http://ow.ly/wxDtF A new CBP website now allows nonimmigrant travelers to access arrival and departure records going back five years from the request date. CBP states that this website may eliminate the need for travelers to file FOIA requests for this information.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Leave a comment »
http://youtu.be/rSIVf4CZee0
Got a crime? You might not be inadmissible.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | 4 Comments »
http://ow.ly/wp9om Recent Win for Brian D. Lerner:
Board granted sua sponte motion to reopen 2006 order based on changed country conditions in Egypt and eligibility for adjustment of status. Client was previously found not credible and his case, with a different office, went all the way up to the 9th Circuit.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Leave a comment »
http://ow.ly/wg5BO The New York Times reports that last week, after a U.S. magistrate judge in Portland, Oregon ruled that an immigrant’s rights had been violated when she was held in a county jail based on a federal immigration detainer, sheriffs in nine Oregon counties announced that they would no longer hold people in jail based on detainers.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Leave a comment »
http://youtu.be/C4EH5QxJj7o Learn how to fight against the permanent bar.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Leave a comment »
http://ow.ly/w7SPq The Fifth Circuit denied the petition for review, finding that INA §245(i) does not overcome inadmissibility under INA §212(a)(6)(C)(i) for fraudulent entry.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Leave a comment »
http://ow.ly/w7Stp On April 28, 2014, USCIS will begin premium processing for H-1B petitions subject to the FY2015 cap, including H-1B petitions for individuals who have earned a U.S. master’s degree or higher.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Leave a comment »
http://ow.ly/w7BOe The Eleventh Circuit found the petitioners did not show that the IJ and BIA erred in giving little or no weight to an unauthenticated 2006 “official document” from the Birth Control Office when denying the forced sterilization asylum case.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Leave a comment »
http://ow.ly/w5Rsw Is Due Process going down?
DHS’s increased use of the expedited removal process, in which the deportee never sees a judge, but the removal remains on his or her permanent record.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Leave a comment »
http://ow.ly/vROzx The Fourth Circuit gave deference to the BIA decision in Camarillo and found that service of the notice to appear (NTA) terminated physical presence by triggering the stop-time rule, notwithstanding the fact that the NTA was missing the hearing date and time and contained incorrect charges that were later amended.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Leave a comment »
Immigration Lawyer
Brian D. Lerner Immigration Attorney & Deportation Lawyer Blog 