• Hours & Info

    3233 E. Broadway,
    Long Beach, CA 90803
    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.

  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Can he be bonded out?

Posted on September 15, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have a friend that was taken into deportation and would like to know if he can be bonded out. Can you give me some guidance?

ANSWER: A wide range of INS officials have the power to arrest and detain people. The INS can arrest a person without a warrant if it has “reason to believe that the alien … is in the United States in violation of any [immigration] law or regulation and is likely to escape before a warrant can be obtained for his arrest.”

QUESTION: What happens after a person is arrested on a suspected immigration law violation?

ANSWER: S/he should be examined “without unnecessary delay” by an INS officer on his or her right to enter or remain in the United States. The officer examining the individual after arrest should not be the arresting officer unless another qualifying officer is not available and taking the person before another officer will cause unnecessary delay. If the examining officer finds prima facie evidence that the person arrested has violated the immigration laws, then the officer will place him or her in removal proceedings or institute expedited removal, if applicable.

If the INS places the person in removal proceedings, it should notify him or her of the reasons for his or her arrest. The examining officer should also inform the individual of his or her right to counsel at no expense to the government and provide him or her with a list of free legal service providers. The officer should also warn the person that any statement that s/he makes “may be used against him or her in a subsequent proceeding.”

The INS may hold a person arrested without a warrant for 48 hours or longer “in the event of emergency or other extraordinary circumstances.”12 On or before the conclusion of this period, the INS must determine whether the individual will continue to be detained or released on bond or recognizance. It must also decide whether to issue a Notice to Appear (NTA) and an arrest warrant.13

QUESTION: How does INS determine who should be released and under what conditions?

ANSWER: The local INS District Office (usually the Detention and Deportation Unit) makes the initial custody and bond determinations.14 As long as the s/he is not subject to mandatory detention due to criminal or terrorist grounds, the INS may release the individual on bond or on recognizance.15

In order to be released, a person “must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the officer that such release would not pose a danger to property or persons, and that the alien is likely to appear for any future proceeding.” The factors commonly considered in making the determination to release and/or set bond include: 1) Local family ties;
2) Prior arrests, convictions, appearances at hearings; 3) Membership in community organization; 4) Manner of entry length of time in the United States; 5) Immoral acts or participation in subversive activities; and 6) Financial ability to post bond.

After September 11, the government’s concern about security and intelligence gathering may also play a crucial role in deciding whether a person will be detained or released.

QUESTION: Can a person work once s/he has been released from INS custody?

ANSWER: The person can work as long as s/he is a lawful permanent resident (LPR) or is otherwise authorized to work, such as where s/he has received authorization to work based on a pending adjustment or asylum application.

QUESTION: Can a person challenge the INS’s custody/bond determination?

The regulations prohibit the following groups of people from requesting an Immigration Judge to review the INS’s custody and/or bond determination: 1) those considered to be “arriving aliens”; 2) those charged with being deportable on security, terrorism and related grounds; or 3) those subject to mandatory detention.

Even though an Immigration Judge does not have jurisdiction to redetermine custody and/or bond for the above groups, s/he does have jurisdiction to review whether the INS correctly determined that an individual does in fact belong to one of these groups.

Everyone else may request an Immigration Judge to review the INS’s custody and/or bond decisions at any time until a removal order becomes final. A request for custody and/or bond redetermination may be made orally, in writing, or by telephone, if the Immigration Judge permits in his or her discretion. If the person is detained, the request for custody and/or bond redetermination should be made to the Immigration Court that has jurisdiction over the place of detention. Otherwise, the request should be made to the Immigration Court that has administrative control over the case.

Bonded out

6 months bond

Bond hearing

Immigration bond 

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Are we moving closer to a Police State?

Posted on September 9, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have heard a lot about keeping better track of people from around the world who enter and exit the U.S. Earlier I thought I would never want to live in a country that has an Exit Visa System (like Cuba) and now it seems we may be implementing a similar system. Can you explain?

Answer: Pursuant to the Homeland Security Act of 2002, the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is responsible for establishing an automated entry/exit system. The Department of Homeland Security has made the US-VISIT (United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology) program one of its top priorities. The US-VISIT, the Department’s automated entry/exit system, will expedite legitimate travelers, while making it more difficult for those intending to do us harm to enter our nation. The system is designed to collect, maintain, and share information, including biometric identifiers, through a dynamic system, on foreign nationals to determine whether the individual should be prohibited from entering the U.S.; Can receive, extend, change, or adjust immigration status; Has overstayed their visa; and/or needs special protection/attention (i.e., refugees); and enhance traffic flow for individuals entering or exiting the U.S. for legitimate purposes.

 Question: What is meant by ‘legitimate’ purposes?

Answer: That is a difficult question to answer. While the DHS might believe it knows what ‘legitimate’ purposes means, over time, the definition might be expanded. While this procedure of an exit system does not apply to U.S. Citizens, we never know what might happen in the future. We must not give up our rights to fight for our freedom.

Question: Will there be some sort of identification given?

Answer: Secretary Ridge announced in April that the US-VISIT system will be capable of capturing and reading a biometric identifier at air and sea ports of entry before the end of 2003. This system is said to be capable of scanning travel documents and taking fingerprints and pictures of foreign nationals, which then could be checked against databases to determine whether the individual should be detained or questioned concerning possible terrorist or criminal involvement.

Question: What will the government do with this information?

Answer: The US-VISIT system will be implemented incrementally, but eventually will collect information on the arrival and departure of most foreign nationals such as: date; nationality; classification as an immigrant or non-immigrant; complete name; date of birth; citizenship; sex; passport number and country of issuance; country of residence; U.S. visa number, date and place of issuance (where applicable); alien registration number (where applicable); and complete address while in the United States. The information will be stored in databases maintained by DHS and the Department of State as part of an individual’s travel record.

The other system known as NSEERS is a system implemented to make certain that people in the U.S. who are not U.S. Citizens and are from countries around the world that the U.S. believes is involved in terrorist activities must register with the government before leaving. Again, while most of us do not believe it will affect us at the present time, the U.S. government is doing more and more things to affect the rights of people. That is why we must fight for our fellow immigrants and stand up when we believe that their rights have been violate. We do not know when the government might be at our doorstep.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/hsi-police/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/border-restriction/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/covid-restrictions/

https://californiaimmigration.us/?s=police+state

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

How can I become a U.S. Citizen?

Posted on September 8, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have been in the United States for many years and would like to become a U.S. Citizen. Can you tell me how someone qualifies?

Answer: You may become a U.S. citizen (1) by birth or (2) through naturalization. Generally, people are born U.S. citizens if they are born in the United States or if they are born to U.S. citizens. If you were born in the United States, including, in most cases, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, you are an American citizen at birth. Your birth certificate is proof of your citizenship.

If you were born abroad and both of your parents are U.S. citizens and at least one of your parents lived in the United States at some point in his or her life, then in most cases you are a U.S. citizen.

If you were born abroad and only one of your parents is a U.S. citizen, then in most cases, you are a U.S. citizen if ALL of the following are true: One of your parents was a U.S. citizen when you were born; Your citizen parent lived at least 5 years in the United States before you were born; and at least 2 of these 5 years in the United States were after your citizen parent’s 14th birthday.

If you were born before November 14, 1986, you are a citizen if your U.S. citizen parent lived in the United States for at least 10 years and 5 of those years in the United States were after your citizen parent’s 14th birthday.

Question: If I have my Green Card, how do I become a naturalized citizen?

Answer: If you are not a U.S. citizen by birth or did not acquire U.S. citizenship automatically after birth, you may still be eligible to become a citizen through the normal naturalization process. People who are 18 years and older use the “Application for Naturalization” (Form N-400) to become naturalized. Persons who acquired citizenship from parent(s) while under 18 years of age use the “Application for a Certificate of Citizenship” (Form N-600) to document their citizenship. Qualified children who reside abroad use the “Application for Citizenship and Issuance of Certificate under Section 322” (Form N-600K) to document their naturalization.

Question: What are the requirements for naturalization?

Answer: Basically, you need to have been a permanent resident for at least five years (unless you became a lawful permanent resident through marriage to a U.S. Citizen which changes the time to 3 years) and need to have been physically present in the U.S. for at least 2 ½ of the previous 5 years with no absence for more than 6 months. You must have good moral character and be able to speak, read and write English.

Question: When does my time as a Permanent Resident begin?

Answer: Your time as a Permanent Resident begins on the date you were granted permanent resident status. This date is on your Permanent Resident Card shows where you can find important information like the date your Permanent Residence began.

Question: If I have been convicted of a crime but my record has been expunged, do I need to write that on my application or tell an USCIS officer?

Answer: Yes. You should always be honest with USCIS about all arrests (even if you were not charged or convicted) and convictions (even if your record was cleared or expunged). Even if you have committed a minor crime, USCIS may deny your application if you do not tell the USCIS officer about the incident.

Thus, you might be a U.S. Citizen without knowing it if one of your parents or both are U.S. Citizens. Alternatively, if you have committed a crime, or ineligible for some reason to Naturalize, USCIS might put you into deportation if you wrongfully apply for Naturalization. Therefore, you should make certain you qualify before you apply.

Acquisition of US citizenship

Apply for citizenship

Citizenship

Our Immigration Law Firm

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

The new T Visa for victims of Severe Trafficking

Posted on September 4, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have a friend that has been in a most unfortunate circumstance. She was actually kidnapped from her home and sold into the underground world of sex slaves. Somehow, she escaped and fled to the U.S. She has no higher education or any job skills and no other family in the U.S. Is there anything she can do to stay here in the U.S.?

Answer: Yes, there is a new visa named the T Visa. To qualify, the person must be a victim of severe trafficking in persons. This can be a sex slave as you have mentioned, or it can be other forms of trafficking in persons such as slaves or involuntary servitude of any kind. The services provided must have been done under coercion or force.

Question: What must my friend do to avail herself of this T Visa?

Answer: First, she must be a victim of severe trafficking of persons. Next, she must be physically in the U.S. on account of such trafficking. If she is older than 15 years old, she must have tried to get the law enforcement officials in her home country to try to stop the acts. She must also show that if removed, she will suffer extreme hardship and harm. The application must be filed at the INS Service Center where she is present.

Question: My friend is too young to make it by herself, even if she gets the T Visa. Can her parents come and help and live with her?

Answer: Yes, the family members of a T Visa holder can get what is known as derivative status. This means that the parents and children (if they exist) can apply for the derivative T Visa. This is unique in visas. Normally, the parents do not derive any benefits from a visa obtained by their child. However, in this case, because of the nature of the visa, Congress has sought to allow parents to avail of this relief. The derivative applications must be sent along with the original application by the primary applicant.

Question: How long will my friend be able to stay on T status?

Answer: It can be issued for up to three years. There is no renewing this visa. However, after the three years, your friend can apply for Lawful Permanent Residency. Additionally, as long as the principal applicant (your friend) remains eligible, the family members also on T Visa can apply for Lawful Permanent Residency themselves.

Question: Assuming my friend gets the visa, is she guaranteed to get the Green Card?

Answer: Unfortunately, there is never a guarantee when it comes to immigration. However, in this case, there are specific provisions that allow INS to revoke or take away the visa status. The regulations do not specifically state how or why INS would revoke it, but assumably if the threat no longer exists, or they found out that it was obtained through fraud or misrepresentation, they could decide to revoke the visa. If this happens, they could be removed from the U.S. However, on the whole, this T Visa appears to benefit people who suffer extreme and outrageous conduct by other people. This is the United States stating to the world that anyone who is subjected to this cruelty will be welcome and allowed inside the U.S.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/t-visa-2/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/t-visa-victim-of-severe-trafficking/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/visa-program/

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Immigration Article: Can I be deported?

Posted on September 1, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have been out of status for a number of years. Currently, I have a couple different petitions going forward. Once is a sibling based family petition, and the other is an employment based Labor Certification. I was told that it would take about another three to four years to be able to adjust my status to that of a Lawful Permanent Resident. There have been many news stories of people begin picked up by INS and deported, I am afraid for myself, my wife and my children. Can I just be deported?

Answer: Under most circumstances, the answer is no. Because you are here in the United States, you are allowed the opportunity to go in front of an Immigration Judge. Only if you had a previous deportation order can INS just take you and deport you without giving you a hearing. It is your constitutional right. Unlike many other countries around the world, even if you are not a citizen or a lawful permanent resident of the United States, you are entitled to due process. This means that you have an opportunity to present your case, to question witnesses, to cross examine witnesses who testify against you, to apply for relief or ways of staying permanently in the United States and to appeal decisions of the Immigration Judge that you are not satisfied with.

Question: What exactly might happen?

Answer: Each case is different. However, if you are targeted by INS, you should be served with what is known as a Notice to Appear. This is the beginning of the process. You might be taken into custody upon which you would be able to try to get a Bond Redetermination Hearing to get bonded out or become free while the immigration case is going forward. Then, over the next six months to two years, you will present your case in front of the Immigration Judge with the hope of winning.

Question: Am I entitled to an attorney?

Answer: Yes. You have every right to have an attorney represent you through these proceedings. However, unlike criminal cases, you must pay for the attorney to help you. The State will not provide one free of charge.

Question: How can the U.S. Constitution protect someone in my position?

Answer: Because the U.S. Constitution gives people their rights as free persons in this country. If the U.S. Government were to just pick someone up and deport them, there would not be any safeguards against possible mistakes they may make. Also, the law allows people who are out of status to obtain their Green Cards based upon certain criteria. The government allows you to present that evidence. Just remember that this is the best country in the world to live in (no offense to those people elsewhere) and one reason it is such a great place to live is because individual rights are valued and treasured by our Constitution.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/best-deportation-attorney/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation-attorney/

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Immigration Article: What did we celebrate on July 4th?

Posted on August 28, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I became a Lawful Permanent Resident several years ago, and am very grateful. However, there are several persons that I know that are not so lucky. They are still fighting to obtain legal residency in the U.S. Some are in deportation proceedings. Some are hiding in the shadows of America. Some are fearing everywhere they go. Are there any new leaders in Congress and should we give thanks of an elusive freedom that is so difficult to obtain?

 Answer: Recently, the President of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) wrote on this subject. I think it best to simply quote him. He states:

‘From the moment that terrorists attacked the United States last September, AILA has consistently supported measures legitimately required to guarantee our national security without eroding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

 AILA gratefully recognized President George W. Bush’s leadership when he reminded the nation that neither the Arabic community in the United States, nor the members of the Islamic faith throughout the world, are in any way responsible for the terrorist acts of criminals. And AILA called on leaders from both sides of the aisle to put the national interest above partisan considerations.

 Midterm Congressional elections are eminent, and the siren song of perceived political advantage has started to separate the opportunists from the statesmen. Events of the last few days have, as they say, given opportunism a bad name.

On June 20, the Dallas Morning Herald quoted Representative George Gekas, Chair of the House Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims (noting Census Bureau estimates that the undocumented population tops 8 million), as saying: “There are thousands among those millions, perhaps millions among those millions, who have exactly that kind of mind set . . . to become terrorists.”

Term limits resulted in Lamar Smith relinquishing the Immigration Subcommittee Chair in 2000. While never an immigration advocate, George Gekas, it was said, was no Lamar Smith. Could he possibly believe that there are millions of terrorists lurking among us? Had the Chair misspoken or had he unearthed an opportunist’s play book and thus signaled a sea change? Perhaps significantly, Mr. Gekas retained Smith’s subcommittee staff. And, to Mr. Gekas’s evident surprise, reapportionment has made his District more competitive, thus resulting in a serious challenge; he now must fight to win an 11th term.

Our answer came soon enough. On June 26, 2002, Mr. Gekas introduced the “Securing America’s Future through Enforcement Reform (SAFER) Act” (H.R. 5013).

SAFER is a cynical amalgam. It is over 200 pages long, but much of it can be categorized as: (1) piling on (in increasing penalties for offenses that may already be substantial); (2) redundant; and (3) grandstanding (taking credit for proposals that may eventually be enacted in other legislation). To be sure, SAFER contains some novel twists that are more than a little offensive and more than a little dangerous. (Mr. Gekas’s summary of SAFER was posted on the News Flash section of InfoNet and will remain available as Doc. No. 02062731; the text of the full bill will be posted as soon as it becomes available.) Legislatively, SAFER is irresponsible, but as its sponsors well know, it is also DOA. However, that is not the point. The point is that the political calculations were made and Representative Gekas cast his lot; he has bought FAIR’s agenda of Fear and Loathing wholesale.

 This week we celebrate our independence. The first July 4th after September 11, 2001 promises to be especially poignant. It is a particularly appropriate time to rejoice in America’s liberty and diversity and to remember the sacrifices of our people, who for four centuries, have come to these shores from every corner of the world to cultivate, nurture and defend our freedom and way of life. America is immigrants and the children of immigrants. This year a second day is just as important as July 4th to validate and affirm our nation’s freedom: our election day, Tuesday, November 5.

 I trust that on this July 4th we will hear and think a lot about fundamental American values. Between now and November 5 we must redouble our efforts to preserve these values. No one is better equipped to rebut anti-immigrant rhetoric than AILA attorneys. Don’t let mindless or hateful rhetoric go unchallenged. Write Opinion pieces and Letters to the Editor and be proactive in encouraging your clients to do the same. Go back to the basics–actively support candidates who have the courage to stand up for fundamental American values, immigrant rights and the rule of law. Encourage each of your eligible clients to naturalize, to register, and to vote. (A brochure, in both English and Spanish, with state-by-state voter registration information can be found on the InfoNet–go to “Advocacy Center,” then click on “Take Action” followed by “Vote Drive”). And oppose the politicians who have cynically chosen to use this moment of national crisis to undermine our heritage as a nation of immigrants, who would curtail the fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution. Write a check, support our friends and be sure that our foes pay the price. The tools you need are at your fingertips, through InfoNet.

The late North Carolina Congressman Richardson Preyer would began a campaign by telling the troops “It’s bumper sticker, door bell ringing time again.” So it is. Let us begin.’

Let us never take for granted the freedoms which we enjoy. There are people in our very backyard who will attempt to limit those freedoms and take them away from us.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation-attorney/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation-proceedings/

https://californiaimmigration.us/removal/winning-a-deportation-proceeding-from-an-immigration-lawyer-and-deportation-attorney

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , | Leave a comment »

HOMELAND SECURITY. WHAT DOES IT MEAN?

Posted on August 26, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have different petitions going through for my family. Other relatives are unfortunately in Removal/Deportation Proceedings. I understand that government is planning on restructuring certain departments. Will they restructure INS, and if so, what does that mean for us?

Answer: It appears as though either some or all of INS will be part of the new cabinet level division of the government. It will be known as Homeland Security. However, if it is done in a rash manner without giving the immigrants their rights, then it will hurt those immigrants trying to get her legally and to become legal in the future.

An effective, efficient, and fair immigration system is crucial to our national security and is fundamental to which we are as a people and as a nation of immigrants. Our immigration system must be reorganized. Our immigration system needs to be restructured on the basis of longstanding principles outlined by lawmakers, policy experts, and immigrant advocates.

These principles include: coordinating the separated enforcement and service functions, placing a strong leader in charge of both functions, and adequately funding enforcement and services.

If our immigration functions are included in the new Homeland Security Department, they must be reorganized within a separate division headed by a strong leader.

Question: What exactly will this new department do?

It is unclear at this time exactly what will happen and when it will happen. However, a new division, Immigration Services and Security, should be created within the Department of Homeland Security, headed by an Undersecretary who is knowledgeable about both services and enforcement. Immigration Services and Security should be made up of three sections: Immigration Services, Border Security, and Interior Security.

To enhance our security and support our border functions, a Transportation and Commercial Goods Security division also should be created. This division, along with the Immigration Services and Security division, would replace the proposed Border and Transportation Security Division.

The proposed Homeland Security Department must address concerns about civil rights, oversight, privacy, due process, and visa processing. The new agency must include an office to ensure that the constitutional and civil rights of all persons are protected as the agency carries out its national security mandates.

Policy development for visa issuance needs to remain a function of the State Department to avoid the chaos that would result from separating policy and process and to best address our foreign policy and U.S. business interests.

The Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR) must remain outside of the Department of Homeland Security, and be constituted as an independent agency in order to guarantee the impartiality and checks and balances of our justice system. Otherwise, it will be as though the Prosecutor is both the opposing attorney and the judge on the same case.

In order for any reform to be effective, Congress must take the time to get it right, overhaul our immigration laws, and protect both our nation and our values and traditions.

Creating a Department of Homeland Security is an enormous undertaking, and Congress must take the time to get it right. We cannot afford the mistakes and oversights of a hasty examination. There is too much at stake.

Department of homeland security

DHS meaning

Homeland security

Immigration reform and DHS

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

A new way to beat Deportation

Posted on August 21, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have been here in the U.S. since I was six years old. About 12 years ago, I committed a drug crime of possession for sale. I was sentenced to 4 months. Now, all these years later, I have been put into removal proceedings where INS is trying to deport me. I have been told that I am an aggravated felon and there is nothing I can do. I have further been told that I will most likely be deported away from my family including my U.S. Citizen spouse and three U.S. Citizen Children. I have never done anything else criminally and it was just a stupid mistake when I was young. I have changed, have a good job, a family with U.S. Citizens and many community ties. Is there anything I can do?

Answer: As the law stands now, there is very little you can do. This is a result of the 1996 laws which increased dramatically the laws on what was considered to be an aggravated felony. It has torn families apart for many years since 1996. People who have become long term residents in the U.S. and have their Green Cards found out it did not make any difference. They were still deported. Furthermore, they found out that they were barred from coming back into the U.S. for the rest of their lives. Congress has seen all the suffering caused by the unfair and anti-immigration laws of 1996 and just this week the House Judiciary Committee passed the 2002 Due Process Reform Bill. While it still must be passed by the Senate and signed by the President, it is an excellent step in giving back some of the due process rights lost by long term residents who were put in deportation proceedings because of various crimes.

Question: How does this particular bill help me?

Answer: Please note that the Senate might change some of the provisions, or the President might require some alternate items in the bill. However, as the bill stands now, it applies specifically to people who previously had their Green Cards. They were or are going to be placed into deportation or removal proceedings because of a crime they committed. They are considered to be an aggravated felons and do not qualify for the normal Cancellation of Removal.

Question: What is Cancellation of Removal?

Answer: Prior to this bill there was a section of the bill referred to as Cancellation of Removal for Certain Lawful Permanent Residents. Generally, you had to have your Green Card for at least five-years and be physically present in the U.S. for at least seven-years. Finally, and this is the item that disqualified numerous people, is that you cannot be convicted of an aggravated felony.

Question: What does the new bill allow?

Answer: Basically it deals with the Cancellation of Removal for people who have committed aggravated felonies. In the new bill, it expands the Cancellation of Removal so that it allows people whom have been convicted of aggravated felonies to still keep their Green Cards and stay in the U.S. It deals with three different scenarios. First, people who have been convicted of a non violent aggravated felony. Second, people who were convicted of a violent aggravated felony. Finally, people who have been convicted of an aggravated felony and came to the U.S. as a young child. Each of these provisions allows a person to remain in the U.S. and to not be deported if the Judge grants the Cancellation of Removal. Therefore, this is a very big step toward restoring some of the harsh anti-immigrant provisions of the 1996 law. Hopefully, this trend will continue so that families can be reunited and the tearing apart of immigrant families will stop. .

Abstenia deportation

Best deportation lawyer

Deportation proceedings

How to win a deportation

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Title: The BIA. Just a stepping stone.

Posted on August 17, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I lost my case at the Immigration Court. I understand that I have many issues that I can appeal and that there is a very reasonable chance that I could win. Can you let me know where my appeal goes and what might happen?

Answer: There are many Immigration Courts in the U.S. All together there are about 55 Immigration Courts through all 50 States as well as in Puerto Rico. Whenever you lose at the Immigration Court level, you appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals or the BIA. There is only one BIA in the entire United States. The BIA is located in Virginia and handles all of the appeals of every Immigration Court throughout the entire United States.

The Notice of Appeal must be in the hands of the BIA no later than 30 days after issuance of the decision from the Immigration Judge. Afterwards, it goes to a panel of three of the members of the Board of Immigration Appeals and in about one year the decision is issued.

Question: I have heard that there will be some changes at the BIA. Is that true and what are they?

Answer: Yes it is true. The changes are not for the better. In fact, the changes will make the appeal process to the BIA an exercise in futility and will deny numerous rights to immigrants and their rights to appeal. Attorney General Ashcroft has just issued regulations to go into effect later this month that will change some of the basic ways that the BIA decides cases. First, they will no longer make a three member panel to decide cases, but only one member will decide. Only on cases of novel importance or ones that are unusually complicated will it be referred to a three member panel. Who decides if a case is novel or unusual is unclear. In all other real appeals (other than the new BIA regulations) it goes to a three member panel. This gives the person appealing the knowledge and satisfaction that the appeal will be decided among three qualified persons who must come to a consensus. Now, the appeal at the BIA, for the most part, is in the hands of one person. This item by itself takes away much of the due process and fairness to the immigrant.

Next, there is now a timetable that is set for deciding the case. Thus, rather than taking the necessary time to properly decide the case, the Attorney General has mandated that the cases take around 6 months. Thus, again there is a violation of the Due Process rights of immigrants. An appeal should not have as its primary importance the number of days or months it must be decided. What this will do is make a single member rush through cases to make sure that the timetable is met, rather than the case being decided on its merits.

Question: What will happen if the BIA denies the case?

Answer: In reality, that is what will happen in most cases. Because of these new regulations, and because of the violation of Constitutional Due Process rights, people will simply use the BIA as a stepping stone to get to the real appeal. Once the BIA denies the case, it can be appealed directly to a Circuit Appellate Court of the United States. These courts are right below the U.S. Supreme Court. In these appeals, there will be a three judge panel and they will give a real chance to have the case heard on the merits. Do not give up with these new regulations. Just keep fighting until you get to the Circuit Courts, and hopefully, we can restore the immigrant rights that have been lost.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/appeal-to-bia/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia-board-of-immigration-appeals/

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Title: ESSENTIAL WORKERS HELP OUR ECONOMY Part II

Posted on August 12, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: What are Essential Workers?

Answer: “Essential Workers” are the unskilled and semi-skilled workers employed in all sectors of our economy. Essential workers include restaurant workers, retail clerks, construction trades people, manufacturing line workers, hotel service workers, food production workers, landscape workers, and health care aids. It includes a multitude of other types of professions. These individuals often work in the jobs that many Americans do not choose, but which are “essential” to keep our economy and our country growing.

Question: Are there not enough U.S. workers for these jobs?

Answer: The demographics say no. By 2010, total civilian employment is projected to be 167.8 million, but the total civilian labor force is expected to be 158 million, more than nine million more jobs than people.

New jobs will increase dramatically by 2010, boosting the demand for Essential Workers. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) projections indicate that the U.S. will create 22 million new jobs by 2010. During this period, the service-producing sector alone is expected to create over 12 million new positions. Along with this growth, 57% of all job openings will be for “Essential Worker positions” and will only require moderate or short term on the job training.

Unskilled and semi-skilled occupations have the highest projected growth rate. The Department of Labor ranked the top 30 occupations with the largest projected job growth from 2001-2010. Of the occupations listed, 16 require unskilled or semi skilled laborers.

The U.S. is not producing enough new workers. More than 60 million current employees will likely retire over the next 30 years. After 2011, the year in which the first of the Baby Boomers turns 65, their retirement rates will reach proportions so huge that, barring unforeseen increases in immigration and/or participation rates among the elderly, there will be a reduction in the total size of the nation’s workforce.

Employers are doing the “right” things. Essential Worker employers have led the way in welfare-to-work, school-to-work and other initiatives that have been successful in reducing welfare rolls and getting graduates jobs, but these efforts still are insufficient. Employers are raising wages, offering improved benefits, signing bonuses and relocation pay.

Question: Isn’t there already a visa category for essential workers that these employers can use?

Answer: Yes and No. The H-2B temporary visa program is useful only for employers who can establish that their need for foreign workers is temporary (seasonal, a one-time occurrence, or a peak load or intermittent need). If the employer’s need is year-round or does not fall into one of the definitions used by the Department of Labor or Immigration Service, the employer cannot use the H-2B classification to fill labor needs. A nonimmigrant visa category does not exist for employers who need workers for more than one year or for employers who have permanent or long-term jobs, for example in the health care, retail, hospitality and other industries. Even for employers with truly temporary needs, the H-2B category backlogged and fraught with bureaucratic red tape that makes it extremely time-consuming and difficult to use. The permanent immigrant category for non-professionals in occupations that require less than two years’ experience is virtually useless; only 5,000 visas are available annually, and the backlog of waiting cases is over ten years long. As a result, employers often are forced to send their work overseas, cut back, or close their doors.

Question: With concerns about national security, is now the time to look at a temporary worker program?

Answer: Yes. A temporary worker program would help control immigration by legalizing the flow of people seeking to enter and leave this country. It would help satisfy the U.S. demand for workers and provide a legal and safe mechanism for workers to enter and leave the U.S.

Question: What needs to be done to be able to increase the number of immigration workers for these types of petitions?

Answer: U.S.-Mexico should resume immigration talks. Just prior to the September 11th attacks, President Fox and President Bush had just begun discussing a migration plan for comprehensive immigration reform between the U.S. and Mexico. Now, a year later, it is time for “los dos amigos” to renew their commitments to one another and resume their discussions on immigration initiatives that will benefit both our countries such as: an earned legalization program; an expanded permanent visa program; an enhanced temporary visa program; border control cooperation and economic development in Mexican immigrant sending regions.

The immigration reform proposal mirrors the recommendations by a bi-national working group from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the Autonomous Technological Institute of Mexico (ITAM) that call for both countries to reach a “grand bargain” that included various legalization measures for undocumented Mexicans in the United States, expanding the legal work visas available to migrants, equalizing the treatment of Mexican citizens under NAFTA immigration provisions, cracking down on immigrant smugglers and preventing dangerous border crossings.

Congress needs to update our immigration laws and policies to reflect the needs of our economy. The United States needs a regulated, workable immigration system that allows foreign nationals to work here when there is evidence of a shortage of available U.S. workers, and that allows those individuals already here and working to obtain legal status. Our laws also should allow those individuals to obtain green cards immediately when there is a permanent job.

Essential Worker Immigration Coalition (EWIC). A coalition of employer associations from sectors of the economy that rely heavily on essential workers, including hospitality, retail, restaurants, construction, recreation, transportation and others (including AILA), has been formed in Washington to work toward a broad solution to the essential worker issue. The agenda of this coalition includes reforming the current temporary visa category (H-2B), creating a new and longer-term nonimmigrant visa for essential workers (similar to H-1B), increasing the available green cards for essential workers and providing for earned adjustment for essential workers already in the U.S.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/essential-workers/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/h1b-2/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/h1b/

https://californiaimmigration.us/cant-get-h-1b-try-o-1

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

« Previous Page — Next Page »

  • Brian D. Lerner

    Immigration Lawyer

  • Blog Stats

    • 299,713 Visitors

  • Categories

  • Recent Posts