• Hours & Info

    3233 E. Broadway,
    Long Beach, CA 90803
    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.

  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Title: Can I win the Lottery?

Posted on August 27, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have heard a lot about the Diversity Lottery. Can you explain what that is?

Answer: Yes. The diversity lottery is very much what its name implies. It is a lottery that people enter in order to get picked by the United States and to become Lawful Permanent Residents of the United States. It makes available 50,000 permanent resident visas annually to persons from countries with low rates of immigration to the United States. Approximately 111,000 applicants have been registered and notified and may now make an application for an immigrant visa. Since it is likely that some of the first 50,000 persons registered will not pursue their cases to visa issuance, this larger figure should insure that all DV-2004 numbers will be used during fiscal year 2004 (October 1, 2003 until September 30, 2004).

Question: How exactly does it work?

Answer: Applicants registered for the DV-2004 program were selected at random from the approximately 7.3 million qualified entries received during the one-month application period that ran from Noon on October 7, 2002 through Noon on November 6, 2002. An additional 2.9 million applications were either received outside of the mail-in period or were disqualified for failing to properly follow directions. The visas have been apportioned among six geographic regions, with a maximum of seven percent available to persons born in any single country.

Question: If someone is selected for the lottery, are there any qualifications that need to be presented?

Answer: During the visa interview, principal applicants must provide proof of a high school education or its equivalent or show two years of work experience in an occupation that requires at least two years of training or experience within the past five years. Those selected will need to act on their immigrant visa applications quickly. Applicants should follow the instructions in their notification letter and must fully complete the information requested.

Question: Does someone from the Philippines qualify to enter the Diversity Lottery?

Answer: Unfortunately not. The Philippines has a high rate of immigration to the United States, and therefore, they will not qualify. However, spouses from qualifying countries can apply. Also, friends from other countries should take advantage of this program.

Question: When does the next Diversity Lottery begin?

Answer: They may try for the upcoming DV-2005 lottery if they wish. The exact dates for the mail-in period for the DV-2005 lottery program will be widely publicized during August 2003. Normally, the mail-in period is for one month beginning sometime in October.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/diverse-lottery/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/diversity-lottery-dv/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/lottery/

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , | Leave a comment »

HOMELAND SECURITY. WHAT DOES IT MEAN?

Posted on August 26, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have different petitions going through for my family. Other relatives are unfortunately in Removal/Deportation Proceedings. I understand that government is planning on restructuring certain departments. Will they restructure INS, and if so, what does that mean for us?

Answer: It appears as though either some or all of INS will be part of the new cabinet level division of the government. It will be known as Homeland Security. However, if it is done in a rash manner without giving the immigrants their rights, then it will hurt those immigrants trying to get her legally and to become legal in the future.

An effective, efficient, and fair immigration system is crucial to our national security and is fundamental to which we are as a people and as a nation of immigrants. Our immigration system must be reorganized. Our immigration system needs to be restructured on the basis of longstanding principles outlined by lawmakers, policy experts, and immigrant advocates.

These principles include: coordinating the separated enforcement and service functions, placing a strong leader in charge of both functions, and adequately funding enforcement and services.

If our immigration functions are included in the new Homeland Security Department, they must be reorganized within a separate division headed by a strong leader.

Question: What exactly will this new department do?

It is unclear at this time exactly what will happen and when it will happen. However, a new division, Immigration Services and Security, should be created within the Department of Homeland Security, headed by an Undersecretary who is knowledgeable about both services and enforcement. Immigration Services and Security should be made up of three sections: Immigration Services, Border Security, and Interior Security.

To enhance our security and support our border functions, a Transportation and Commercial Goods Security division also should be created. This division, along with the Immigration Services and Security division, would replace the proposed Border and Transportation Security Division.

The proposed Homeland Security Department must address concerns about civil rights, oversight, privacy, due process, and visa processing. The new agency must include an office to ensure that the constitutional and civil rights of all persons are protected as the agency carries out its national security mandates.

Policy development for visa issuance needs to remain a function of the State Department to avoid the chaos that would result from separating policy and process and to best address our foreign policy and U.S. business interests.

The Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR) must remain outside of the Department of Homeland Security, and be constituted as an independent agency in order to guarantee the impartiality and checks and balances of our justice system. Otherwise, it will be as though the Prosecutor is both the opposing attorney and the judge on the same case.

In order for any reform to be effective, Congress must take the time to get it right, overhaul our immigration laws, and protect both our nation and our values and traditions.

Creating a Department of Homeland Security is an enormous undertaking, and Congress must take the time to get it right. We cannot afford the mistakes and oversights of a hasty examination. There is too much at stake.

Department of homeland security

DHS meaning

Homeland security

Immigration reform and DHS

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

A new way to beat Deportation

Posted on August 21, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have been here in the U.S. since I was six years old. About 12 years ago, I committed a drug crime of possession for sale. I was sentenced to 4 months. Now, all these years later, I have been put into removal proceedings where INS is trying to deport me. I have been told that I am an aggravated felon and there is nothing I can do. I have further been told that I will most likely be deported away from my family including my U.S. Citizen spouse and three U.S. Citizen Children. I have never done anything else criminally and it was just a stupid mistake when I was young. I have changed, have a good job, a family with U.S. Citizens and many community ties. Is there anything I can do?

Answer: As the law stands now, there is very little you can do. This is a result of the 1996 laws which increased dramatically the laws on what was considered to be an aggravated felony. It has torn families apart for many years since 1996. People who have become long term residents in the U.S. and have their Green Cards found out it did not make any difference. They were still deported. Furthermore, they found out that they were barred from coming back into the U.S. for the rest of their lives. Congress has seen all the suffering caused by the unfair and anti-immigration laws of 1996 and just this week the House Judiciary Committee passed the 2002 Due Process Reform Bill. While it still must be passed by the Senate and signed by the President, it is an excellent step in giving back some of the due process rights lost by long term residents who were put in deportation proceedings because of various crimes.

Question: How does this particular bill help me?

Answer: Please note that the Senate might change some of the provisions, or the President might require some alternate items in the bill. However, as the bill stands now, it applies specifically to people who previously had their Green Cards. They were or are going to be placed into deportation or removal proceedings because of a crime they committed. They are considered to be an aggravated felons and do not qualify for the normal Cancellation of Removal.

Question: What is Cancellation of Removal?

Answer: Prior to this bill there was a section of the bill referred to as Cancellation of Removal for Certain Lawful Permanent Residents. Generally, you had to have your Green Card for at least five-years and be physically present in the U.S. for at least seven-years. Finally, and this is the item that disqualified numerous people, is that you cannot be convicted of an aggravated felony.

Question: What does the new bill allow?

Answer: Basically it deals with the Cancellation of Removal for people who have committed aggravated felonies. In the new bill, it expands the Cancellation of Removal so that it allows people whom have been convicted of aggravated felonies to still keep their Green Cards and stay in the U.S. It deals with three different scenarios. First, people who have been convicted of a non violent aggravated felony. Second, people who were convicted of a violent aggravated felony. Finally, people who have been convicted of an aggravated felony and came to the U.S. as a young child. Each of these provisions allows a person to remain in the U.S. and to not be deported if the Judge grants the Cancellation of Removal. Therefore, this is a very big step toward restoring some of the harsh anti-immigrant provisions of the 1996 law. Hopefully, this trend will continue so that families can be reunited and the tearing apart of immigrant families will stop. .

Abstenia deportation

Best deportation lawyer

Deportation proceedings

How to win a deportation

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Title: Employment Based Petitions Just Got Faster

Posted on August 20, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I filed a Labor Certification several years ago and it has just been certified. Now I am told that I must file the I-140 or Employment based petition. Additionally, I am told that only afterwards can I file the Adjustment of Status Petition. I urgently need to work and to leave the U.S., but cannot because it will take a considerable amount of time to process the I-140. Is there anything I can do to speed up the process?

Answer: Yes. You are very fortunate as new regulations were just passed by the Immigration and Naturalization Service which allow concurrent filings in certain situations for the I-140 Employment Petition and the I-485 Adjustment of Status Applications.

Question: Why Is the Service Issuing This Rule?

Answer: This interim rule is necessary to improve both efficiency and customer service, and to support the Service’s long-established goals for filing of petitions and applications via direct mail. Currently, as you are aware, an alien can only submit Form I-485 after the alien has had his or her underlying visa petition, Form I-140, approved, and when an immigrant visa is immediately available. Due to these requirements there has been a delay from the time the Form I-140 is filed with the Service until the alien worker, for whom a visa is otherwise immediately available, can properly file Form I-485 with the Service. The most practical and efficient way to eliminate this delay is to permit concurrent filing of Form I-485 together with Form I-140 in cases in which a visa is immediately available. Concurrent filing eliminates the delay that takes place between approval of Form I-140 and the subsequent filing of Form I-485. This interim rule provides for such concurrent filing.

Question: Does This Interim Rule Change or Amend the Substantive Eligibility Requirements for the Visa Petition or Permanent Residence Applications?

Answer: No, this interim rule does not change the current substantive requirements governing eligibility for and adjudication of the Form I-140 nor for the Form I-485.

Question: Who Is Eligible to File Forms I-140 and I-485 Concurrently?

Answer: Forms I-140 and I-485 may be filed concurrently only when an immigrant visa number is immediately available. This interim rule does not change the existing requirement that a visa number must be immediately available before an alien can apply for permanent resident status.

Question: If a Form I-140 Visa Petition Previously Filed for an Alien Worker Is Still Pending with the Service on or After the Date this Rule was published, and a Visa Number is immediately available, can the alien file Form I-485?

Answer: Yes, upon issuance of this rule, an alien whose Form I-140 visa petition is pending with the Service may file Form I-485, together with associated forms and fees, with the Service office at which the visa petition was filed. When filing Form I-485, the alien will be required to attach a copy of the Form I-797, Notice of Action, establishing previous receipt and acceptance by the Service of the underlying Form I-140 visa petition. When an immigrant visa is immediately available, Form I-485 may be filed either concurrently with the Form I-140 or anytime thereafter.

This is a very nice development from the Immigration and Naturalization Service. It will make both their adjudication more efficient, and persons whom want to work sooner on employment based visas will be able to do so considerably quicker than before.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/employment-based-immigration/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/employment-based-immigration-attorney/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/employment-based-petition/

https://californiaimmigration.us/family-and-employment-based-applicants-on-the-rise

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Title:How to Age-out without having to Age-out

Posted on August 19, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: My mother filed a petition for me some years back. I will be 21 years old in September of this year. My understanding is that I am now an immediate relative which allows me to come into the U.S. right away when the Visa Number becomes current. However, once I am over 21 years old, I understand that I will move to a different preference and could actually wait over 10 years to be reunited with my mother. Is this true and is there anything I can do?

Answer: First, you are correct in your current assessment of the situation. However, the President of the United States has just signed a bill which will be most beneficial to those who will ‘age-out’. This is a term for a person whom is about to turn 21 years old and not be eligible for ‘immediate relative status’. The new bill is referred to as the Child Status Protection Act.

Question: What exactly is an Immediate Relative and how does this bill help me?

Answer: An Immediate Relative are those relationships that the U.S. Government deems so important that it does not place any numerical limitation on those who qualify and the only waiting someone has to do for this category is processing time. Other than immediate relatives, there are several other types of petitions that people must wait years for the visa number to become current. Examples of immediate relative petitions are spouses of U.S. Citizens, children whom are unmarried and under 21 years old of U.S. Citizens and parents of U.S. Citizens over the age of 21 years old. Normally, the beneficiary must obtain their Green Card BEFORE they turn 21 years old if it is a child.

Now, based upon the Child Protection Status Act, if the petition was filed for a child, the age of the child is determined when the petition is FILED, not when it is approved.

If the petition was filed based upon a Lawful Permanent Resident parent petitioning a child, they must usually wait many years. Once the parent naturalizes and becomes a U.S. Citizen, then an immediate relative petition can be filed. In this new law, the age of the child at the time the parent naturalizes is what determines immediate relative status, not the time at which the petition is approved. Therefore, for you, your mother must see if she qualifies to become a U.S. Citizen, and apply for Naturalization right away. She should try to get it expedited.

If a married son or daughter of a U.S. Citizen gets divorced and the petition is converted to single child under 21 of a U.S. Citizen, the date the married son or daughter gets divorced is the date to determine if he or she is an immediate relative, not the date the converted petition would get approved.

Question: I have a child who is 3 years old. Assuming I qualify for this new law, what about my daughter?

Answer: Fortunately, the new law also takes care of this type of situation. If a spouse or child is not considered to be an immediate relative themselves, they can apply under this new law to join the spouse or parent as in your case.

As you can see, the U.S. Government has taken significant steps toward helping to unify the Family Unity. This is an excellent piece of legislation and hopefully will be used to its fullest extent.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/child-citizenshjip-protection-act/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/child-status-protection-act/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/equal-protection/

https://californiaimmigration.us/family-petitions-to-immigrate-family-members/child-status

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Title: My mother became a U.S. Citizen and now I have to wait 5 more years

Posted on August 18, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: My mother filed a petition for me some years back. I am from the Philippines. She was a Lawful Permanent Resident at the time. Just last year she became a U.S. Citizen. I was sure that now it would take faster for me to get my Green Card. Unfortunately when I called, they told me that the Philippines, unlike the rest of the world has too much of a backlog on that category, and that it would take about 5 years longer because my mother became a U.S. Citizen. I think that is so unfair. Is there anything I can do?

Answer: Yes. The President of the United States has just signed a bill referred to as the Child Status Protection Act. While a large part of the bill deals exclusively with persons who are going to ‘age-out’ or turn 21 years old, there is a very specific provision in the bill for people in your situation. It is specifically for persons who are the unmarried sons or daughters of a Lawful Permanent Resident parent. Once petitioned, the visa number availability falls under a certain preference category for Lawful Permanent Residents. That parent petitions them and at some later point naturalizes and becomes a U.S. Citizen. This now moves the petition into a different category where the wait for most of the rest of the world (other than the Philippines) is considerably shorter.

Question: What exactly does this bill do?

Answer: It gives you the right to write the Attorney General and tell him that you do not want the preference to automatically change. In other words, for people in your exact situation, you can make an election for the preference to stay exactly the same as if your mother was still a Lawful Permanent Resident

Question: What exactly does that do?

Answer: It means that you do not have to wait another 5 years to get your Green Card. Let’s pretend that your mother is still a Lawful Permanent Resident. If the priority date is current now, you can apply right now for Lawful Permanent Residency without waiting another 5 years. You will be able to be joined with your family years earlier.

Question: It seems as though this law just came out. My mother filed the petition for me many years ago. Can I still take benefit of this new law?

Answer: The answer is yes. The law allows you to take advantage of this law if the petition for your family preference was filed, but a visa has not yet been issued, or you have not yet adjusted your status. Also, the petition for the family preference can be pending as of now either with the Department of State or the Department of Justice. It is a very nice law for people especially from the Philippines. Therefore, anyone who has been waiting years for this petition to become current, only to learn that they must wait many more years after becoming a U.S. Citizen, should take advantage of this law right away. 

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/acquisition-of-u-s-citizenship/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/aquisition-of-citizenship/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/claim-to-us-citizenship/

https://californiaimmigration.us/citizenship/

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Title: The BIA. Just a stepping stone.

Posted on August 17, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I lost my case at the Immigration Court. I understand that I have many issues that I can appeal and that there is a very reasonable chance that I could win. Can you let me know where my appeal goes and what might happen?

Answer: There are many Immigration Courts in the U.S. All together there are about 55 Immigration Courts through all 50 States as well as in Puerto Rico. Whenever you lose at the Immigration Court level, you appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals or the BIA. There is only one BIA in the entire United States. The BIA is located in Virginia and handles all of the appeals of every Immigration Court throughout the entire United States.

The Notice of Appeal must be in the hands of the BIA no later than 30 days after issuance of the decision from the Immigration Judge. Afterwards, it goes to a panel of three of the members of the Board of Immigration Appeals and in about one year the decision is issued.

Question: I have heard that there will be some changes at the BIA. Is that true and what are they?

Answer: Yes it is true. The changes are not for the better. In fact, the changes will make the appeal process to the BIA an exercise in futility and will deny numerous rights to immigrants and their rights to appeal. Attorney General Ashcroft has just issued regulations to go into effect later this month that will change some of the basic ways that the BIA decides cases. First, they will no longer make a three member panel to decide cases, but only one member will decide. Only on cases of novel importance or ones that are unusually complicated will it be referred to a three member panel. Who decides if a case is novel or unusual is unclear. In all other real appeals (other than the new BIA regulations) it goes to a three member panel. This gives the person appealing the knowledge and satisfaction that the appeal will be decided among three qualified persons who must come to a consensus. Now, the appeal at the BIA, for the most part, is in the hands of one person. This item by itself takes away much of the due process and fairness to the immigrant.

Next, there is now a timetable that is set for deciding the case. Thus, rather than taking the necessary time to properly decide the case, the Attorney General has mandated that the cases take around 6 months. Thus, again there is a violation of the Due Process rights of immigrants. An appeal should not have as its primary importance the number of days or months it must be decided. What this will do is make a single member rush through cases to make sure that the timetable is met, rather than the case being decided on its merits.

Question: What will happen if the BIA denies the case?

Answer: In reality, that is what will happen in most cases. Because of these new regulations, and because of the violation of Constitutional Due Process rights, people will simply use the BIA as a stepping stone to get to the real appeal. Once the BIA denies the case, it can be appealed directly to a Circuit Appellate Court of the United States. These courts are right below the U.S. Supreme Court. In these appeals, there will be a three judge panel and they will give a real chance to have the case heard on the merits. Do not give up with these new regulations. Just keep fighting until you get to the Circuit Courts, and hopefully, we can restore the immigrant rights that have been lost.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/appeal-to-bia/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia-board-of-immigration-appeals/

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Title: Why am I penalized because my father became a U.S. Citizen?

Posted on August 14, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have seen your previous articles on the new Age-Out provisions of the law just recently passed. My father filed a petition for me around 1993. I am from the Philippines. He was a Lawful Permanent Resident at the time. Three years ago he became a U.S. Citizen. I was actually called for the interview at the U.S. embassy in the Philippines, but when they found out my father was a U.S. Citizen, they said my visa number was not current and made me leave. Can I still avail of this new law?

Answer: Yes. The President of the United States has just signed a bill referred to as the Child Status Protection Act. While a large part of the bill deals exclusively with persons who are going to ‘age-out’ or turn 21 years old, there is a very specific provision in the bill for people in your situation. It is specifically for persons who are the unmarried sons or daughters of a Lawful Permanent Resident parent. Once petitioned, the visa number availability falls under a certain preference category for Lawful Permanent Residents. That parent petitions them and at some later point naturalizes and becomes a U.S. Citizen. This now moves the petition into a different category where the wait for most of the rest of the world (other than the Philippines) is considerably shorter.

Question: What exactly does this bill do?

Answer: It gives you the right to write the Attorney General and tell him that you do not want the preference to automatically change. In other words, for people in your exact situation, you can make an election for the preference to stay exactly the same as if your mother was still a Lawful Permanent Resident

Question: What exactly does that do?

Answer: It means that you do not have to wait another 5 years to get your Green Card. Let’s pretend that your mother is still a Lawful Permanent Resident. If the priority date is current now, you can apply right now for Lawful Permanent Residency without waiting another 5 years. You will be able to be joined with your family years earlier.

Question: My friend is in the same situation, but she got into the U.S. and her kids did not. Can her children avail of this section?

Answer: Most probably not. Once there has either been a final Adjustment of Status or issuance of Lawful Permanent Residency, the law seems to indicate that derivative beneficiaries (i.e. the children) are no longer eligible. However, if it is still pending, then the law can be taken advantage of.

Question: It seems as though this law just came out. My mother filed the petition for me many years ago. Can I still take benefit of this new law?

Answer: The answer is yes. The law allows you to take advantage of this law if the petition for your family preference was filed, but a visa has not yet been issued, or you have not yet adjusted your status. Also, the petition for the family preference can be pending as of now either with the Department of State or the Department of Justice. It is a very nice law for people especially from the Philippines. Therefore, anyone who has been waiting years for this petition to become current, only to learn that they must wait many more years after becoming a U.S. Citizen, should take advantage of this law right away.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/citizenship/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/citizenship-question/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/acquisition-of-u-s-citizenship/

https://californiaimmigration.us/citizenship/

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Title: Have I or Have I not “Aged-Out”?

Posted on August 13, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I know that President Bush has signed into law the new Child Status Protection Act (CSPA) on August 6, 2002. However, I am very confused on whether this law applies to me. Can you clarify how I know if I have ‘aged-out’ under the new law?

Answer: First, there are sections that apply to Immediate Relatives. Generally, these would be spouses of U.S. Citizens, parents of U.S. Citizens over 21 years of age and sons/daughters of U.S. Citizens who are under 21 years of age and unmarried.

Thus, most of the child age-out provisions will apply to the last category. Here, if the beginning of the family petition is filed BEFORE the child turns 21, then no matter how long it takes, that child will be deemed to be a child for immigration purposes.

Question: What if my parent was a Lawful Permanent Resident when he filed for me and I was under 21 at the time, but now my parent has become a U.S. Citizen?

Answer: In this case, the date that your parent naturalizes will control. Therefore, if your parent naturalized and you were 20 years old, then you will be considered a ‘child’ who will not age-out for this act. Therefore, it would be critical if your parent has not yet naturalized, and you are under 21 years of age, that they immediately begin naturalization proceedings.

Question: What if my friend was married at 18 years of age and then got divorced at 20 years of age? Will he qualify?

Answer: Yes. If his U.S. Citizen parent has petitioned him, then he will automatically move to the preference which is set for single son and daughters of U.S. Citizen Parents.

Question: Is the law retroactive and how do I know if I fall under it?

Answer: It appears as though current interpretation is that if there was a final decision on the case, that it is not retroactive. However, if the case is still pending, it appears that it will fall of the provisions of this act. Please note that the interpretations by the Department of State seem also to indicate that if derivative beneficiaries have not had a final approval on the case, but that the main applicant has, that it still could fall under this act.

Therefore, anyone who has been waiting years for this petition to become current, only to learn that they must wait many more years after becoming a U.S. Citizen, should take advantage of this law right away. All of these interpretations are from the Department of State. They have specifically stated that they might be able to change those interpretations after interagency communications. Therefore, what is stated here might change as time goes on. It hopefully will change to allow even more people fall under the provisions of this particular law.

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Title: ESSENTIAL WORKERS HELP OUR ECONOMY Part II

Posted on August 12, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: What are Essential Workers?

Answer: “Essential Workers” are the unskilled and semi-skilled workers employed in all sectors of our economy. Essential workers include restaurant workers, retail clerks, construction trades people, manufacturing line workers, hotel service workers, food production workers, landscape workers, and health care aids. It includes a multitude of other types of professions. These individuals often work in the jobs that many Americans do not choose, but which are “essential” to keep our economy and our country growing.

Question: Are there not enough U.S. workers for these jobs?

Answer: The demographics say no. By 2010, total civilian employment is projected to be 167.8 million, but the total civilian labor force is expected to be 158 million, more than nine million more jobs than people.

New jobs will increase dramatically by 2010, boosting the demand for Essential Workers. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) projections indicate that the U.S. will create 22 million new jobs by 2010. During this period, the service-producing sector alone is expected to create over 12 million new positions. Along with this growth, 57% of all job openings will be for “Essential Worker positions” and will only require moderate or short term on the job training.

Unskilled and semi-skilled occupations have the highest projected growth rate. The Department of Labor ranked the top 30 occupations with the largest projected job growth from 2001-2010. Of the occupations listed, 16 require unskilled or semi skilled laborers.

The U.S. is not producing enough new workers. More than 60 million current employees will likely retire over the next 30 years. After 2011, the year in which the first of the Baby Boomers turns 65, their retirement rates will reach proportions so huge that, barring unforeseen increases in immigration and/or participation rates among the elderly, there will be a reduction in the total size of the nation’s workforce.

Employers are doing the “right” things. Essential Worker employers have led the way in welfare-to-work, school-to-work and other initiatives that have been successful in reducing welfare rolls and getting graduates jobs, but these efforts still are insufficient. Employers are raising wages, offering improved benefits, signing bonuses and relocation pay.

Question: Isn’t there already a visa category for essential workers that these employers can use?

Answer: Yes and No. The H-2B temporary visa program is useful only for employers who can establish that their need for foreign workers is temporary (seasonal, a one-time occurrence, or a peak load or intermittent need). If the employer’s need is year-round or does not fall into one of the definitions used by the Department of Labor or Immigration Service, the employer cannot use the H-2B classification to fill labor needs. A nonimmigrant visa category does not exist for employers who need workers for more than one year or for employers who have permanent or long-term jobs, for example in the health care, retail, hospitality and other industries. Even for employers with truly temporary needs, the H-2B category backlogged and fraught with bureaucratic red tape that makes it extremely time-consuming and difficult to use. The permanent immigrant category for non-professionals in occupations that require less than two years’ experience is virtually useless; only 5,000 visas are available annually, and the backlog of waiting cases is over ten years long. As a result, employers often are forced to send their work overseas, cut back, or close their doors.

Question: With concerns about national security, is now the time to look at a temporary worker program?

Answer: Yes. A temporary worker program would help control immigration by legalizing the flow of people seeking to enter and leave this country. It would help satisfy the U.S. demand for workers and provide a legal and safe mechanism for workers to enter and leave the U.S.

Question: What needs to be done to be able to increase the number of immigration workers for these types of petitions?

Answer: U.S.-Mexico should resume immigration talks. Just prior to the September 11th attacks, President Fox and President Bush had just begun discussing a migration plan for comprehensive immigration reform between the U.S. and Mexico. Now, a year later, it is time for “los dos amigos” to renew their commitments to one another and resume their discussions on immigration initiatives that will benefit both our countries such as: an earned legalization program; an expanded permanent visa program; an enhanced temporary visa program; border control cooperation and economic development in Mexican immigrant sending regions.

The immigration reform proposal mirrors the recommendations by a bi-national working group from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the Autonomous Technological Institute of Mexico (ITAM) that call for both countries to reach a “grand bargain” that included various legalization measures for undocumented Mexicans in the United States, expanding the legal work visas available to migrants, equalizing the treatment of Mexican citizens under NAFTA immigration provisions, cracking down on immigrant smugglers and preventing dangerous border crossings.

Congress needs to update our immigration laws and policies to reflect the needs of our economy. The United States needs a regulated, workable immigration system that allows foreign nationals to work here when there is evidence of a shortage of available U.S. workers, and that allows those individuals already here and working to obtain legal status. Our laws also should allow those individuals to obtain green cards immediately when there is a permanent job.

Essential Worker Immigration Coalition (EWIC). A coalition of employer associations from sectors of the economy that rely heavily on essential workers, including hospitality, retail, restaurants, construction, recreation, transportation and others (including AILA), has been formed in Washington to work toward a broad solution to the essential worker issue. The agenda of this coalition includes reforming the current temporary visa category (H-2B), creating a new and longer-term nonimmigrant visa for essential workers (similar to H-1B), increasing the available green cards for essential workers and providing for earned adjustment for essential workers already in the U.S.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/essential-workers/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/h1b-2/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/h1b/

https://californiaimmigration.us/cant-get-h-1b-try-o-1

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

« Previous Page — Next Page »

  • Brian D. Lerner

    Immigration Lawyer

  • Blog Stats

    • 299,992 Visitors

  • Categories

  • Recent Posts