The BIA sustained the respondent’s appeal and remanded, holding that a notice to appear (NTA) that was served but never resulted in removal proceedings does not have “stop-time” effect for purposes of establishing eligibility for cancellation of removal pursuant to section 240A(d)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: BIA, board of immigration appeals, notice to appear, NTA, Stop-Time Rule |

Leave a comment