Board of Immigration Appeals erred as a matter of law in ruling aliens seeking discretionary relief can never demonstrate “exceptional circumstances.” Deciding whether exceptional circumstances are present requires a consideration of all facts in a specific case, including but not limited to the probability of the petitioner obtaining relief. Where petitioner began asylum process in 1996 and diligently pursued his claim but missed a hearing because he was traveling and his attorney was not immediately able to contact him and obtain consent to the entry of a representative appearance, petitioner was entitled to recision of his in absentia deportation order due to these extraordinary circumstances. Vukmirovic v. Holder – filed September 8, 2010
Filed under: asylum, BIA, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, USCIS | Tagged: asylum, BIA, Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner |
Brian D. Lerner Immigration Attorney & Deportation Lawyer Blog 
[…] Immigration Attorney BlogNeb. lawyers at odds on Pa. immigration-law ruling Lebanon Daily …Green Card Lottery USAFIS United States Immigration Part Two …Immigration Lawyer. Sarmiento Immigration Law Firm Family …Can we operate my aged record of a immigration lawyer?An Immigration Attorney Navigates LawsThe Anti-Immigration Hardliners Lose Another One! | The … Tags: attorney, cannot, family, Immigration, spouse, visa Posted in Immigration X Files: I Want To Believe Movie Review Generate Money by Designing Website […]
LikeLike