• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

http://youtu.be/hBDLGtnJOSg H-1B’s are

http://youtu.be/hBDLGtnJOSg H-1B’s are almost here. Get Ready!

Attorney Brian D Lerner:

Attorney Brian D Lerner: How to get back to the U.S. after a deportation

Best deportation attorney

Deported from the U.S.

Get the best deportation lawyer to help you with your deportation case

How to win a deportation

Attorney Brian D Lerner: How to get back

Attorney Brian D Lerner: How to get back to the U.S. after a deportation – YouTube http://ow.ly/tTgVT

Writs of Habeas Corpus A writ of “Habeas

Writs of Habeas Corpus

A writ of “Habeas Corpus” is a legal procedure that protects prisoners from unlawful detention and holds the government accountable. Habeas Corpus is a significant law used to protect individual liberties and freedoms and protect individuals from abusive or arbitrary state action. Used strategically, Habeas Corpus can protect individuals from deportation in a number of different scenarios.

A Writ of Habeas Corpus May Be Used To Help individuals Fight Illegal Or Improper Deportations

Habeas Corpus review is available in certain circumstances to challenge wrongful deportations. Generally, Habeas Corpus can be used to determine whether: (1) the individual fighting the deportation is an alien; (2) the individual was ordered removed (deported); and (3) the individual is a lawful permanent resident (LPR), or was granted refugee or asylum status. In this type of review, Habeas Corpus requires the court to determine whether such order of removal was in fact issued, and whether it relates to the individual who filed the action. If you have been wrongfully removed for not being a lawful permanent resident, Habeas Corpus can be used to fight a deportation.

Habeas Corpus May Be Used To Challenge Or Vacate State and Federal Criminal Convictions

In certain situations, Habeas Corpus may also be used to vacate or reduce criminal convictions that have taken away an individual’s residency. Where successful, a vacation or reduction of a conviction will allow individuals with past criminal histories to stay in the country. These individuals will no longer be considered deportable or removable, and/or designated as “aggravated felons.” In many jurisdictions where state Habeas Corpus actions have failed, it may be possible to bring a federal Habeas Corpus action to vacate a state crime, and retain your residency.

It is important to note that recent law (AEDPA §§101-06) has imposed a one-year statute of limitations on using Habeas http://ow.ly/tSzHg

http://youtu.be/1uMGFV9KNaw How to Inves

http://youtu.be/1uMGFV9KNaw How to Invest the $500,000 in a Regional Center for best EB-5 Petitions

http://ow.ly/tclzc EB-5’s from China ma

http://ow.ly/tclzc EB-5’s from China may enter the possibility of retrogression this coming summer or early fall.

http://ow.ly/tcllC The use of prosecutor

http://ow.ly/tcllC The use of prosecutorial discretion is on the rise in Los Angeles and in some other immigration courts.

Medical condition can be basis for asylum

Medical condition can be basis for asylum. The Fourth Circuit vacated and remanded, finding that the petitioner, who suffered severe harm in hospitals and prisons in Tanzania, qualified for asylum based on his membership in the particular social group of individuals with bipolar disorder who exhibit erratic behavior.

Adjudication of asylum

Apply for asylum

Appeal asylum

Don´t even think about filing a frivolous asylum application

http://ow.ly/tckZG Medical condition can

http://ow.ly/tckZG Medical condition can be basis for asylum. The Fourth Circuit vacated and remanded, finding that the petitioner, who suffered severe harm in hospitals and prisons in Tanzania, qualified for asylum based on his membership in the particular social group of individuals with bipolar disorder who exhibit erratic behavior.

http://ow.ly/tckQk News on detainee righ

http://ow.ly/tckQk News on detainee rights from ICE. Under a proposed settlement of a class-action lawsuit, ICE agreed to avoid shackling detainees at the San Francisco, CA immigration court at bond or merits hearings unless they pose a safety threat or risk of escape.