How do I find details of a deportation notice – Immigration – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/9ZSBA
Filed under: Deportation, deportation attorney, Immigration Attorney, los angeles deportation attorney, USCIS | Tagged: Deportation Notice, Immigration Attorney | Leave a comment »
Question: I have been out of status for a number of years. Currently, I have a couple different petitions going forward. Once is a sibling based family petition, and the other is an employment based Labor Certification. I was told that it would take about another three to four years to be able to adjust my status to that of a Lawful Permanent Resident. There have been many news stories of people begin picked up by INS and deported, I am afraid for myself, my wife and my children. Can I just be deported?
Answer: Under most circumstances, the answer is no. Because you are here in the United States, you are allowed the opportunity to go in front of an Immigration Judge. Only if you had a previous deportation order can INS just take you and deport you without giving you a hearing. It is your constitutional right. Unlike many other countries around the world, even if you are not a citizen or a lawful permanent resident of the United States, you are entitled to due process. This means that you have an opportunity to present your case, to question witnesses, to cross examine witnesses who testify against you, to apply for relief or ways of staying permanently in the United States and to appeal decisions of the Immigration Judge that you are not satisfied with.
Question: What exactly might happen?
Answer: Each case is different. However, if you are targeted by INS, you should be served with what is known as a Notice to Appear. This is the beginning of the process. You might be taken into custody upon which you would be able to try to get a Bond Redetermination Hearing to get bonded out or become free while the immigration case is going forward. Then, over the next six months to two years, you will present your case in front of the Immigration Judge with the hope of winning.
Question: Am I entitled to an attorney?
Answer: Yes. You have every right to have an attorney represent you through these proceedings. However, unlike criminal cases, you must pay for the attorney to help you. The State will not provide one free of charge.
Question: How can the U.S. Constitution protect someone in my position?
Answer: Because the U.S. Constitution gives people their rights as free persons in this country. If the U.S. Government were to just pick someone up and deport them, there would not be any safeguards against possible mistakes they may make. Also, the law allows people who are out of status to obtain their Green Cards based upon certain criteria. The government allows you to present that evidence. Just remember that this is the best country in the world to live in (no offense to those people elsewhere) and one reason it is such a great place to live is because individual rights are valued and treasured by our Constitution.
However, the United States Government seems to be taking various rights away from certain immigrants. Therefore, you will have to make certain that you contact an immigration attorney right away in order to protect your rights and not be wrongfully deported.
Filed under: Deportation, Immigration Law, immigration provisions, Labor Certification, USCIS | Tagged: Deportation, Labor Certification | Leave a comment »
Question: I have been out of status for a number of years. Currently, I have a couple different petitions going forward. Once is a sibling based family petition, and the other is an employment based Labor Certification. I was told that it would take about another three to four years to be able to adjust my status to that of a Lawful Permanent Resident. There have been many news stories of people begin picked up by INS and deported, I am afraid for myself, my wife and my children. Can I just be deported?
Answer: Under most circumstances, the answer is no. Because you are here in the United States, you are allowed the opportunity to go in front of an Immigration Judge. Only if you had a previous deportation order can INS just take you and deport you without giving you a hearing. It is your constitutional right. Unlike many other countries around the world, even if you are not a citizen or a lawful permanent resident of the United States, you are entitled to due process. This means that you have an opportunity to present your case, to question witnesses, to cross examine witnesses who testify against you, to apply for relief or ways of staying permanently in the United States and to appeal decisions of the Immigration Judge that you are not satisfied with.
Question: What exactly might happen?
Answer: Each case is different. However, if you are targeted by INS, you should be served with what is known as a Notice to Appear. This is the beginning of the process. You might be taken into custody upon which you would be able to try to get a Bond Redetermination Hearing to get bonded out or become free while the immigration case is going forward. Then, over the next six months to two years, you will present your case in front of the Immigration Judge with the hope of winning.
Question: Am I entitled to an attorney?
Answer: Yes. You have every right to have an attorney represent you through these proceedings. However, unlike criminal cases, you must pay for the attorney to help you. The State will not provide one free of charge.
Question: How can the U.S. Constitution protect someone in my position?
Answer: Because the U.S. Constitution gives people their rights as free persons in this country. If the U.S. Government were to just pick someone up and deport them, there would not be any safeguards against possible mistakes they may make. Also, the law allows people who are out of status to obtain their Green Cards based upon certain criteria. The government allows you to present that evidence. Just remember that this is the best country in the world to live in (no offense to those people elsewhere) and one reason it is such a great place to live is because individual rights are valued and treasured by our Constitution.
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/best-deportation-attorney/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation-attorney/
https://californiaimmigration.us/our-immigration-law-firm/
Filed under: Deportation | Tagged: Deportation, deportation attorney, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer | 1 Comment »
Question: I became a Lawful Permanent Resident several years ago, and am very grateful. However, there are several persons that I know that are not so lucky. They are still fighting to obtain legal residency in the U.S. Some are in deportation proceedings. Some are hiding in the shadows of America. Some are fearing everywhere they go. Are there any new leaders in Congress and should we give thanks of an elusive freedom that is so difficult to obtain?
Answer: Recently, the President of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) wrote on this subject. I think it best to simply quote him. He states:
‘From the moment that terrorists attacked the United States last September, AILA has consistently supported measures legitimately required to guarantee our national security without eroding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.
AILA gratefully recognized President George W. Bush’s leadership when he reminded the nation that neither the Arabic community in the United States, nor the members of the Islamic faith throughout the world, are in any way responsible for the terrorist acts of criminals. And AILA called on leaders from both sides of the aisle to put the national interest above partisan considerations.
Midterm Congressional elections are eminent, and the siren song of perceived political advantage has started to separate the opportunists from the statesmen. Events of the last few days have, as they say, given opportunism a bad name.
On June 20, the Dallas Morning Herald quoted Representative George Gekas, Chair of the House Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims (noting Census Bureau estimates that the undocumented population tops 8 million), as saying: “There are thousands among those millions, perhaps millions among those millions, who have exactly that kind of mind set . . . to become terrorists.”
Term limits resulted in Lamar Smith relinquishing the Immigration Subcommittee Chair in 2000. While never an immigration advocate, George Gekas, it was said, was no Lamar Smith. Could he possibly believe that there are millions of terrorists lurking among us? Had the Chair misspoken or had he unearthed an opportunist’s play book and thus signaled a sea change? Perhaps significantly, Mr. Gekas retained Smith’s subcommittee staff. And, to Mr. Gekas’s evident surprise, reapportionment has made his District more competitive, thus resulting in a serious challenge; he now must fight to win an 11th term.
Our answer came soon enough. On June 26, 2002, Mr. Gekas introduced the “Securing America’s Future through Enforcement Reform (SAFER) Act” (H.R. 5013).
SAFER is a cynical amalgam. It is over 200 pages long, but much of it can be categorized as: (1) piling on (in increasing penalties for offenses that may already be substantial); (2) redundant; and (3) grandstanding (taking credit for proposals that may eventually be enacted in other legislation). To be sure, SAFER contains some novel twists that are more than a little offensive and more than a little dangerous. (Mr. Gekas’s summary of SAFER was posted on the News Flash section of InfoNet and will remain available as Doc. No. 02062731; the text of the full bill will be posted as soon as it becomes available.) Legislatively, SAFER is irresponsible, but as its sponsors well know, it is also DOA. However, that is not the point. The point is that the political calculations were made and Representative Gekas cast his lot; he has bought FAIR’s agenda of Fear and Loathing wholesale.
This week we celebrate our independence. The first July 4th after September 11, 2001 promises to be especially poignant. It is a particularly appropriate time to rejoice in America’s liberty and diversity and to remember the sacrifices of our people, who for four centuries, have come to these shores from every corner of the world to cultivate, nurture and defend our freedom and way of life. America is immigrants and the children of immigrants. This year a second day is just as important as July 4th to validate and affirm our nation’s freedom: our election day, Tuesday, November 5.
I trust that on this July 4th we will hear and think a lot about fundamental American values. Between now and November 5 we must redouble our efforts to preserve these values. No one is better equipped to rebut anti-immigrant rhetoric than AILA attorneys. Don’t let mindless or hateful rhetoric go unchallenged. Write Opinion pieces and Letters to the Editor and be proactive in encouraging your clients to do the same. Go back to the basics–actively support candidates who have the courage to stand up for fundamental American values, immigrant rights and the rule of law. Encourage each of your eligible clients to naturalize, to register, and to vote. (A brochure, in both English and Spanish, with state-by-state voter registration information can be found on the InfoNet–go to “Advocacy Center,” then click on “Take Action” followed by “Vote Drive”). And oppose the politicians who have cynically chosen to use this moment of national crisis to undermine our heritage as a nation of immigrants, who would curtail the fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution. Write a check, support our friends and be sure that our foes pay the price. The tools you need are at your fingertips, through InfoNet.
The late North Carolina Congressman Richardson Preyer would began a campaign by telling the troops “It’s bumper sticker, door bell ringing time again.” So it is. Let us begin.’
Let us never take for granted the freedoms which we enjoy. There are people in our very backyard who will attempt to limit those freedoms and take them away from us.
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation-attorney/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation-proceedings/
Filed under: Deportation | Tagged: deportable, Deportation, deportation attorney, deportation lawyer, deportation order, deportation proceedings, deportations, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, Terrorism | Leave a comment »
Question: I have been here in the U.S. since I was six years old. About 12 years ago, I committed a drug crime of possession for sale. I was sentenced to 4 months. Now, all these years later, I have been put into removal proceedings where INS is trying to deport me. I have been told that I am an aggravated felon and there is nothing I can do. I have further been told that I will most likely be deported away from my family including my U.S. Citizen spouse and three U.S. Citizen Children. I have never done anything else criminally and it was just a stupid mistake when I was young. I have changed, have a good job, a family with U.S. Citizens and many community ties. Is there anything I can do?
Answer: As the law stands now, there is very little you can do. This is a result of the 1996 laws which increased dramatically the laws on what was considered to be an aggravated felony. It has torn families apart for many years since 1996. People who have become long term residents in the U.S. and have their Green Cards found out it did not make any difference. They were still deported. Furthermore, they found out that they were barred from coming back into the U.S. for the rest of their lives. Congress has seen all the suffering caused by the unfair and anti-immigration laws of 1996 and just this week the House Judiciary Committee passed the 2002 Due Process Reform Bill. While it still must be passed by the Senate and signed by the President, it is an excellent step in giving back some of the due process rights lost by long term residents who were put in deportation proceedings because of various crimes.
Question: How does this particular bill help me?
Answer: Please note that the Senate might change some of the provisions, or the President might require some alternate items in the bill. However, as the bill stands now, it applies specifically to people who previously had their Green Cards. They were or are going to be placed into deportation or removal proceedings because of a crime they committed. They are considered to be an aggravated felons and do not qualify for the normal Cancellation of Removal.
Question: What is Cancellation of Removal?
Answer: Prior to this bill there was a section of the bill referred to as Cancellation of Removal for Certain Lawful Permanent Residents. Generally, you had to have your Green Card for at least five-years and be physically present in the U.S. for at least seven-years. Finally, and this is the item that disqualified numerous people, is that you cannot be convicted of an aggravated felony.
Question: What does the new bill allow?
Answer: Basically it deals with the Cancellation of Removal for people who have committed aggravated felonies. In the new bill, it expands the Cancellation of Removal so that it allows people whom have been convicted of aggravated felonies to still keep their Green Cards and stay in the U.S. It deals with three different scenarios. First, people who have been convicted of a non violent aggravated felony. Second, people who were convicted of a violent aggravated felony. Finally, people who have been convicted of an aggravated felony and came to the U.S. as a young child. Each of these provisions allows a person to remain in the U.S. and to not be deported if the Judge grants the Cancellation of Removal. Therefore, this is a very big step toward restoring some of the harsh anti-immigrant provisions of the 1996 law. Hopefully, this trend will continue so that families can be reunited and the tearing apart of immigrant families will stop. .
Filed under: Deportation | Tagged: Deportation, deportation attorney, deportation lawyer, deportation order, deportation proceedings, deportations, Drug Trafficking Crimes, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, Removal Proceedings | 2 Comments »
Question: I have been here in the U.S. since I was six years old. About 12 years ago, I committed a drug crime of possession for sale. I was sentenced to 4 months. Now, all these years later, I have been put into removal proceedings where INS is trying to deport me. I have been told that I am an aggravated felon and there is nothing I can do. I have further been told that I will most likely be deported away from my family including my U.S. Citizen spouse and three U.S. Citizen Children. I have never done anything else criminally and it was just a stupid mistake when I was young. I have changed, have a good job, a family with U.S. Citizens and many community ties. Is there anything I can do?
Answer: As the law stands now, there is very little you can do. This is a result of the 1996 laws which increased dramatically the laws on what was considered to be an aggravated felony. It has torn families apart for many years since 1996. People who have become long term residents in the U.S. and have their Green Cards found out it did not make any difference. They were still deported. Furthermore, they found out that they were barred from coming back into the U.S. for the rest of their lives. Congress has seen all the suffering caused by the unfair and anti-immigration laws of 1996 and just this week the House Judiciary Committee passed the 2002 Due Process Reform Bill. While it still must be passed by the Senate and signed by the President, it is an excellent step in giving back some of the due process rights lost by long term residents who were put in deportation proceedings because of various crimes.
Question: How does this particular bill help me?
Answer: Please note that the Senate might change some of the provisions, or the President might require some alternate items in the bill. However, as the bill stands now, it applies specifically to people who previously had their Green Cards. They were or are going to be placed into deportation or removal proceedings because of a crime they committed. They are considered to be an aggravated felons and do not qualify for the normal Cancellation of Removal.
Question: What is Cancellation of Removal?
Answer: Prior to this bill there was a section of the bill referred to as Cancellation of Removal for Certain Lawful Permanent Residents. Generally, you had to have your Green Card for at least five-years and be physically present in the U.S. for at least seven-years. Finally, and this is the item that disqualified numerous people, is that you cannot be convicted of an aggravated felony.
Question: What does the new bill allow?
Answer: Basically it deals with the Cancellation of Removal for people who have committed aggravated felonies. In the new bill, it expands the Cancellation of Removal so that it allows people whom have been convicted of aggravated felonies to still keep their Green Cards and stay in the U.S. It deals with three different scenarios. First, people who have been convicted of a non violent aggravated felony. Second, people who were convicted of a violent aggravated felony. Finally, people who have been convicted of an aggravated felony and came to the U.S. as a young child. Each of these provisions allows a person to remain in the U.S. and to not be deported if the Judge grants the Cancellation of Removal. Therefore, this is a very big step toward restoring some of the harsh anti-immigrant provisions of the 1996 law. Hopefully, this trend will continue so that families can be reunited and the tearing apart of immigrant families will stop. .
Filed under: Deportation, Immigration Law, immigration provisions, Removal Proceedings, USCIS | Tagged: Drug Trafficking Crimes, Removal Proceedings | 2 Comments »
Question: I have been in the United States for 13 years and have worked illegally the entire time. My boss just came to me last week and said the Social Security Department has sent him notification that there is something wrong with my Social Security Number and that he must terminate my position. Two days later I got a letter from the Immigration and Naturalization Service that I am in deportation proceedings. Do I have any hope?
Answer: First, the Social Security Department has been getting much stricter on notifying employers when a Social Security Card does not match the employees information. Previously, they had done this only when there was an employer with a large amount of employees who had incorrect information (e.g., fake social security cards.) However, in the current world we live in, they are now sending employers the request for confirmation of the Social Security Card if a single employee’s information does not match. Under the immigration laws, they are then forbidden to keep the employee hired without violating the law.
Unfortunately, you are now in Removal Proceedings and the INS will try to have you deported. Fortunately, the United States has several options for people in Removal (or deportation) Proceedings even if they have worked out of status and are here in the United States illegally. There is what is known as Cancellation of Removal. In order to qualify for this type of relief, you need several things. First, you must have been physically present in the United States for at least ten years. Secondly, you must have good moral character. Finally, you must have an immediate Lawful Permanent Resident Relative or United States Citizen who will suffer extreme hardship if you are deported or removed from the United States.
Question: I do have two United States Citizen Children. However, how would I possibly show or prove that they would suffer extreme hardship if I were deported?
Answer: You have actually hit on the most difficult part of a Cancellation of Removal case. It is showing the extreme hardship. Previously, if you had children that were of at least five or six years old, it was not difficult to prove this issue. Then the Board of Immigration Appeals came out with a case that basically made it incredibly difficult to meet the extreme hardship burden. Recently, the Board of Immigration Appeals has seemed to back off of such a stringent interpretation of the issue of showing extreme hardship. It is known as the Recinas case and was decided less than one month ago. In fact, the exact terminology that you must consider is ‘exceptional and extremely unusual’ hardship. Therefore, the hardship associated with a normal deportation will not suffice. However, under Recinas, you do not need to show that the hardship would be unconscionable. In deciding a Cancellation of Removal claim, consideration and evidence should be given to the age, health and circumstances of the family members. Some of the factors would include how a lower standard of living or adverse country conditions in the country of return might affect those relatives.
Question: What type of factors should I present to show the hardship?
Answer: In addition to the above, try to show all U.S. Citizen family members who interact with your children (such as a Grandmother or Grandfather.) Present evidence on how little knowledge they have of their home country, or how they may not know the language and culture of the home country. Present evidence showing financial, emotional and medical hardships. Also, show that there are no other realistic means for you to ever immigrate to the U.S. again. Basically, it is not easy to obtain Cancellation of Removal, but if all the evidence is presented and all of the different factors are taken into account regarding the hardship, there is a chance you will be granted your Lawful Permanent Residence based upon Cancellation of Removal.
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation-proceedings/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/best-deportation-attorney/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation/
Filed under: Deportation | Tagged: Deportation, deportation attorney, deportation lawyer, deportation proceedings, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, Removal Proceedings | Leave a comment »
Question: I have been in the United States for 13 years and have worked illegally the entire time. My boss just came to me last week and said the Social Security Department has sent him notification that there is something wrong with my Social Security Number and that he must terminate my position. Two days later I got a letter from the Immigration and Naturalization Service that I am in deportation proceedings. Do I have any hope?
Answer: First, the Social Security Department has been getting much stricter on notifying employers when a Social Security Card does not match the employees information. Previously, they had done this only when there was an employer with a large amount of employees who had incorrect information (e.g., fake social security cards.) However, in the current world we live in, they are now sending employers the request for confirmation of the Social Security Card if a single employee’s information does not match. Under the immigration laws, they are then forbidden to keep the employee hired without violating the law.
Unfortunately, you are now in Removal Proceedings and the INS will try to have you deported. Fortunately, the United States has several options for people in Removal (or deportation) Proceedings even if they have worked out of status and are here in the United States illegally. There is what is known as Cancellation of Removal. In order to qualify for this type of relief, you need several things. First, you must have been physically present in the United States for at least ten years. Secondly, you must have good moral character. Finally, you must have an immediate Lawful Permanent Resident Relative or United States Citizen who will suffer extreme hardship if you are deported or removed from the United States.
Question: I do have two United States Citizen Children. However, how would I possibly show or prove that they would suffer extreme hardship if I were deported?
Answer: You have actually hit on the most difficult part of a Cancellation of Removal case. It is showing the extreme hardship. Previously, if you had children that were of at least five or six years old, it was not difficult to prove this issue. Then the Board of Immigration Appeals came out with a case that basically made it incredibly difficult to meet the extreme hardship burden. Recently, the Board of Immigration Appeals has seemed to back off of such a stringent interpretation of the issue of showing extreme hardship. It is known as the Recinas case and was decided less than one month ago. In fact, the exact terminology that you must consider is ‘exceptional and extremely unusual’ hardship. Therefore, the hardship associated with a normal deportation will not suffice. However, under Recinas, you do not need to show that the hardship would be unconscionable. In deciding a Cancellation of Removal claim, consideration and evidence should be given to the age, health and circumstances of the family members. Some of the factors would include how a lower standard of living or adverse country conditions in the country of return might affect those relatives.
Question: What type of factors should I present to show the hardship?
Answer: In addition to the above, try to show all U.S. Citizen family members who interact with your children (such as a Grandmother or Grandfather.) Present evidence on how little knowledge they have of their home country, or how they may not know the language and culture of the home country. Present evidence showing financial, emotional and medical hardships. Also, show that there are no other realistic means for you to ever immigrate to the U.S. again. Basically, it is not easy to obtain Cancellation of Removal, but if all the evidence is presented and all of the different factors are taken into account regarding the hardship, there is a chance you will be granted your Lawful Permanent Residence based upon Cancellation of Removal.
Filed under: Deportation, Immigration Law, immigration provisions, Removal Proceedings, USCIS | Tagged: Deportation, Removal Proceedings | Leave a comment »
Question: I have been in the United States for many years. I think there were several things I could have done in the past to help my situation, but did not know exactly what to do. Unfortunately, I let the opportunities pass because I was afraid to see a lawyer. To be honest, I was afraid they would turn me in to INS. Can you tell me what I can do?
Answer: First, you should not be afraid to see a lawyer. Lawyer’s have what is known as the Attorney-Client Privilege. This means that whatever you say to a lawyer cannot be discussed with anyone. If it is, then there is a very serious violation of the Professional Ethics of Responsibility.
Question: What is the reason for the Attorney-Client Privilege?
Answer: Actually, it is meant to protect people in your exact situation. People must not be afraid to see a lawyer to help them. If they thought that the lawyer would either tell someone, or turn them into INS, people would either not come for help, or would not tell the whole story. Naturally, if they did not tell the whole story, the lawyer could not fully represent them.
I have had clients in the past who did not tell me they had prior deportation orders. When the time came to submit everything, these people could have easily been detained and deported. Luckily, I found out the truth. However, had I not found out the truth, there cases would have been severely compromised.
Question: What happens if I get laid off or have a disagreement with my attorney? Can he or she then turn me in to INS?
Answer: No, the attorney-client privilege stays in tact forever. This means that years after the case is over, the attorney can still not disclose the facts of the case. Immigration is a very unique area of law. This is because many times people are afraid of being deported and assume that an attorney is an American who would either be working on behalf of the government or under an obligation to inform the government. While in some countries that may be true, it is not true in the U.S. An attorney is a person who wants to represent you to help you with your immigration problem. You need not be afraid to go into the office of an attorney. There are many constraints on what an attorney can and cannot do. All of these restraints are made to protect the public. Many times you are afraid and alone. Do not let another opportunity pass to obtain legal status because you think the attorney will call INS. You will only be hurting yourself in the future. In most cases, by helping yourself, you will also help your family. If you want to make absolutely certain that it will not be disclosed, make certain the attorney you are seeing is a licensed attorney. Only after you see an attorney and fully discuss every detail of your case can you get full and complete representation.
Filed under: Deportation, Detention, Immigration Law, immigration provisions, USCIS | Tagged: Deportation, Detention | 1 Comment »
Question: I am writing from the immigration detention facility. I have had my Green Card for many years, but committed a crime many years ago. After trying to become a U.S. Citizen, they not only denied my application, but put me in detention and deportation. I have heard that there is no way I can be bonded out during the proceedings. Is this true?
Answer: Partially. The United States Supreme Court recently decided a case known as the Kim case. The Court held that the government may detain classes of lawful permanent residents without conducting individualized bond hearings to determine whether they pose a flight risk or danger to the community. The INA lists broad categories of noncitizens that are subject to mandatory detention based on their removability under specific criminal provisions.
After the Court announced its decision, the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (BICE) issued a memorandum saying that all persons subject to Kim would receive letters within six months asking them to report for an interview. BICE said it would re-detain individuals who had previously been released after a bond hearing, but who now fall within the mandatory detention provisions.
Question: Is there anyway around the Kim case?
Answer: There may be. The first step in analyzing any mandatory detention case is to determine whether the Kim case even applies. Only individuals who were released from criminal custody after October 8, 1998 are subject to mandatory detention. Thus, if you were released from custody before that time, you are not subject to the mandatory detention.
Also, it can be argued that only individuals who are taken into custody immediately upon their release from criminal incarceration fall within the confines of this case.
Assuming this cannot be argued, a “Joseph hearing” needs to be conducted. A Green Card holder is not “properly included” within a mandatory detention category if the “Service is substantially unlikely to establish at the merits hearing, or on appeal, the charges that would otherwise subject the alien to mandatory detention.” Individuals who prevail at the Joseph hearing are entitled to have a bond hearing.
For example, if the person is charged with removability based on convictions for two crimes involving moral turpitude, consider whether there are possible challenges to (1) the existence of the convictions, and (2) the classification of the crimes as crimes involving moral turpitude. In Matter of Joseph, the BIA concluded that it was substantially unlikely that INS would succeed because Joseph’s conviction was not correctly classified as an aggravated felony. Although Matter of Joseph addressed only the situation where the conviction was wrongly classified as a crime that would trigger mandatory detention, in thinking about whether there is a conviction, take account of the availability of post-conviction relief.
Question: Assuming I cannot prevail at the Joseph Hearing, is there anything else I can do?
Answer: You can bring actions in the U.S. Federal District Courts challenging the mandatory detention. Such factors to bring the attention of the Judge will be the length of the detention and removal from the United States is unlikely. Also, the Supreme Court’s decision was premised on the finding that Kim conceded removability. Individuals intending to challenge removability should state clearly this intention at both the immigration court and in any habeas corpus actions. Cases where the person is challenging deportability may be distinguished from Kim on that basis.
At this point, it will be difficult, but we must continue to argue and fight for the rights of people who are subject to mandatory detention.
Filed under: Deportation, Detention, Immigration Law, immigration provisions, USCIS | Tagged: Deportation, Detention | Leave a comment »
Immigration Lawyer
Brian D. Lerner Immigration Attorney & Deportation Lawyer Blog 