Supreme Court Holds That Only Substances Defined as “Controlled” Under §802 Trigger Removal
The Supreme Court reversed the Eighth Circuit, finding that INA §237(a)(2)(B)(i) triggers removal only when the government can prove a connection between an element of an immigrant’s drug conviction and a “controlled substance” as defined in 21 USC §802.
Removal of the conditional residence
Filed under: removal order | Tagged: controlled substance, drug crime, drug offense, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, removability, Removal, Removal of the Conditional Residence, Removal or Deportation Hearings, removal order, removal orders, Removal Proceedings |

Leave a comment