• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

The Supreme Court will heard oral argume

The Supreme Court will heard oral argument on December 10, 2013, in the Child Status Protection Act (CSPA) case, Mayorkas v. DeOsorio. The Court will consider whom Congress intended to benefit by INA §203(h)(3), a provision which allows beneficiaries of certain visa petitions to retain earlier priority dates after “aging-out” (turning 21) and losing child status. AILA and the American Immigration Council filed an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to interpret the CSPA broadly. http://ow.ly/rBq5q

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has approved the statutory maximum 10,000 petitions for U-1 nonimmigrant status (U visas) for fiscal year 2014. This marks the fifth straight year that USCIS has reached the statutory maximum since it began issuing U visas in 2008. http://ow.ly/rG3EM

USCIS announced that today, December 9,

USCIS announced that today, December 9, 2013, the Dallas District and Field Offices and the Oklahoma City Field Office are closed. The Baltimore District Office and associated Application Support Centers are open, but under a two-hour delayed arrival. http://ow.ly/rBpAJ

BALCA vacates supplemental prevailing wa

BALCA vacates supplemental prevailing wage determinations and increased wages imposed on the employer after approval of the Form 9142 temporary labor certification, http://ow.ly/rBoyc

BALCA vacates supplemental prevailing wa

BALCA vacates supplemental prevailing wage determinations (PWDs) and increased wages imposed on the employer after approval of the Form 9142 temporary labor certification, finding that DOL regulations do not require an employer to increase the wage it offers and pays H-2B workers after certification of the application. http://ow.ly/rBnYM

YouTube Video: http://youtu.be/3vb4fnvZ-

YouTube Video: http://youtu.be/3vb4fnvZ-gY

Learn about the Right to Counsel in Immigration Court Proceedings

www.californiaimmigration.us I was order

http://www.californiaimmigration.us

I was ordered deported and nobody told me I could have an attorney!

Question: I was just in immigration court and was ordered deported. I had no idea what was happening and was confused. I had no attorney and the immigration judge never informed me if I could get an attorney. What can I do?

Answer: In actuality, you have a right to have an attorney at your own expense. In fact, there was a case that just came out at the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) whereby the Immigration Judge did not inform the person in deportation proceedings that he has such a right. Thus, the Board of Immigration Appeals reversed the decision and sent it back down to the Immigration Court.

In any removal proceedings before an immigration judge and in any appeal proceedings before the Attorney General from any such removal proceedings, the person concerned shall have the privilege of being represented (at no expense to the Government) by such counsel, authorized to practice in such proceedings, as he shall choose.

This case at the Board of Immigration Appeals makes it critically clear of the importance of having an immigration attorney present with you at all times. The immigration attorney will protect you and do things in your best interest. The Immigration Judge and the Trial Attorney for the Government are not your friends. You’re just another number on their docket. If they can get you off their docket, then their jobs became easier. However, you have a right to have an attorney and to be told that you have that right. Your life can change for the worse if you are deported or do not apply for the proper relief, or do not properly present the evidence or do not make a record for appeal in case the Immigration Judge denies your case.

Question: I’m in Montana and you are in California. Do you know any immigration lawyers in my area of the United States?

Answer: Immigration Law is federal law, and therefore, it is not necessary to get an immigration attorney who might not be experienced only because he or she is local. My practice has clients all over the United States and can protect persons anywhere in immigration court proceedings. In fact, I do different telephonic hearings from all corners of the United States in order to help people in detention and in removal proceedings.

Question: What if I cannot pay for the attorney?

Answer: You can ask friends, try to work out payment plans with the attorney or a variety of other options. There are also pro bono or low cost immigration attorneys which should have been given to you via a packet of information at the beginning of the process. However, this is not just a breach of contract or money issue. It is your life and that of your family. You do not want an attorney who only gives you half attention, or is not an expert in immigration law. If there was ever a time to make certain you properly did what you had to do in order to protect yourself and have a reasonable chance of winning, it would be when you are in immigration court.

Do your best to get legal counsel and do not represent yourself. There is too much at stake.

Deportation and the Dreaded Notice to Ap

Deportation and the Dreaded Notice to Appear – YouTube http://ow.ly/rxYvY http://ow.ly/rxYyf

E-2 Investment Visa and how to come to t

E-2 Investment Visa and how to come to the U.S. and run your own business – YouTube http://ow.ly/rxufC

USCIS issued a notice to stakeholders di

USCIS issued a notice to stakeholders discussing various relief measures that may be available to Filipino nationals impacted by Typhoon Haiyan, including expedited processing for pending I-130s. The notice also states that federal agencies continue to assess whether a TPS designation is warranted.