Posted on December 22, 2011 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Posted on December 2, 2011 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Over dissent, the court found that where Petitioner unintentionally drove into Mexico without advance parole, he did not abandon his NACARA adjustment of status because 8 CFR §245.13(k)(1) applies only to “desired” departures.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: 8 CFR §245.13(k)(1), AOS, Atty.Brian D. Lerner, CA9, Immigration Lawyer, NACARA | Leave a comment »
Posted on December 1, 2011 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The court held that a conviction for residential burglary under Cal. Penal code §459 is a crime of violence under 18 USC §16(b) and is therefore a bar to withholding of removal as a particularly serious crime.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: 8 USC §16(b), Atty.Brian D. Lerner, CA Residential Bulgary, CA9, Cal. Penal code §459, Immigration Lawyer | Leave a comment »
Posted on November 10, 2011 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Though the registry statute, INA §249, does not specify a time period for good moral character, the court found that the IJ’s determination based on conduct stretching many years and leading up to the hearing was permissible.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: Atty.Brian D. Lerner, CA9, IJ, Immigration Lawyer, INA 249, registry statute, Time Limitation | Leave a comment »
Posted on November 10, 2011 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Though the registry statute, INA §249, does not specify a time period for good moral character, the court found that the IJ’s determination based on conduct stretching many years and leading up to the hearing was permissible.
Immigration office
Immigration services
Immigration attorney
Immigration Law Firm
Filed under: Immigration Law | Tagged: Atty.Brian D. Lerner, CA9, IJ, Immigration Lawyer, INA 249, registry statute, Time Limitation | Leave a comment »
Posted on November 10, 2011 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The court found that Petitioner’s 1992 parole as a Special Immigrant Juvenile under INA §245(h) qualified as an admission “in any status” for purposes of cancellation of removal under INA §240A(a).
Ca9
Derivative citizenship under former INA
INA definition
Our Immigration Law Firm
Filed under: CA9 | Tagged: Atty.Brian D. Lerner, CA9, Immigration Lawyer, INA 245, INA240A, SIJ Parole, Special Immigrant Juvenile | Leave a comment »
Brian D. Lerner Immigration Attorney & Deportation Lawyer Blog 