but refused to terminate her pregnancy, her husband kicked her repeatedly in the lower spine.   Ms. Alvarado had previously tried to escape the abuse, seeking protection in another part of Guatemala, but her husband tracked her down and threatened to kill her if she left their home again.  We know that Ms. Alvarado notified Guatemalan police at least five separate times, but the police refused to respond, telling her that her desperate situation was a domestic dispute that needed to be settled at home.

Over the past 14 years, Ms. Alvarado’s case has been considered by immigration judges, the Board of Immigration Appeals, and three different Attorneys General.  Throughout this extensive consideration, the core facts of her case have never been disputed.  All parties have agreed that Ms. Alvarado suffered extreme abuse at the hands of her husband, and that the Guatemalan government would not protect her.  All parties agreed that she has a well-founded fear that she would be abused again if she was forced to return to Guatemala.

The dispute in Ms. Alvarado’s case centered on whether the abuse she suffered was persecution under the terms of the Refugee Convention and applicable U.S. law.  To obtain protection in the United States, an asylum seeker must demonstrate that they have a well-founded fear of persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group.

I first wrote to Attorney General Janet Reno in December 1999, when the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) reversed Ms. Alvarado’s grant of asylum, concluding that her abuse was not persecution on account of membership in a particular social group.  This decision was particularly troubling because it left unclear what grounds, if any, could be applied to a victim of severe domestic abuse who cannot obtain the protection of her country of origin.  I wrote to Attorney General Reno again in February and September 2000 asking her to exercise her authority to review the case, called Matter of R-A-, and to reverse the BIA’s decision.
Unfortunately, the case was not reversed at that time, and it then languished for years.  I wrote to Attorney General Ashcroft in June 2004 asking him to work with the Department of Leahy Praises Resolution In Alvarado Asylum Case, Pushes Administrati… http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200912/121509b.html
2 of 3 12/16/2009 9:51 AM
AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 09121662.  (Posted 12/16/09)
Homeland Security (DHS) to issue regulations to govern cases such as Ms. Alvarado’s and to then decide her case in accordance with such rules.  When he was a nominee to be Attorney General in January 2005, I asked Mr. Alberto Gonzales to commit to taking up the case and resolving it if he was confirmed.  Mr. Gonzales promised to work with DHS to finalize regulations, but did not take any action during his years as Attorney General.

Ten years after I and other members of Congress first sought appropriate action and the fair resolution of this case, we celebrate the long-overdue outcome.  While I dismayed at the length of time Ms. Alvarado has lived with fear and uncertainty, the final resolution of this case gives me hope that abuse victims like Ms. Alvarado who meet the other conditions of asylum will be able to find safety in the United States.

The Obama administration has laid out a welcomed, new policy in its legal briefs in this case, and I thank the President, Secretary Napolitano, and Attorney General Holder for bringing this case to such a positive resolution.  Yet, the administration’s work is not done.  It must issue binding regulations so that asylum seekers whose cases have been held in limbo for years can also be resolved and that future cases are not delayed in adjudication.  I urge the administration to immediately initiate a process of notice and comment rulemaking so that asylum seekers,
practitioners, and other experts can contribute to the formulation of new rules.

Today, I commend Ms. Alvarado on the courage she has demonstrated over for many years while seeking protection in the United States.  I congratulate her and wish her all the best as she finally experiences true freedom from persecution and the full scope of liberties enjoyed by Americans.

# # #

Leahy Praises Resolution In Alvarado Asylum Case, Pushes Administrati… http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200912/121509b.html
3 of 3 12/16/2009 9:51 AM
AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 09121662.  (Posted 12/16/09)

Domestic worker

Domestic violence

Victims of domestic violence

UT and VAWA changes for those who are victims of sex trafficking crimes and domestic violence