The Ninth Circuit granted in part and denied in part the petition for review, holding that petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim did not warrant equitable tolling of the limitations period for his untimely filed motion to reopen. However, the court also found that the BIA’s decision declining to exercise its sua sponte authority to reopen proceedings was based on an erroneous understanding of the legal principles concerning the relationship between prior deportation, reopening of deportation proceedings, and eligibility for INA §212(c) relief.
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/sua-sponte/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/decision-on-review-of-sua-sponte-reopening/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/sua-sponte-reopening/
https://californiaimmigration.us/motion-to-reopen-granted-for-religious-person/
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: Deportation, iac, ineffective assistance of counsel, sua sponte reopening | Leave a comment »
