• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Court Says Individuals with Reinstated Removal Orders and in Withholding-Only Proceedings Are Not Eligible for Bond

The Ninth Circuit held that reinstated removal orders are administratively final, and that the detention of noncitizens subject to reinstated removal orders is governed by INA §241(a), rather than by INA §236(a). Thus, the court found that the petitioner was not entitled to a bond hearing. The court noted that its decision creates a circuit split with the Second Circuit’s decision in Guerra v. Shanahan.

The Fifth Circuit reversed the district court, holding that a judge’s statement at a guilty plea proceeding that deportation is “likely” does not foreclose a noncitizen defendant’s ability to demonstrate prejudice as a result of counsel’s failure to provide Padilla-required advice about the immigration consequences of the plea.

Best deportation attorney

Find a deportation lawyer

Deportation

Winning a deportation

How to get back into the U.S. after a deportation

Best deportation lawyer

Deportation

Deportation meaning

Deportation order

Looking for a deportation lawyer?

Question: Attorney Lerner, I understand that you are a deportation attorney. Can you describe what qualifications you have to represent clients in deportation proceedings?

Answer: Regarding Immigration Law, in 2000, I passed a rigorous examination and extensive experience requirements by the State Bar of California, Board of Legal Specialization. My firm handles all types of deportation cases from all over the United States. It is critical that you get an expert attorney to represent you for the deportation and removal cases, not just somebody who happens to be local. At the deportation or removal hearing, depending on the case, as a deportation lawyer, I can apply for many forms of relief to try to win the deportation case against the client. Some of these forms of relieve include political asylum, withholding of removal, and convention against torture, registry, adjustment of status, cancellation of removal, termination for deferred action, prosecutorial discretion, administrative closure among others.

Question: So what does a deportation attorney do at the actual hearings?

Answer: At the deportation hearing, a deportation attorney will be able to perform and guide the client through the entire through the process, the master calendar hearing, the contested hearings, and the individual hearings. Keep in mind that the master hearing is very important as it determines in many instances the direction of the case and should not be taken lightly. The contested hearings are very important as well as they will determine whether or not the charges against you will be sustained and whether the charge of removability will be issued. Finally, the individual hearing is critically important as this is the trial on the particular matter. There will be witnesses, testimony, evidence and other matters which will comprise of the entire trial. After the trial, the Immigration Judge will make a decision upon which you will either win or have to appeal. In any case, it is crucially important to have a qualified deportation attorney who is an expert and has years of experience as a deportation lawyer.

Question: How many years of experience as a deportation lawyer do you have?

Answer: As a deportation attorney, I have nearly 20 years of experience. With each case, I am better able to handle and help the client who is either in detention or fighting the case while not being detained.

Question: How can you take deportation cases all over the United States?

Answer: Because Immigration Law is Federal Law, an experienced deportation lawyer who is admitted as an attorney, can practice anywhere in the United States. As for deportation hearings in other States, I travel all over the United States to help clients. Many times, other than the Individual Hearings, the Immigration Judge will allow telephonic hearings. Since deportation and removal cases are very complicated, the client absolutely does wants an immigration attorney who is an expert deportation lawyer. There is too much at stake to hire somebody because they are local or simply charging a lot less money.

USCIS

Best deportation lawyer

LA deportation Attorney

Deportation Lawyer near me

 

 

 

 

 

I can’t become a U.S. Citizen if I’m in Deportation Proceedings?

I can’t become a U.S. Citizen if I’m in Deportation Proceedings? – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/Rz9ME

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation-proceedings/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/best-deportation-lawyer/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/best-deportation-attorney/

https://californiaimmigration.us/removal/winning-a-deportation-proceeding-from-an-immigration-lawyer-and-deportation-attorney/

Deportation Hearings with the Order to Show Cause

Deportation Hearings with the Order to Show Cause issued prior to 1996 and Suspension of Deportation – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/n36bb

Best deportation Attorney

Immigration Lawyer near me

Deportation: is there anything to do?

Winning a deportation proceeding 

An Overview of a Deportation Case

An Overview of a Deportation Case – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/K9Hus

Best deportation Attorney

Deportation Lawyer near me

Deportation proceedings

Removal: winning a deportation 

The Deportation Process Explained

The Deportation Process Explained

Question: I am now in deportation proceedings. I have no idea what to do in this deportation process and am very afraid how to proceed. Answer: The deportation process is certainly one that is intimidating. The ICE officials are usually not pleasant and will many times try to have you sign documents that you should not sign. The deportation process is meant to try to get you to voluntary deport so that there is one less person in the system. Nobody is there to help you during the deportation process, and therefore, you must do what is necessary to get a qualified immigration attorney. The deportation process usually begins with you being taken from your house or work and put into immigration detention. At that point, I have many clients tell me that ICE officials will basically tell them there is no hope and that they should just sign the voluntary deportation papers so they can be deported. However, in many cases this hopelessness is not true and there are forms of relief that is available. Therefore, do not sign anything. The deportation process will then continue with a hearing in front of the Immigration Judge. Normally, the first hearing will be set around 5 to 10 days after you are placed into detention. While it is possible to get bond beforehand, it is not likely. Even if Immigration sets bond, it is usually many thousands of dollars higher than what the Immigration Judge might set.

Answer: The deportation process is full of hearings, arguments, submissions and confusion. ICE officers are not known for being kind and I have heard many stories of ICE officials lying to detainees. The deportation process is meant to try to get you to voluntary deport so that there is one less person in the system. Nobody is there to help you during the deportation process, and therefore, you must do what is necessary to get a qualified immigration attorney. The deportation process usually begins along with you being taken from your house or work and put into immigration detention. At that point, I have many clients tell me that ICE officials will basically tell them there is no hope and that they should just sign the voluntary deportation papers so they can be deported. However, in many cases this hopelessness is not true and there are forms of relief that is available. Be sure you are not coerced into signing anything. The deportation process will then continue with a hearing in front of the Immigration Judge. Normally, the earliest hearing will be set around 5 to 10 days after you are placed into detention. While it is possible to get bond beforehand, it is not likely. Even if Immigration sets bond, it is usually many thousands of dollars higher than what the Immigration Judge might set.

At the first hearing in the deportation process, you could request a Bond Redetermination Hearing. This is the hearing where evidence will be presented to see if you are statutorily eligible for bond, and when so, what amount should be set for that bond. If the bond is set, then the case will be continued and you will be given an opportunity to have a family member or friend post the bond and you will be released. Remember that if you appear at all your immigration hearings, that you will get your bond money back at the end of the process. However, if you skip a hearing or do not follow the necessary instructions, you will have just given Immigration the bond money without return.

The deportation process will then continue in a non-detained facility if you bonded out and will continue with what is recognized like a Master Calendar hearing. While this particular hearing does not last long in front with the Immigration Judge, it can be quite important. It is where you’ll plea to the allegations inside the Notice to Appear. This is the document that you are served with at the beginning from the deportation process. It may be the charging document as to why immigration believes that you are deportable. After the Master Calendar, in case you disputed any from the allegations, the deportation process are going to be set over for what is known being a Contested Hearing. This really is where evidence will be presented to dispute the allegation as well as the Immigration Judge will either agree or disagree with you. If the charge is sustained, the Immigration Judge will determine if there is really a proper ground for removability. If so, the next phase on the deportation process is for you to present evidence on what grounds of relief you may qualify for in Immigration Court. This could be Cancellation of Removal, Adjustment of Status, Asylum, Convention Against Torture, Registry and others.

Once you might have let the Immigration Judge know what relief you may qualify for, your case will be set over to file the essential applications. Afterwards, the deportation process will allow the next hearing which is known as a Merits Hearing. This really is where you will in fact have trial on the matter and bring witnesses and all of your testimony too as whatever other evidence you could have. At the end in the deportation process (at least at the Immigration Court level), the Immigration Judge will make a decision and let you know if the relief has been granted or denied.

Of course, this is a summary with the deportation process and you can find lots of other items involved. Nonetheless, this does give you an idea with the deportation process and what to expect. One thing is for sure. Be certain to get an Immigration Attorney who knows the deportation process!

Best deportation lawyer

Find a good deportation attorney

Deportation meaning

Winning a deportation proceeding from an Immigration Lawyer 

Grounds for Deportation under Crimes of Moral Turpitude

Grounds for Deportation

Grounds for Removal based upon Crimes of Moral Turpitude

For a myriad associated with reasons, individuals discover themselves in deportation and/or removal  proceedings. In these proceedings, Immigration tries to be able to deport a person via the United States. There are quite a few ways regarding winning a removal case. Numerous factors depend upon how long an individual happen to be here from the United States, your relatives relationships, and also no matter whether you actually have a past criminal history. It is without a doubt crucially important which people get legal representation as soon as quite possible to be able to avoid adverse consequences of saying something in Immigration Court that will will probably damage the outcome regarding the case.

There tend to be a lot of grounds for deportation and/or removal. This article deals with Crimes associated with Moral Turpitude. The term “moral turpitude” means an act associated with baseness, vileness, as well as depravity inside the private and social duties owing in order to one’s fellow man as well as society in general, contrary to accepted and customary rules, and is based mostly on depraved and also vicious motives on the part of the alien. If a crime falls under ‘crimes associated with moral turpitude’ there tend to be grounds for removal. The actual Immigration Laws may not define or even provide a definition regarding a criminal offense associated with moral turpitude. Hence, a Court associated with Appeals may defer in order to the long-established BIA definition of which it includes a criminal offense fully commited recklessly with a conscious disregard of a substantial and unjustifiable risk to be able to the life and safety associated with others and these provide grounds for deportation and/or removal. There are many grounds for deportation

Irrespective of whether a crime involves moral turpitude and whether there tend to be grounds for deportation is actually contingent on the inherent nature of the crime as defined, as opposed to situations surrounding the unique transgression. The essential question and then in determining whether a crime involves moral turpitude is without a doubt no matter if the proscribed act, as based on the law regarding the right jurisdiction in which usually the act was thoroughly, includes elements which usually necessarily demonstrate the baseness, vileness, and depravity regarding the perpetrator.In order to determine regardless of whether a criminal conviction amounts to be able to a criminal offense involving moral turpitude and no matter whether there are generally grounds for deportation, it is actually the statute that will defines the crime, in lieu of the act absolutely, which usually is going to be controlling. If moral turpitude necessarily inheres from the crime defined by the statute under that the conviction occurred, the conviction is going to be for a crime involving moral turpitude. Hence, it is actually from the intent of which moral turpitude inheres, and a criminal offense absolutely without contemplating death, without malice, and without intent, and ordinarily thoroughly while engaged in a lawful act, although absolutely through carelessness or maybe lack associated with caution or simply circumspectio. In case the crime, does not include an evil intent, it does not involve moral turpitud and truth be told there are usually no grounds associated with removal.

However, a criminal statute need not require “evil intent” for it to be able to possibly be considered a crime involving moral turpitude; rather, the statute need simply require an act of such debased and also depraved behavior which it violates accepted moral specifications and in that case, there are usually grounds for deportation/removal. Conversely, not every conviction centered on a criminal statute requiring “evil intent” is going to be for a crime involving moral turpitude. Where reckless conduct is going to be an element of a statute, a crime of assault may end up being, although is without a doubt not per se, a crime involving moral turpitude; however, where the offense is similar in order to an easy assault, it is going to be not a crime involving moral turpitude. Just in case the statute under which in turn the alien was convicted includes some offenses that involve moral turpitude and others that tend not to, might the Board regarding Immigration Appeals (BIA) look to be able to the record regarding conviction, which in turn includes the indictment, the plea, the verdict, plus the sentence, in order to determine the offense for which in turn the alien was convicted. Within the case associated with a lot of lesser crimes, the question regarding moral turpitude is going to be not contingent on the name associated with the crime, but rather by the nature associated with the crime as defined within the pertinent statute and alleged within the indictment. In determining irrespective of whether a criminal offense involves moral turpitude, neither the immigration authorities nor the courts may go beyond the record of conviction to be able to examine conditions under which in turn the crime was fully commited, though, rather, the determination have to end up being made Moral turpitude ought to be inherent within the charge for there in order to be grounds for removal and thus ought to possibly be evidenced by the record itself; the question then is without a doubt no matter if the inherent nature associated with the crime as defined by law and particularized in the indictment necessarily involves moral turpitude. In general, a crime in which fraud is actually an ingredient involves moral turpitud and there tend to be grounds for removal, and fraudulent intent may either end up being explicit within a statutory definition regarding the crime or perhaps implicit inside the nature associated with the crime.Similarly, sexual crimes are considered in order to involve crimes of moral turputed upon the basis of the statutory definition associated with the crime plus the record regarding conviction. The indictment, plea, verdict, and sentencing, although not extrinsic evidence, may be properly considered in determining regardless of whether a crime involves moral turpitude. In doing so, the court may look to the allegations of the indictment pertinent to be able to the crime to be able to which in turn a plea associated with guilty was entered to determine no matter if such allegations state a crime involving moral turpitude.

Although when by definition a crime does not necessarily involve moral turpitude, an alien cannot possibly be deported because inside the particular instances conduct was immoral, if a crime does necessarily involve moral turpitude and there tend to be no grounds for deportation. Where the underlying, substantive offense is actually a crime involving moral turpitude, conspiracy to commit such an offense is actually likewise a crime involving moral turpitude and this provides grounds for removal. .Conversely, conspiracy to be able to commit an offense is going to be not a crime involving moral turpitude where the substantive offense does not involve moral turpitude. Similarly, conviction under state law associated with being an accessory before the fact constitutes a conviction for a criminal offense involving moral turpitude where the substantive offense involves moral turpitude and there are grounds regarding deportation..

Certain crimes involving moral turpitude for purposes regarding removal include: bad checks, blackmail, forgery, burgary, bigamy, insets, rape, larceny, receiving solen property, perjury, derauding the authorities, murder, voluntary manslaughter, mayhem, assalt and battery, false statements made in a passport, carrying a concealed weopen, robbery, child beating, bribery, counterfeiting, smuggling liquor, interfering with a policeman, possession of child pornography, alien smuggling, spousal abuse, mondey laundering and others.

As a person can observe the grounds for removal under crimes regarding moral turpitude is actually quite extensive. However, if people obtain people are generally in deportation and/or removal proceedings and need assist, it is going to be quite possible to be able to get waivers for many regarding thes crimes.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/best-deportation-attorney/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/best-deportation-lawyer/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation/

https://californiaimmigration.us/removal/winning-a-deportation-proceeding-from-an-immigration-lawyer-and-deportation-attorney/

Can someone be deported from the US that does not have legal status?

Can someone be deported from the US that does not have legal status? – Yahoo! Answers http://ping.fm/XpPTV

Child – deportation

Best deportation lawyer

Deportation proceedings

Winning a deportation