The court held that the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Pereira v. Sessions abrogated the Third Circuit’s decision in Orozco-Velasquez v. Attorney General, and thus found that, for purposes of the stop-time rule, a deficient Notice to Appear (NTA) that omits the time and date of appearance may not be cured with a later Notice of Hearing that provides the missing information.
Home » Immigration Articles » Third Circuit Says Defective NTA Cannot Be Cured by Subsequent Notice of Hearing Containing Omitted Information
Third Circuit Says Defective NTA Cannot Be Cured by Subsequent Notice of Hearing Containing Omitted Information
- 1 min read
Related Posts
New Case on the issuance of an NTA
The absence of a checked alien classification box on a Notice to Appear (Form I-862) does not, by itself, render the notice to appear fatally…
BIA Rules That Absence of a Checked Alien Classification Box Does Not Render an NTA Fatally Deficient
The BIA ruled that the absence of a checked alien classification box on a Notice to Appear (NTA) does not, by itself, render an NTA fatally…
Ninth Circuit Grants Rehearing En Banc in Case Involving Defective NTA Under Pereira
The Ninth Circuit granted rehearing en banc to revisit its prior decision filed on May 22, 2019, which held that a Notice to Appear that is defective under Pereira v.…
Court Says NTA That Is Defective Under Pereira Cannot Be Cured by a Subsequent Notice of Hearing
Concluding that Popa v. Holder had been effectively overruled, the Ninth Circuit heldthat a Notice to Appear (NTA) that is defective under Pereira v. Sessions cannot be cured by a…
Court Finds DHS’s Failure to Include Date and Time in NTA Was Not a Jurisdictional Flaw
The Seventh Circuit held that DHS’s failure to include the time and date of the petitioner’s hearing in the Notice to Appear (NTA) was a failure…