• Hours & Info

    3233 E. Broadway,
    Long Beach, CA 90803
    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.

  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Immigration Article: Can I be deported?

Posted on September 1, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have been out of status for a number of years. Currently, I have a couple different petitions going forward. Once is a sibling based family petition, and the other is an employment based Labor Certification. I was told that it would take about another three to four years to be able to adjust my status to that of a Lawful Permanent Resident. There have been many news stories of people begin picked up by INS and deported, I am afraid for myself, my wife and my children. Can I just be deported?

Answer: Under most circumstances, the answer is no. Because you are here in the United States, you are allowed the opportunity to go in front of an Immigration Judge. Only if you had a previous deportation order can INS just take you and deport you without giving you a hearing. It is your constitutional right. Unlike many other countries around the world, even if you are not a citizen or a lawful permanent resident of the United States, you are entitled to due process. This means that you have an opportunity to present your case, to question witnesses, to cross examine witnesses who testify against you, to apply for relief or ways of staying permanently in the United States and to appeal decisions of the Immigration Judge that you are not satisfied with.

Question: What exactly might happen?

Answer: Each case is different. However, if you are targeted by INS, you should be served with what is known as a Notice to Appear. This is the beginning of the process. You might be taken into custody upon which you would be able to try to get a Bond Redetermination Hearing to get bonded out or become free while the immigration case is going forward. Then, over the next six months to two years, you will present your case in front of the Immigration Judge with the hope of winning.

Question: Am I entitled to an attorney?

Answer: Yes. You have every right to have an attorney represent you through these proceedings. However, unlike criminal cases, you must pay for the attorney to help you. The State will not provide one free of charge.

Question: How can the U.S. Constitution protect someone in my position?

Answer: Because the U.S. Constitution gives people their rights as free persons in this country. If the U.S. Government were to just pick someone up and deport them, there would not be any safeguards against possible mistakes they may make. Also, the law allows people who are out of status to obtain their Green Cards based upon certain criteria. The government allows you to present that evidence. Just remember that this is the best country in the world to live in (no offense to those people elsewhere) and one reason it is such a great place to live is because individual rights are valued and treasured by our Constitution.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/best-deportation-attorney/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation-attorney/

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Immigration Article: What did we celebrate on July 4th?

Posted on August 28, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I became a Lawful Permanent Resident several years ago, and am very grateful. However, there are several persons that I know that are not so lucky. They are still fighting to obtain legal residency in the U.S. Some are in deportation proceedings. Some are hiding in the shadows of America. Some are fearing everywhere they go. Are there any new leaders in Congress and should we give thanks of an elusive freedom that is so difficult to obtain?

 Answer: Recently, the President of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) wrote on this subject. I think it best to simply quote him. He states:

‘From the moment that terrorists attacked the United States last September, AILA has consistently supported measures legitimately required to guarantee our national security without eroding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

 AILA gratefully recognized President George W. Bush’s leadership when he reminded the nation that neither the Arabic community in the United States, nor the members of the Islamic faith throughout the world, are in any way responsible for the terrorist acts of criminals. And AILA called on leaders from both sides of the aisle to put the national interest above partisan considerations.

 Midterm Congressional elections are eminent, and the siren song of perceived political advantage has started to separate the opportunists from the statesmen. Events of the last few days have, as they say, given opportunism a bad name.

On June 20, the Dallas Morning Herald quoted Representative George Gekas, Chair of the House Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims (noting Census Bureau estimates that the undocumented population tops 8 million), as saying: “There are thousands among those millions, perhaps millions among those millions, who have exactly that kind of mind set . . . to become terrorists.”

Term limits resulted in Lamar Smith relinquishing the Immigration Subcommittee Chair in 2000. While never an immigration advocate, George Gekas, it was said, was no Lamar Smith. Could he possibly believe that there are millions of terrorists lurking among us? Had the Chair misspoken or had he unearthed an opportunist’s play book and thus signaled a sea change? Perhaps significantly, Mr. Gekas retained Smith’s subcommittee staff. And, to Mr. Gekas’s evident surprise, reapportionment has made his District more competitive, thus resulting in a serious challenge; he now must fight to win an 11th term.

Our answer came soon enough. On June 26, 2002, Mr. Gekas introduced the “Securing America’s Future through Enforcement Reform (SAFER) Act” (H.R. 5013).

SAFER is a cynical amalgam. It is over 200 pages long, but much of it can be categorized as: (1) piling on (in increasing penalties for offenses that may already be substantial); (2) redundant; and (3) grandstanding (taking credit for proposals that may eventually be enacted in other legislation). To be sure, SAFER contains some novel twists that are more than a little offensive and more than a little dangerous. (Mr. Gekas’s summary of SAFER was posted on the News Flash section of InfoNet and will remain available as Doc. No. 02062731; the text of the full bill will be posted as soon as it becomes available.) Legislatively, SAFER is irresponsible, but as its sponsors well know, it is also DOA. However, that is not the point. The point is that the political calculations were made and Representative Gekas cast his lot; he has bought FAIR’s agenda of Fear and Loathing wholesale.

 This week we celebrate our independence. The first July 4th after September 11, 2001 promises to be especially poignant. It is a particularly appropriate time to rejoice in America’s liberty and diversity and to remember the sacrifices of our people, who for four centuries, have come to these shores from every corner of the world to cultivate, nurture and defend our freedom and way of life. America is immigrants and the children of immigrants. This year a second day is just as important as July 4th to validate and affirm our nation’s freedom: our election day, Tuesday, November 5.

 I trust that on this July 4th we will hear and think a lot about fundamental American values. Between now and November 5 we must redouble our efforts to preserve these values. No one is better equipped to rebut anti-immigrant rhetoric than AILA attorneys. Don’t let mindless or hateful rhetoric go unchallenged. Write Opinion pieces and Letters to the Editor and be proactive in encouraging your clients to do the same. Go back to the basics–actively support candidates who have the courage to stand up for fundamental American values, immigrant rights and the rule of law. Encourage each of your eligible clients to naturalize, to register, and to vote. (A brochure, in both English and Spanish, with state-by-state voter registration information can be found on the InfoNet–go to “Advocacy Center,” then click on “Take Action” followed by “Vote Drive”). And oppose the politicians who have cynically chosen to use this moment of national crisis to undermine our heritage as a nation of immigrants, who would curtail the fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution. Write a check, support our friends and be sure that our foes pay the price. The tools you need are at your fingertips, through InfoNet.

The late North Carolina Congressman Richardson Preyer would began a campaign by telling the troops “It’s bumper sticker, door bell ringing time again.” So it is. Let us begin.’

Let us never take for granted the freedoms which we enjoy. There are people in our very backyard who will attempt to limit those freedoms and take them away from us.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation-attorney/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation-proceedings/

https://californiaimmigration.us/removal/winning-a-deportation-proceeding-from-an-immigration-lawyer-and-deportation-attorney

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , | Leave a comment »

HOMELAND SECURITY. WHAT DOES IT MEAN?

Posted on August 26, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have different petitions going through for my family. Other relatives are unfortunately in Removal/Deportation Proceedings. I understand that government is planning on restructuring certain departments. Will they restructure INS, and if so, what does that mean for us?

Answer: It appears as though either some or all of INS will be part of the new cabinet level division of the government. It will be known as Homeland Security. However, if it is done in a rash manner without giving the immigrants their rights, then it will hurt those immigrants trying to get her legally and to become legal in the future.

An effective, efficient, and fair immigration system is crucial to our national security and is fundamental to which we are as a people and as a nation of immigrants. Our immigration system must be reorganized. Our immigration system needs to be restructured on the basis of longstanding principles outlined by lawmakers, policy experts, and immigrant advocates.

These principles include: coordinating the separated enforcement and service functions, placing a strong leader in charge of both functions, and adequately funding enforcement and services.

If our immigration functions are included in the new Homeland Security Department, they must be reorganized within a separate division headed by a strong leader.

Question: What exactly will this new department do?

It is unclear at this time exactly what will happen and when it will happen. However, a new division, Immigration Services and Security, should be created within the Department of Homeland Security, headed by an Undersecretary who is knowledgeable about both services and enforcement. Immigration Services and Security should be made up of three sections: Immigration Services, Border Security, and Interior Security.

To enhance our security and support our border functions, a Transportation and Commercial Goods Security division also should be created. This division, along with the Immigration Services and Security division, would replace the proposed Border and Transportation Security Division.

The proposed Homeland Security Department must address concerns about civil rights, oversight, privacy, due process, and visa processing. The new agency must include an office to ensure that the constitutional and civil rights of all persons are protected as the agency carries out its national security mandates.

Policy development for visa issuance needs to remain a function of the State Department to avoid the chaos that would result from separating policy and process and to best address our foreign policy and U.S. business interests.

The Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR) must remain outside of the Department of Homeland Security, and be constituted as an independent agency in order to guarantee the impartiality and checks and balances of our justice system. Otherwise, it will be as though the Prosecutor is both the opposing attorney and the judge on the same case.

In order for any reform to be effective, Congress must take the time to get it right, overhaul our immigration laws, and protect both our nation and our values and traditions.

Creating a Department of Homeland Security is an enormous undertaking, and Congress must take the time to get it right. We cannot afford the mistakes and oversights of a hasty examination. There is too much at stake.

Department of homeland security

DHS meaning

Homeland security

Immigration reform and DHS

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

A new way to beat Deportation

Posted on August 21, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have been here in the U.S. since I was six years old. About 12 years ago, I committed a drug crime of possession for sale. I was sentenced to 4 months. Now, all these years later, I have been put into removal proceedings where INS is trying to deport me. I have been told that I am an aggravated felon and there is nothing I can do. I have further been told that I will most likely be deported away from my family including my U.S. Citizen spouse and three U.S. Citizen Children. I have never done anything else criminally and it was just a stupid mistake when I was young. I have changed, have a good job, a family with U.S. Citizens and many community ties. Is there anything I can do?

Answer: As the law stands now, there is very little you can do. This is a result of the 1996 laws which increased dramatically the laws on what was considered to be an aggravated felony. It has torn families apart for many years since 1996. People who have become long term residents in the U.S. and have their Green Cards found out it did not make any difference. They were still deported. Furthermore, they found out that they were barred from coming back into the U.S. for the rest of their lives. Congress has seen all the suffering caused by the unfair and anti-immigration laws of 1996 and just this week the House Judiciary Committee passed the 2002 Due Process Reform Bill. While it still must be passed by the Senate and signed by the President, it is an excellent step in giving back some of the due process rights lost by long term residents who were put in deportation proceedings because of various crimes.

Question: How does this particular bill help me?

Answer: Please note that the Senate might change some of the provisions, or the President might require some alternate items in the bill. However, as the bill stands now, it applies specifically to people who previously had their Green Cards. They were or are going to be placed into deportation or removal proceedings because of a crime they committed. They are considered to be an aggravated felons and do not qualify for the normal Cancellation of Removal.

Question: What is Cancellation of Removal?

Answer: Prior to this bill there was a section of the bill referred to as Cancellation of Removal for Certain Lawful Permanent Residents. Generally, you had to have your Green Card for at least five-years and be physically present in the U.S. for at least seven-years. Finally, and this is the item that disqualified numerous people, is that you cannot be convicted of an aggravated felony.

Question: What does the new bill allow?

Answer: Basically it deals with the Cancellation of Removal for people who have committed aggravated felonies. In the new bill, it expands the Cancellation of Removal so that it allows people whom have been convicted of aggravated felonies to still keep their Green Cards and stay in the U.S. It deals with three different scenarios. First, people who have been convicted of a non violent aggravated felony. Second, people who were convicted of a violent aggravated felony. Finally, people who have been convicted of an aggravated felony and came to the U.S. as a young child. Each of these provisions allows a person to remain in the U.S. and to not be deported if the Judge grants the Cancellation of Removal. Therefore, this is a very big step toward restoring some of the harsh anti-immigrant provisions of the 1996 law. Hopefully, this trend will continue so that families can be reunited and the tearing apart of immigrant families will stop. .

Abstenia deportation

Best deportation lawyer

Deportation proceedings

How to win a deportation

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Title: The BIA. Just a stepping stone.

Posted on August 17, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I lost my case at the Immigration Court. I understand that I have many issues that I can appeal and that there is a very reasonable chance that I could win. Can you let me know where my appeal goes and what might happen?

Answer: There are many Immigration Courts in the U.S. All together there are about 55 Immigration Courts through all 50 States as well as in Puerto Rico. Whenever you lose at the Immigration Court level, you appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals or the BIA. There is only one BIA in the entire United States. The BIA is located in Virginia and handles all of the appeals of every Immigration Court throughout the entire United States.

The Notice of Appeal must be in the hands of the BIA no later than 30 days after issuance of the decision from the Immigration Judge. Afterwards, it goes to a panel of three of the members of the Board of Immigration Appeals and in about one year the decision is issued.

Question: I have heard that there will be some changes at the BIA. Is that true and what are they?

Answer: Yes it is true. The changes are not for the better. In fact, the changes will make the appeal process to the BIA an exercise in futility and will deny numerous rights to immigrants and their rights to appeal. Attorney General Ashcroft has just issued regulations to go into effect later this month that will change some of the basic ways that the BIA decides cases. First, they will no longer make a three member panel to decide cases, but only one member will decide. Only on cases of novel importance or ones that are unusually complicated will it be referred to a three member panel. Who decides if a case is novel or unusual is unclear. In all other real appeals (other than the new BIA regulations) it goes to a three member panel. This gives the person appealing the knowledge and satisfaction that the appeal will be decided among three qualified persons who must come to a consensus. Now, the appeal at the BIA, for the most part, is in the hands of one person. This item by itself takes away much of the due process and fairness to the immigrant.

Next, there is now a timetable that is set for deciding the case. Thus, rather than taking the necessary time to properly decide the case, the Attorney General has mandated that the cases take around 6 months. Thus, again there is a violation of the Due Process rights of immigrants. An appeal should not have as its primary importance the number of days or months it must be decided. What this will do is make a single member rush through cases to make sure that the timetable is met, rather than the case being decided on its merits.

Question: What will happen if the BIA denies the case?

Answer: In reality, that is what will happen in most cases. Because of these new regulations, and because of the violation of Constitutional Due Process rights, people will simply use the BIA as a stepping stone to get to the real appeal. Once the BIA denies the case, it can be appealed directly to a Circuit Appellate Court of the United States. These courts are right below the U.S. Supreme Court. In these appeals, there will be a three judge panel and they will give a real chance to have the case heard on the merits. Do not give up with these new regulations. Just keep fighting until you get to the Circuit Courts, and hopefully, we can restore the immigrant rights that have been lost.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/appeal-to-bia/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia-board-of-immigration-appeals/

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Title: ESSENTIAL WORKERS HELP OUR ECONOMY Part II

Posted on August 12, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: What are Essential Workers?

Answer: “Essential Workers” are the unskilled and semi-skilled workers employed in all sectors of our economy. Essential workers include restaurant workers, retail clerks, construction trades people, manufacturing line workers, hotel service workers, food production workers, landscape workers, and health care aids. It includes a multitude of other types of professions. These individuals often work in the jobs that many Americans do not choose, but which are “essential” to keep our economy and our country growing.

Question: Are there not enough U.S. workers for these jobs?

Answer: The demographics say no. By 2010, total civilian employment is projected to be 167.8 million, but the total civilian labor force is expected to be 158 million, more than nine million more jobs than people.

New jobs will increase dramatically by 2010, boosting the demand for Essential Workers. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) projections indicate that the U.S. will create 22 million new jobs by 2010. During this period, the service-producing sector alone is expected to create over 12 million new positions. Along with this growth, 57% of all job openings will be for “Essential Worker positions” and will only require moderate or short term on the job training.

Unskilled and semi-skilled occupations have the highest projected growth rate. The Department of Labor ranked the top 30 occupations with the largest projected job growth from 2001-2010. Of the occupations listed, 16 require unskilled or semi skilled laborers.

The U.S. is not producing enough new workers. More than 60 million current employees will likely retire over the next 30 years. After 2011, the year in which the first of the Baby Boomers turns 65, their retirement rates will reach proportions so huge that, barring unforeseen increases in immigration and/or participation rates among the elderly, there will be a reduction in the total size of the nation’s workforce.

Employers are doing the “right” things. Essential Worker employers have led the way in welfare-to-work, school-to-work and other initiatives that have been successful in reducing welfare rolls and getting graduates jobs, but these efforts still are insufficient. Employers are raising wages, offering improved benefits, signing bonuses and relocation pay.

Question: Isn’t there already a visa category for essential workers that these employers can use?

Answer: Yes and No. The H-2B temporary visa program is useful only for employers who can establish that their need for foreign workers is temporary (seasonal, a one-time occurrence, or a peak load or intermittent need). If the employer’s need is year-round or does not fall into one of the definitions used by the Department of Labor or Immigration Service, the employer cannot use the H-2B classification to fill labor needs. A nonimmigrant visa category does not exist for employers who need workers for more than one year or for employers who have permanent or long-term jobs, for example in the health care, retail, hospitality and other industries. Even for employers with truly temporary needs, the H-2B category backlogged and fraught with bureaucratic red tape that makes it extremely time-consuming and difficult to use. The permanent immigrant category for non-professionals in occupations that require less than two years’ experience is virtually useless; only 5,000 visas are available annually, and the backlog of waiting cases is over ten years long. As a result, employers often are forced to send their work overseas, cut back, or close their doors.

Question: With concerns about national security, is now the time to look at a temporary worker program?

Answer: Yes. A temporary worker program would help control immigration by legalizing the flow of people seeking to enter and leave this country. It would help satisfy the U.S. demand for workers and provide a legal and safe mechanism for workers to enter and leave the U.S.

Question: What needs to be done to be able to increase the number of immigration workers for these types of petitions?

Answer: U.S.-Mexico should resume immigration talks. Just prior to the September 11th attacks, President Fox and President Bush had just begun discussing a migration plan for comprehensive immigration reform between the U.S. and Mexico. Now, a year later, it is time for “los dos amigos” to renew their commitments to one another and resume their discussions on immigration initiatives that will benefit both our countries such as: an earned legalization program; an expanded permanent visa program; an enhanced temporary visa program; border control cooperation and economic development in Mexican immigrant sending regions.

The immigration reform proposal mirrors the recommendations by a bi-national working group from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the Autonomous Technological Institute of Mexico (ITAM) that call for both countries to reach a “grand bargain” that included various legalization measures for undocumented Mexicans in the United States, expanding the legal work visas available to migrants, equalizing the treatment of Mexican citizens under NAFTA immigration provisions, cracking down on immigrant smugglers and preventing dangerous border crossings.

Congress needs to update our immigration laws and policies to reflect the needs of our economy. The United States needs a regulated, workable immigration system that allows foreign nationals to work here when there is evidence of a shortage of available U.S. workers, and that allows those individuals already here and working to obtain legal status. Our laws also should allow those individuals to obtain green cards immediately when there is a permanent job.

Essential Worker Immigration Coalition (EWIC). A coalition of employer associations from sectors of the economy that rely heavily on essential workers, including hospitality, retail, restaurants, construction, recreation, transportation and others (including AILA), has been formed in Washington to work toward a broad solution to the essential worker issue. The agenda of this coalition includes reforming the current temporary visa category (H-2B), creating a new and longer-term nonimmigrant visa for essential workers (similar to H-1B), increasing the available green cards for essential workers and providing for earned adjustment for essential workers already in the U.S.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/essential-workers/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/h1b-2/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/h1b/

https://californiaimmigration.us/cant-get-h-1b-try-o-1

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Is there hope for me in deportation proceedings?

Posted on August 6, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have been in the United States for 13 years and have worked illegally the entire time. My boss just came to me last week and said the Social Security Department has sent him notification that there is something wrong with my Social Security Number and that he must terminate my position. Two days later I got a letter from the Immigration and Naturalization Service that I am in deportation proceedings. Do I have any hope?

Answer: First, the Social Security Department has been getting much stricter on notifying employers when a Social Security Card does not match the employees information. Previously, they had done this only when there was an employer with a large amount of employees who had incorrect information (e.g., fake social security cards.) However, in the current world we live in, they are now sending employers the request for confirmation of the Social Security Card if a single employee’s information does not match. Under the immigration laws, they are then forbidden to keep the employee hired without violating the law.

Unfortunately, you are now in Removal Proceedings and the INS will try to have you deported. Fortunately, the United States has several options for people in Removal (or deportation) Proceedings even if they have worked out of status and are here in the United States illegally. There is what is known as Cancellation of Removal. In order to qualify for this type of relief, you need several things. First, you must have been physically present in the United States for at least ten years. Secondly, you must have good moral character. Finally, you must have an immediate Lawful Permanent Resident Relative or United States Citizen who will suffer extreme hardship if you are deported or removed from the United States.

Question: I do have two United States Citizen Children. However, how would I possibly show or prove that they would suffer extreme hardship if I were deported?

Answer: You have actually hit on the most difficult part of a Cancellation of Removal case. It is showing the extreme hardship. Previously, if you had children that were of at least five or six years old, it was not difficult to prove this issue. Then the Board of Immigration Appeals came out with a case that basically made it incredibly difficult to meet the extreme hardship burden. Recently, the Board of Immigration Appeals has seemed to back off of such a stringent interpretation of the issue of showing extreme hardship. It is known as the Recinas case and was decided less than one month ago. In fact, the exact terminology that you must consider is ‘exceptional and extremely unusual’ hardship. Therefore, the hardship associated with a normal deportation will not suffice. However, under Recinas, you do not need to show that the hardship would be unconscionable. In deciding a Cancellation of Removal claim, consideration and evidence should be given to the age, health and circumstances of the family members. Some of the factors would include how a lower standard of living or adverse country conditions in the country of return might affect those relatives.

Question: What type of factors should I present to show the hardship?

Answer: In addition to the above, try to show all U.S. Citizen family members who interact with your children (such as a Grandmother or Grandfather.) Present evidence on how little knowledge they have of their home country, or how they may not know the language and culture of the home country. Present evidence showing financial, emotional and medical hardships. Also, show that there are no other realistic means for you to ever immigrate to the U.S. again. Basically, it is not easy to obtain Cancellation of Removal, but if all the evidence is presented and all of the different factors are taken into account regarding the hardship, there is a chance you will be granted your Lawful Permanent Residence based upon Cancellation of Removal.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation-proceedings/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/best-deportation-attorney/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation/

https://californiaimmigration.us/removal/winning-a-deportation-proceeding-from-an-immigration-lawyer-and-deportation-attorney

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

New Hope for Aliens in Removal Proceedings

Posted on August 5, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

The Board of Immigration Appeals issued a decision, In re Ariadna Angelica Gonzalez, et al. (23 I & N Dec. 467, Interim Decision #3479, BIA 2002) on September 19, 2002 that seems to ease some of the restrictions on applying for cancellation of removal.

When an alien is placed into removal proceedings (previously referred to as deportation proceedings), there is a type of relief known as cancellation of removal. If the Immigration Judge grants the relief, then the alien will be granted lawful permanent residence in the United States. To qualify for this relief, one must show that he or she has been physically present in the United States for at least ten years prior to being placed into removal proceedings. Next, the alien must show they have good moral character and have not been convicted of certain crimes. Finally, the most difficult element to prove for this type of relief is to show that an immediate family member who is either a United States citizen or Lawful Permanent Resident will suffer exceptional and extremely unusual hardship if the he or she is removed from the United States.

Prior to In re Gonzalez, it appeared as though only those aliens in removal proceedings who had a United States son or daughter who suffered from some type of sever medical trauma would be granted cancellation of removal. Naturally, most people in proceedings could never meet such a high standard. This type of standard was not only restrictive, but unrealistic for most people to meet. Congress has allowed aliens without legal status in removal proceedings to apply for this type of relief. They have intended that long term residents should be given a real chance to be able to continue their lives in the United States without having their families torn apart and separated for years or for the rest of their lives.

The problem is with the term ‘exceptional and extremely unusual hardship.’ Clearly, any family who is separated by removal of one of its members from the United States will suffer hardship. However, for those who want to win the cancellation of removal cases, they must present facts showing that they will suffer exceptional and extremely unusual hardship. When this law was passed under the Immigration and Nationality Act section 240, there were no precedent decisions as to what constitutes this type of hardship. In reality, each Immigration Judge could have their own interpretation as to what type of hardship will fall under this standard. Previously, the Board of Immigration Appeals has issued very harsh decisions as to what constitutes this high standard of hardship. Subsequent to the issuance of those decisions, it has been practically impossible to ever get a grant of cancellation of removal from an Immigration Judge.

In re Gonzalez moves the pendulum back and gives the attorneys and the judges some realistic direction on what constitutes ‘exceptional and extremely unusual hardship’. In this case there was a single mother of six children and no family ties in Mexico. Four of her children were United States citizens. She has lawful permanent resident parents and five of her siblings are United States citizens.

The factors the Board of Immigration Appeals considered in assessing the hardship included the heavy financial burden imposed on her by having to support all of her family in her native country, the lack of any familial support for her children, the lack of any family in her native country, the children’s unfamiliarity with the Spanish language and the unavailability of any other means of immigrating to the United States.

In re Gonzalez makes it clear that ‘unconscionable’ hardship need not be shown. In deciding a cancellation of removal case, the age, health, and other circumstances of the relative must be considered if they are to live in a country with a lower standard of living.

The financial hardship on the alien was a determinative factor. The Board of Immigration Appeals noted that her children were not receiving any type of financial assistance from their father. Additionally, the Board of Immigration Appeals noted that should she be removed from the United States, it would be unlikely that she would be able to legally return to the United States in the foreseeable future.

The Board of Immigration Appeals stated that they must consider the ‘totality of the burden on the entire family’ that would result from the removal of the mother from the United States. Thus, a cumulative analysis must be made as to all of the factors relating to the hardship.

Prior to this decision, getting the Immigration Judge to grant a cancellation of removal was rare. Now, aliens in removal proceedings can present a myriad of evidence to meet the high standard of hardship that their families will suffer if they are removed from the United States.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/cancellation-of-removal/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation-or-removal-hearings/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/removal/

https://californiaimmigration.us/removal

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Title: Any new Immigration Laws?

Posted on July 30, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I know that Congress has a ‘lame-duck’ session now. I was wondering if there were any new and recent developments in the immigration laws.

Answer: There has actually been quite a bit that has been recently signed into law by President Bush. Here is the summary of those recent laws.

On November 2, President Bush signed into law the “21st Century Department of Justice Appropriations Authorization Act.” It includes the following.

Waiver of Foreign Country Residence Requirement with Respect International Medical Graduates. Extends until 2004 the “Conrad State 20” program, which allows states to request waivers of the two-year home residence requirement of INA § 212(e) for certain J–1 physicians who agree to work in medically underserved areas for a period of at least three years, and raises the number of visas available per state from 20 to 30.

Posthumous Citizenship for Non-Citizen Veterans.: Extends the deadline for allowing family members to apply for honorary posthumous citizenship for noncitizen veterans who died while honorably serving the U.S. in past wars.

Extension of H-1B Status for Aliens with Lengthy Adjudications.: Recognizing that lengthy processing times by the Department of Labor have precluded some H-1B visa holders from being eligible to apply for a one-year extension of H status pursuant to the American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act of 2000, this provision is intended to permit aliens who have labor certification applications caught in lengthy agency backlogs to extend status beyond the six-year limitation. As long as 365 days have elapsed since the filing of a labor certification application (that is filed on behalf of or used by the alien) or an immigrant visa petition, H-1B status can be extended in one-year increments. This will be true even if the alien has since changed his or her status or left the country. If an application for a labor certification or adjustment of status or a petition for an immigrant visa petition is denied, the extended H-1B status ends at that point.

Application for Naturalization by Alternative Applicant if Citizen Parent Has Died: Amends the INA to authorize a child’s grandparents or legal guardian to submit an application for naturalization on behalf of the child under section 322 of the INA where the child’s parent, who otherwise would be authorized to submit the petition, died during the preceding five years.

Also on November 2, the President signed the “Border Student Commuter Act of 2002”. The new law amends INA §§ 101(a)(15)(F) and (M) by creating a new border commuter nonimmigrant classification under the F and M visa categories for Canadian and Mexican nationals who maintain residence in their country of nationality and commute to the U.S. for full- or part-time academic or vocational studies. The legislation was triggered by a May 22, 2002, INS proclamation that commuter students residing in contiguous territory would no longer be allowed to enter the U.S. as visitors to attend school on a part-time basis.

President Bush, on October 29, signed the “Persian Gulf POW/MIA War Accountability Act” to provide refugee status to any alien (and his or her spouse or child) who: (1) is a national of Iraq or a nation of the Greater Middle East Region; and (2) personally delivers into the custody of the U.S. government a living American Persian Gulf War prisoner of war or individual missing in action. Excepted from the Act’s benefits are persons who are ineligible for asylum (including terrorists, persecutors, certain criminals, and individuals presenting a danger to the security of the U.S.).

On September 30, President Bush signed the “Foreign Relations Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003” (H.R. 1646, Pub. L. No. 107–228). The Act contains numerous immigration-related provisions, including authorization for $4.97 billion in appropriations for the administration of foreign affairs in fiscal year 2003.

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Immigration Article: Homeland Security Passes (Part I)

Posted on July 28, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have heard that the Homeland Security Bill has passed the House and the Senate. I am confused on know this will effect several people whom I know are in the immigration process. Could you give me some background on what exactly this bill does?

 Answer: First, and foremost, this bill referred to as the “The Homeland Security Act of 2002” creates a new department within the United States Government. The main purpose of this department is to prevent terrorism and to make the United States safer. The bill is enormous. It is over 400 pages and deals with a huge variety of issues. Of course, my response will mainly focus on the immigration issues.

The Immigration and Naturalization Service will cease to exist in its present capacity. If fact, the Homeland Security Bill abolishes the INS. There are two major functions currently in the INS. One is the enforcement division which is concerned with deportation/removal and enforcement of the immigration laws. This part of INS is going to be transferred to what is known as Bureau of Border Security under the Department of Homeland Security. The duties of issuing visas will now be transferred to the Under Secretary for Border and Transportation Security in tandem with the Secretary of State. The issuance of Visas will be headed by the Secretary of Homeland Security.

Question: Are there any other new departments? Specifically, who will rule on applications sent to INS?

 Answer: Section 451 of the Bill creates the establishment of Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services. This sub-department will perform the following functions: 1) Adjudications of immigrant visa petitions; 2) Adjudications of naturalization petitions; 3) Adjudications of asylum and refugee applications; 4) Adjudications performed at service centers; and 5) All other adjudications performed by the Immigration and Naturalization Service.

Question: When do all these provisions go into effect?

 Answer: Again, the INS would look at this as fraud. In fact, if you get married within less than 60 days after entry to the U.S. on the Visitor Visa, you are presumed to have committed fraud. Not only will the application for Lawful Permanent Residency be denied, you could very well get deported because of the fraud.

Question: What are the consequences of doing the change of status right after entering the U.S.?

 Answer: First, they could deny your change of status application and you could go out of status. Next, the INS may very well assume that you committed fraud. That is, when you got the Visitor Visa and entered the U.S. that you did not really intend to visit, but rather, intended to go to school or to work in the United States. If that happens, you could be deported because you committed misrepresentation and fraud. The fraud will stay with you forever and never goes away. If you ever want to reenter the U.S., you will need to get a Fraud Waiver. Those are not easy waivers to obtain.

Question: What is the best way to avoid these drastic consequences?

Answer: First, the way that people come into the U.S. is probably going to change. You must decide whether you want to go to school or work since these are the options you might be considering. If you are intending on going to school, then you should get the I-20 and apply for the Student Visa from your home country. Then, when you enter the U.S., you will be entering as a Student, not a Visitor. Alternatively, if you want to work in the U.S., you should have your sponsor file the petition prior to you getting to the U.S. Therefore, you will not have any allegations by INS that you committed fraud. You need to be very careful if you come to the U.S. with a Visitor Visa and then change your status right away. Obviously, since you only will be getting 30 days in the U.S., you must strongly consider not getting a change of status in the U.S.

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

« Previous Page — Next Page »

  • Brian D. Lerner

    Immigration Lawyer

  • Blog Stats

    • 305,418 Visitors

  • Categories

  • Recent Posts