Posted on February 1, 2016 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
- The BIA ruled that the 10 years of continuous physical presence required by 8 CFR §1240.66(c)(2) for an individual seeking special rule cancellation of removal under the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (NACARA) should be measured from the individual’s most recently incurred ground of removal, at least where that ground is among those listed in 8 CFR §1240.66(c)(1).
Nicaragua immigration
Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American relief act
Adjustment relief
Another win from the Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner
Filed under: Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (NACARA) | Tagged: Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, NACARA, Nicaragua, special cancellation of removal | Leave a comment »
Posted on January 23, 2016 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Cancellation of Removal application approved for 20-year-old client with a federal felony conviction for manufacturing explosives materials. Our office was able to reach an agreement with the Department of Homeland Security and our client’s application was approved without the need for any testimony and Client was released from custody after only two hearings, just in time for the holidays.
Cancellation of removal
Special cancellation of removal
Applications for withholding of removal
How a deportation attorney can help you win a cancellation of removal for Non-Permanent residents
Filed under: Cancellation of Removal | Tagged: cancellation, cancellation for removal, Cancellation of Removal, criminal history, removability, Removal, removal order, removal orders, Removal Proceedings, special cancellation of removal | Leave a comment »
Posted on August 30, 2010 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Posted on May 6, 2010 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Another immigration case about an IJ who did not let sufficient evidence in: Immigration judge denied petitioner a full and fair hearing where judge unreasonably limited testimony on whether removal “would result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” to petitioner’s 4-year-old U.S.-citizen child and denied request for a continuance, prejudicing petitioner’s ability to present evidence in support of her application for cancellation of removal.
Rendon v. Holder – filed December 2, 2009, amended May 3, 2010
Cite as 06-70301
Cancelation of removal
Removal and immigration
Removal proceedings
How a deportation Attorney can help you
Filed under: Cancellation of Removal | Tagged: cancellation for removal, Cancellation of Removal, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, special cancellation of removal | Leave a comment »