• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

BALCA overturned the Certifying Officer+s denial of the labor certification

BALCA overturned the Certifying Officer’s denial of the labor certification, finding that the regulations that control placement of Sunday ads versus local and ethnic ads differ, and that the employer was not required to place the local ad in the newspaper “most likely to bring responses.”

BALCA overturns denial main

BALCA denial

Board of alien labor certification appeals

BALCA affirms LC denial due to notice of filing deficiency

BALCA Determines College Prep School Posting Does Not Satisfy On-Campus Recruitment Requirements

BALCA upheld the Certifying Officer’s denial, holding that advertisements posted at a college preparatory school constituted in-house advertisement and not on-campus recruitment at a college or university, and thus did not satisfy the professional pre-filing recruitment requirements of 20 CFR §656.17(e)(1)(ii)(A)–(J).

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/balca/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/balca-denial/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/balca-remanded-the-case-for-certification/

https://californiaimmigration.us/balca-affirms-lc-denial-due-to-notice-of-filing-deficiency/

BALCA Finds PERM Received Two Days After Recruitment Expired Was Timely Submitted

Where recruitment expired on a Saturday but the PERM application filed by mail was not received until Monday, BALCA overturned the Certifying Officer’s denial of the labor certification, finding that sufficient documentation was submitted to prove the date of mailing, and thus that the PERM application was timely filed.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/balca/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/balca-denial/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/balca-remanded-the-case-for-certification/

https://californiaimmigration.us/balca-affirms-denial-based-on-lack-of-proof-of-job-order/

BALCA Declines to Penalize Employer for Timing Inconsistency in 656.17(e)(2)

Where the employer filed the ETA Form 9089 within six months of the SWA job order, but notwithin 180 days, BALCA overturned the Certifying Officer’s denial, finding that it was unfair to punish the employer because of a potential conflict between the terms “6 months” and “180 days” found at 20 CFR §656.17(e)(2), which provides the timing requirements for when an employer must place an SWA job order and file an application for a nonprofessional occupation.

Board of alien labor certification appeals

BALCA and immigration

Labor certification questions and answers

The Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner

More PERM Reversals

  1. BALCA reversed the denial of the labor certification pursuant to its holdings in Matter of Chabad Lubavitch Center and Matter of Symantec Corporation. The Certifying Officer had denied the employer’s PERM application solely because the State Workforce Agency (SWA) job order and website posting did not state the geographic location with enough specificity to apprise applicants of travel requirements. BALCA held that this type of recruitment was not subject to 20 CFR §656.17(f).

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/balca/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/balca-denial/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/board-of-alien-labor-certification-appeals-balca/

https://californiaimmigration.us/balca-affirms-lc-denial-due-to-notice-of-filing-deficiency/

BALCA ordered that certification be granted, concluding that individuals “matched” by a State Workforce Agency (SWA) to a job order are not considered applicants for the PERM position because they have not affirmatively applied for the job.

BALCA reverses denial due to due process

BALCA denial

BALCA remanded the case for certification

BALCA affirms denial based on lack of proof of job order

BALCA reversed the denial, finding that the omission of a Spanish language requirement in the Notice of Filing (NOF) was not by itself fatal to the application where the overall text of the NOF was sufficient to apprise U.S. workers of the job opportunity.

BALCA overturns denial main

BALCA denial

Board of Alien labor certification appeals

BALCA reverses PERM denial based on reasoning in Brooklyn Amity School

BALCA Upholds Denial for Failure to Specify “Terms and Conditions”

  1. BALCA affirmed the denial of the PERM application, finding that by not including the benefit of free housing in its advertisements and Notice of Filing, the employer offered terms and conditions of employment less favorable than those offered to the alien, violating 20 CFR §656.17(f)(7).

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/balca/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/board-of-alien-labor-certification-appeals-balca/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/balca-denial/

https://californiaimmigration.us/balca-affirms-lc-denial-due-to-notice-of-filing-deficiency/

BALCA found that:

BALCA found that where the job title on the ETA 9089 (Business Dev. Specialist) was different from that listed in the ads (Business Dev. VP) there was still a sufficient nexus between the ads and the ETA 9089.

BALCA

BALCA denial

BALCA remanded the case certification

BALCA affirms lc denial due to notice of filinf deficiency

BALCA Vacates Denial Notwithstanding Incomplete ETA 9089

BALCA held that although the employer failed to include the alien’s relevant employment history on the ETA 9089, documentation confirming the employment was sent with the audit response and should have been considered by the CO.

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/balca/

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/balca-denial/

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/board-of-alien-labor-certification-appeals-balca/

https://californiaimmigration.us/balca-affirms-lc-denial-due-to-notice-of-filing-deficiency/