The Tenth Circuit granted the petition for review and remanded, holding that a significant increase in the level of persecution constitutes a material change in country conditions for purposes of INA §240(c)(7)(C). The court found that the BIA abused its discretion by denying on factually erroneous, legally frivolous, and logically unsound grounds the petitioner’s motion to reopen based on the significantly increased persecution of Christians in China in 2014 and 2015.
Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: Appeal, asylum, BIA, China, persecution, religious persecution |
Brian D. Lerner Immigration Attorney & Deportation Lawyer Blog 
Leave a comment