Posted on October 1, 2020 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Sustaining DHS’s appeal in part and remanding the record to the immigration judge, the BIA ruled that in assessing whether to admit expert witness testimony, an immigration judge should consider whether it is sufficiently relevant and reliable and, if it is admitted, how much weight it should receive and how probative and persuasive it is.
Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: Appeal, BIA, board of immigration appeals, DHS | Leave a comment »
Posted on September 3, 2020 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The BIA ruled that after an immigration judge has set a deadline for filing relief, the respondent’s opportunity to file the application may be deemed waived, prior to a scheduled hearing, if the deadline passes without submission of the application and no good cause for noncompliance has been shown. The BIA also ruled that, although the respondent was detained, appeared pro se, and used a Spanish interpreter at his video conference hearing, none of these factors, standing alone or taken together, constitute a denial of due process.
Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: BIA, deadline for filing, Immigration Court, waiver | Leave a comment »
Posted on August 12, 2020 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The court held that the BIA and the immigration judge had misstated the court’s precedent in three ways in determining that the harm the Honduran petitioner had suffered did not rise to the level of past persecution, including by requiring the petitioner to show severe physical harm.
Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: asylum, BIA, cats, third circuit | Leave a comment »
Posted on May 21, 2020 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The BIA ruled that the absence of a checked alien classification box on a Notice to Appear (NTA) does not, by itself, render an NTA fatally deficient; preclude an immigration judge from exercising jurisdiction over removal proceedings; or terminate proceedings under the Migrant Protection Protocols.
Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: BIA, board of immigration appeals, deficient nta, notice to appear, NTA | Leave a comment »
Posted on April 18, 2020 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
on this BIA case:
The Board of Immigration Appeals has issued a decision in Matter of J-J-G-, 27 I&N Dec. 808 (BIA 2020).
Headnotes:
(1) The exceptional and extremely unusual hardship for cancellation of removal is based on a cumulative consideration of all hardship factors, but to the extent that a claim is based on the health of a qualifying relative, an applicant needs to establish that the relative has a serious medical condition and, if he or she is accompanying the applicant to the country of removal, that adequate medical care for the claimed condition is not reasonably available in that country.
(2) The Immigration Judge properly determined that the respondent did not establish eligibility for cancellation of removal because he did not demonstrate that his qualifying relatives will experience hardship, including medical, economic, and emotional hardship, that rises to the level of exceptional and extremely unusual.
Read full decision at https:/
I don’t see how that changes anything
(1) The exceptional and extremely unusual hardship for cancellation of removal is based on a cumulative consideration of all hardship factors, but to the extent that a claim is based on the health of a qualifying relative, an applicant needs to establish that the relative has a serious medical condition and, if he or she is accompanying the applicant to the country of removal, that adequate medical care for the claimed condition is not reasonably available in that country.
(2) The Immigration Judge properly determined that the respondent did not establish eligibility for cancellation of removal because he did not demonstrate that his qualifying relatives will experience hardship, including medical, economic, and emotional hardship, that rises to the level of exceptional and extremely unusual.
Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: BIA, board of immigration appeals, cancellation for removal, Extreme Hardship, Immigration Court | Leave a comment »
Posted on April 18, 2020 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The BIA ruled that for determining the firm resettlement bar to asylum, a viable and available offer to apply for permanent residence in a country of refuge is not negated by an individual’s unwillingness to satisfy the terms of acceptance.
Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: BIA, board of immigration appeals, firm resettlement | Leave a comment »
Posted on February 20, 2020 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
In Matter of Rodriguez, the BIA ruled that if DHS returns an individual to Mexico to await an immigration hearing pursuant to the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) and provides sufficient notice of that hearing, an immigration judge should enter an in absentia order of removal if the individual fails to appear for the hearing. Visit our featured issue page for more information on the MPP and tent courts.
BIA
BIA meaning
Appeal to BIA
BIA deference given to particulary serious crime
Filed under: BIA | Tagged: #bia, appeal to bia, BIA, bia board of immigration appeals, BIA Pro Bono Project, Immigration, Motion to Reopen with the BIA, mpp, wait in mexico policy | Leave a comment »
Posted on September 10, 2019 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The San Francisco Chronicle reports that the Trump administration has promoted six judges to the BIA — all of whom have high rates of denying immigrants’ asylum claims. “The [BIA’s] primary function is to ensure rule of law and impartiality, yet the [DOJ] cherry-picked judges from the harshest jurisdictions with the lowest asylum grant rates in the nation
Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: asylum, BIA, low grant rates | 1 Comment »
Posted on September 10, 2019 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The BIA issued a decision clarifying the “substantial and probative evidence” standard of proof necessary to bar the approval of a visa petition based on marriage fraud under INA §204(c).
Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: 204(c), BIA, marriage fraud, substantial and probative | Leave a comment »
Posted on July 8, 2019 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The BIA found the respondent removable, holding that it is not necessary to show his intent in order to establish that he is deportable for making a false representation of U.S. citizenship, and also because a Form N‑550 does not confer citizenship status if it is acquired unlawfully.
Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: BIA, Citizenship, n-550 | Leave a comment »