Posted on February 27, 2012 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Posted on February 24, 2012 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Posted on February 24, 2012 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The court found the petitioner, who argued he had intended to claim nationality, not citizenship, when he checked a box marked “citizen or national” on a Form I-9, failed to meet his burden of proving he did not falsely claim citizenship.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: Atty.Brian D. Lerner, Citizen or National, Citizenship, Form, I-9, Immigration Attorney, Nationality | Leave a comment »
Posted on February 24, 2012 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The court found the petitioner, who argued he had intended to claim nationality, not citizenship, when he checked a box marked “citizen or national” on a Form I-9, failed to meet his burden of proving he did not falsely claim citizenship.
Form I-9
Form I-9 requirements
Form I-9 employment eligibility verification
Immigration lawyer in LA
Filed under: I-9 | Tagged: Atty.Brian D. Lerner, Citizen or National, Citizenship, Form, I-9, Immigration Attorney, Nationality | Leave a comment »
Posted on February 24, 2012 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Posted on February 24, 2012 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
AILA amicus brief filed in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on the meaning of “particular social group” for asylum purposes, arguing that the “social visibility” or “particularity” should not constitute part of the social group inquiry.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: Amicus Brief, Asylum Purposes, Atty.Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Attorney, Particular Social Group | Leave a comment »
Posted on February 24, 2012 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
AILA amicus brief filed in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on the meaning of “particular social group” for asylum purposes, arguing that the “social visibility” or “particularity” should not constitute part of the social group inquiry.
Asylum
Adjudication of asylum
Asylum meaning
How to apply for political asylum
Filed under: asylum | Tagged: Amicus Brief, asylee, asylum, asylum 2.0, Asylum Applicants, Asylum Application, asylum attorney, asylum officer, asylum petition, Asylum Purposes, Atty.Brian D. Lerner, bond hearing asylum hearing, california asylum attorney, central american asylum, fake asylum, false asylum application, frivolous asylum, frivolous asylum application, Immigration Attorney, long beach asylum attorney, los angeles asylum attorney, Particular Social Group, Political Asylum, Refugee and Asylee follow-to-Join cases, united states asylum attorney | Leave a comment »
Posted on February 23, 2012 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
USCIS statement on stakeholder questions about the adjudication of petitions that for purposes of the job creation requirement have utilized what has been commonly termed a “tenant-occupancy” methodology.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: Atty.Brian D. Lerner, EB-5, Immigration Attorney, Methodology, Occupancy, Tenant | 1 Comment »
Posted on February 23, 2012 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
USCIS statement on stakeholder questions about the adjudication of petitions that for purposes of the job creation requirement have utilized what has been commonly termed a “tenant-occupancy” methodology.
EB-5 attorney
The EB-5
EB-5 conference
Have money for a bussines? Get the EB-5 form
Filed under: EB-5 Investment Visa | Tagged: Atty.Brian D. Lerner, EB-5, eb-5 attorney, EB-5 Conference, EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program, EB-5 Investment, EB-5 Investment Visa, EB-5 Visa, Immigration Attorney, Methodology, Occupancy, Tenant, USCIS memorandum on the adjudication of EB-5 Regional Center | 1 Comment »
Posted on February 23, 2012 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The Court found that convictions for tax violations under 26 U.S.C. §§7206(1) & (2) qualify as aggravated felonies, holding that the convictions involved fraud and deceit, and that tax crimes are not excluded from INA § 101(a)(43)(M)(i).
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: Aggravated Felonies, Atty.Brian D. Lerner, Federal Tax Offenses, Immigration Attorney, Supreme Court | Leave a comment »
Brian D. Lerner Immigration Attorney & Deportation Lawyer Blog 