The Tenth Circuit followed Matter of Strydom, holding that violation of an order prohibiting contact with a potential victim satisfies the requirements of INA §237(a)(2)(E)(ii), which provides that a permanent resident is removable if he or she “violates the portion of a protection order that involves protection against credible threats of violence, repeated harassment, or bodily injury.” Accordingly, the court found that the permanent resident petitioner was removable under the statute.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney, removeability | Tagged: deportability, protective order, removability | Leave a comment »
Brian D. Lerner Immigration Attorney & Deportation Lawyer Blog 