Politics | Brian D. Lerner Immigration Attorney & Deportation Lawyer Blog

Are H-1B’s gone yet?

Posted on June 9, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have a Masters Degree in Business Administration and want to obtain an H-1B. Are they all used up yet?

Answer: The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on May 24, 2005, that it has received approximately 6,400 H-1B petitions that will count against the Congressionally-mandated 20,000 cap exemption for fiscal year 2005 established by the H-1B Visa Reform Act of 2004. This would be for people with advanced degrees (not the normal type of H-1B.) The USCIS published an interim final rule on May 5, 2004, implementing the new H-1B cap exemption for foreign nationals holding U.S.-earned advanced degrees, pursuant to the H-1B Visa Reform Act of 2004. The Act exempts 20,000 H-1B visa numbers from the overall H-1B cap for foreign nationals holding masters or higher degrees from U.S. universities. Petitions seeking Fiscal Year 2005 H-1B visa numbers under the exemption received on or after May 12, 2005, will be accepted for filing.

The new regulations, which took effect on May 5, 2005, changed the H-1B filing procedures for FY 2005 and for future fiscal years. The regulations make available 20,000 new H-1B visas, only for foreign workers with a minimum master’s level degree from a U.S. academic institution, in addition to the Congressionally-mandated annual cap of 65,000 H-1B visas.

Question: About how many more remain this year for the advanced degree holders?

Answer: About 13,600 slots remain available for fiscal year 2005 (which ends on September 30, 2005). Only foreign nationals holding masters or higher degrees from U.S. universities are eligible for one of these numbers. Because the 65,000 cap has already been reached, H-1B employers seeking the services of foreign nationals who do not hold such degrees are restricted to filing petitions for a FY 2006 number (i.e., for employment commencing on or after October 1, 2005) unless a different cap exemption is applicable (e.g., the employer is an institution of higher education). Note that a new 20,000 cap exemption will apply for FY 2006. The USCIS will exempt the first 20,000 petitions for H-1B workers who have a master’s degree or higher from a U.S. institution of higher learning. After those 20,000 slots are filled, the USCIS will apply petitions for H-1B workers with a master’s degree or higher against the annual cap of 65,000. As a result, once the 20,000 numbers are used, an initial petition for an advanced-degree worker will be approved only if a number is available within the general 65,000 cap or the case is not subject to the cap under a different exemption (i.e., the employer is an institution of higher education).

Question: My friend has had an H-1B for almost 6 years and has had a Labor Certification pending for over 1 year. I heard you can only have an H-1B for 6 years maximum. What is he to do?

Answer: Post-Sixth Year H-1B Extensions Based on Long-Pending Permanent Residence Papers under what is known as AC-21 § 106(a)) allows for an extension if a labor certification or employment-based petition has been filed on behalf of the alien and remains pending for 365 days. Note the following issues clarified by the 2005 memo. Combined standard and post-sixth year H-1B extensions permitted. To obtain a post-sixth year H-1B extension, there is no need for the foreign national to first request an extension of time through the completion of his or her initial six years and then request an additional extension of time beyond the six-year limit. The petitioner can request an extension that combines the remaining time in the initial six-year H-1B period and post-sixth year time. Post-sixth year time can only be granted in one-year increments, and the total period of extension cannot exceed three years.

Question: When should the extension be filed?

Answer: The post-sixth year extension request can be filed prior to the passage of 365 days from the filing of a qualifying labor certification or I-140 petition, as long as the qualifying labor certification or I-140 petition has or will have been pending for 365 days prior to the foreign national’s requested extension start date. However, the extension will not be granted if the foreign national will not be in H-1B status at the time that the 365 days have elapsed, i.e., where there is a gap in status.

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: art, H-1B, Immigration, Politics | Leave a comment »

PERM: LULAC and CSS are still not over

Posted on June 8, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I think I’m under LULAC, but never knew I could file again. I believed I missed the deadline. Is there anything I could do?

Answer: Yes. U.S Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced today that the filing deadline for applications for legalization under the terms of the CSS and LULAC (Newman) settlement agreements is extended from May 23, 2005 until December 31, 2005.

This is not a new amnesty program. The CSS and LULAC (Newman) settlement agreements allow for those who meet certain requirements to apply or reapply for Temporary Resident status under the 1986 amnesty program of Section 245A of Immigration and Nationality Act.

Eligible individuals may apply by submitting a Form I-687, Application for Status as a Temporary Resident under Section 245A of the Immigration and Nationality Act, and a CSS/ LULAC (Newman) Class Membership Worksheet.

Question: What are the basic requirements to be eligible?

Answer: 1) You had to live in the United States unlawfully from before January 1, 1982, to a date between May 5, 1987, and May 4, 1988, when you went to an office of the Immigration Service or a Qualified Designated entity to apply for legalization.

2) You, your parent or your spouse visited an INS office or Qualified Designated Entity between May 5, 1987, and May 4, 1988, to apply for legalization.

3) The INS or QDE told you that you were ineligible for legalization because you had traveled outside the United States without INS permission. You, your spouse or your parent returned to the United States with an immigration issued document such as a Student Visa, Visitor Visa or some other Immigration issued document.

4) You do NOT need to have previously “registered” as a LULAC class member or even had a completed application. However, you did need to go the QDE in the specified time period.

Question: What type of evidence do I need to present to win under this LULAC Settlement agreement?

Answer: Clearly, many people do not have the original documents, or even any stamped documents from Immigration. Usually, if the former INS had rejected the application because of what is known as ‘front-desking’, the person was just turned away. Thus, it is not possible in many instances for an applicant to prove that they were rejected. However, the LULAC settlement specifically states that persons who fall under this settlement may establish eligibility for legalization by way of declarations, and not only by original documents. The settlement also provides class members the right to appeal to a “special master,” a judicial officer with the authority to correct the CIS’s errors in the event the agency does not decide a class member’s legalization application promptly, fairly, and in accordance with the settlement’s guidelines.

Question: When can I apply for this?

Answer: The settlement provides that CIS must begin accepting legalization applications no later than May 24, 2004, but the government might decide to begin the one-year application somewhat earlier. This means that individuals will now have until December 2005, to apply for legalization under the settlement.

Question: Is there any other previous amnesty related provisions that this settlement agreement is applicable toward?

Answer: Actually there are others. Catholic Social Services is another program that is applicable to this settlement agreement. There are a couple of differences. First, you would have had to travel outside the U.S. without authorization after November 6, 1986. Second, you returned to the U.S. without permission.

Therefore, since it has been extended, do not let the deadline pass again if you qualify.

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: history, Immigration, news, Politics, travel | Leave a comment »

PERM: The Online Perm System

Posted on June 5, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I understand that the new PERM applications can be submitted online. However, where the employer has established a sub-account for an attorney or agent is the attorney or agent permitted to submit applications on-line?

Answer: Yes, attorney or agent may submit applications under the following circumstances. An employer must complete the registration process as explained at http://www.plc.doleta.gov, including the initial log-in. During the initial log-in, the employer will change the employer’s temporary password (as assigned by the system during registration) and once logged-in, the employer can establish a sub-account for an attorney or agent. The employer will select a username for the attorney or agent, and the system will assign a temporary password. The attorney or agent will receive an e-mail with the username, temporary password, and the employer’s PIN. When the attorney or agent logs in and changes the attorney’s or agent’s password, the attorney or agent is then permitted to complete and submit applications on-line on behalf of the employer using the PIN of the employer in whose name the application is being filed.

Question: Are there any circumstances under which mailing in a labor certification application would prove more successful than electronically submitting an application on-line?

Answer: No, mailing-in an application will not prove more successful, as the mailed-in application, upon receipt at the National Processing Center, is date stamped. Until the application is data entered into the system by a data entry person (using the exact information shown on the form 9089), processing will not begin on the application. Once entered in the system, the mailed-in application receives the exact same automated analysis and manual scrutiny as an application submitted electronically. If there are two identical applications, one submitted electronically and one mailed-in, there will be no difference in how they are processed. The only difference will be in processing time; a mailed-in application will take longer, as not only mailing but also the data entry time will be involved. Remember: the on-line system will identify mistakes (e.g. entering four digits for a zip code instead of five digits) before allowing the application to be submitted, but the data entry person must enter the information exactly as shown on the application; a mistake on the form may trigger an audit or denial.

Question: Are there some tips you might have to get the process done quicker?

Answer: DOL verifies the existence of each employer that attempts to register. At first, this process went very quickly and employers received their PIN numbers and passwords sometimes within hours. Now that more employers are registering, it is taking an average of two weeks to get feedback on a registration. Because of the length of time it’s taking to register an employer, some are attempting to register multiple times, thus exacerbating the problem.

In many cases, DOL is sending back emails indicating that it cannot verify the employer’s existence and/or asking for documentation to verify that existence. DOL provided some pointers to avoid these requests or, if received, to respond to them:

• On the form, please make sure that the company’s Headquarters address is included as the company address. You can put the address of the office where the beneficiary will work in the appropriate box, but it’s the overall corporate address that is pivotal on the “existence check”.

• Avoid “doing business as (dba)” names wherever possible, and instead use the company’s legal name. The dba may complicate an existence check.

• For companies that have several EINs, please use the EIN that the company had when it filed its articles of incorporation. If a separately incorporated subsidiary is registering, do use that subsidiary’s EIN, but don’t use a different EIN if the employer is just a division, or otherwise is not a legally separate entity.

• The DOL recognizes that the Form SS-4 may not be readily available to some employers. If you’ve received a request for documentation to verify the employer’s existence that requests a Form SS-4, the DOL indicates that it will accept the employer’s most recent quarterly tax return instead. It has recently changed its requests to include that option, but if you received one of the old requests that give no alternative to the Form SS-4, please be advised that the quarterly tax return is nonetheless an option.

• To create a sub-account for an attorney, the employer must log on using the designated PIN and password and create the account.

• The employer can view all filings prepared by attorneys for which it has set up sub-accounts, but an attorney can view only the applications he or she has done, and cannot view any filings done by the employer or its other attorneys.

• Because DOL wants the employer to be answerable for the process, an attorney will need to have a separate user account and password for each of its client companies. DOL realizes the difficulties this presents in managing multiple passwords, but is insistent on this system.

• When an employer registers, it gets two emails, one providing the PIN and one providing a password. The employer is then supposed to log on and change the password to one of its own choosing. DOL notes that some employers have been simply forwarding the PIN and password to the attorney, and then the attorney logs in and changes the password. The employer then loses control of the account, as it no longer has control of the password. DOL asks that employers make the password change themselves, as DOL want the employer to maintain control of the master account.

• Some employers have been having trouble receiving the emails with the PINs and passwords because of their spam filters. Because they come in two consecutive emails from the same sender—Dept. of Labor—some spam filters clear the emails out into the spam box. This, apparently, is a particular problem with those who use AOL as their ISP. One solution DOL suggests (apart from checking your spam box) is to create a free email account on Yahoo or hotmail for this purpose and thereby bypass the AOL filters. You might also be able to turn off some of AOL’s spam blocking.

Therefore, it seems as though it might take some time to get used to, but once familiar, it should go faster.

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: business, Immigration, news, Politics, small-business | Leave a comment »

How can I petition a helper from Mexico?

Posted on June 4, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have a business that I have started in the U.S. I am from the Philippines and my business partner is from Mexico. We would like to petition someone from Mexico and another person from Singapore. Can you give me an option of what needs to be done?

Answer: Prior to January 1, 2004 there was what was known as NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement.) While it still exists, there are some changes which have just gone into effect. This will answer your question on how to petition the person from Mexico. Mexican Nonimmigrants (“TN”) Professionals have newer, easier and faster procedures for coming in under this type of visa.

Under the new provisions of the NAFTA, the petition requirements employers wanting to hire Mexican professionals under the provisions of the NAFTA will no longer be required to obtain a certified labor condition application from the US Department of Labor or file Form I-129 with the USCIS. In many cases, this procedure would take six months to one year. Now, Mexican professionals desiring a free trade visa will apply directly to a US Department of State consular office in Mexico for the visa. This will allow you to petition for him/her much quicker as the application can be sent directly to the U.S. Consulate.

Question: What if one of the Mexican nationals I cam considering hiring is already in the U.S. on another status. Must he leave the U.S.?

Answer: No. Extensions and changes of nonimmigrant status for NAFTA professionals in TN classification will continue to be processed by the USCIS. Extension and change of status applications for TN nonimmigrant professionals must be submitted to the Nebraska Service Center for processing, accompanied by a letter from the US or foreign employer stating the activity to be engaged in, the anticipated length of stay, and the arrangements for remuneration.

Question: Do these new NAFTA provisions apply to my prospective worker from Singapore?

Answer: No. ‘TN’ visas under NAFTA apply only to persons from Mexico and Canada. However, there has been an implementation of New Chile and Singapore Free Trade Agreements as of January 1, 2004. Under the immigration provisions of these agreements, as approved by Congress in Public Laws 108-77 and 108-78, a new H-1B1 nonimmigrant category has been created for professionals from Chile and Singapore. For purposes of the trade agreements, a professional is defined as “a national of [Chile or Singapore] who is engaged in a specialty occupation requiring (a) theoretical and practical application of a body of specialized knowledge; and (b) attainment of a post-secondary degree in the specialty requiring four or more years of study (or the equivalent of such a degree) as a minimum for entry into the occupation.”

In addition, the two agreements allow for the presentation of alternate educational credentials in the case of certain Chilean citizens seeking admission as H-1B1 Agricultural Managers and Physical Therapists. Further, in the case of both countries, the two agreements allow persons seeking admission as Management Consultants to present alternative documentation reflecting experience in the area of specialization. By statute, Chile will be allocated a maximum of 1,400, and Singapore a maximum of 5,400 H-1B1 nonimmigrant visas annually for professionals from these countries.

Question: Where must the people from Singapore apply?

Answer: Citizens of Chile or Singapore must apply directly to the US Department of State overseas for an H-1B1 nonimmigrant visa to be eligible for admission to perform professional services for a US employer pursuant to the two trade agreements. As with the provisions of the NAFTA, the USCIS will only process requests for extensions and changes of nonimmigrant status to H-1B1 nonimmigrant professional for citizens of Chile and Singapore. USCIS will not accept initial requests for H-1B1 status under the two Free Trade Agreements.

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: Immigration, news, Politics, travel, travel-tips | Leave a comment »

Removal Proceedings – What is it?

Posted on June 3, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I am now in removal proceedings. I also have many friends who are in the same type of removal proceedings. However, all of us have different situations. Under what basis can we be put into removal proceedings?

Answer: The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), an agency of the Department of Justice, oversees three components which adjudicate matters involving immigration law matters at both the trial and appellate level. Under the Office of the Chief Immigration Judge, more than 200 Immigration Judges located in 53 Immigration Courts nationwide conduct proceedings and decide individual cases. The agency includes the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which hears appeals of Immigration Judge decisions, and the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, which handles employment-related immigration matters.

Immigration Judges conduct removal proceedings, which account for approximately 80 percent of their caseload. Removal hearings are conducted to determine whether certain aliens are subject to removal from the country. Beginning April 1, 1997, the distinction between exclusion and deportation proceedings was eliminated, and aliens subject to removal from the United States were all placed in removal proceedings. Thus, the removal proceeding is now generally the sole procedure for determining whether an alien is inadmissible, deportable, or eligible for relief from removal. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is responsible for commencing a removal proceeding.

Removal proceedings generally require an Immigration Judge to make two findings: (1) a determination of the alien’s removability from the United States, and (2) thereafter deciding whether the alien is eligible for a form of relief from removal.

Usually at the beginning, an Immigration Judge conducts a bond redetermination hearing for aliens who are in DHS detention. The person in proceedings makes a request to the Immigration Judge to lower or eliminate the amount of the bond set by the DHS. These hearings are generally informal and are not a part of the removal proceedings. This decision can be appealed by either the alien or by DHS to the BIA.

Question: One of my friends actually already has their Green Card. Why would he be in removal proceedings?

Answer: An Immigration Judge can conducts a rescission hearing to determine whether a lawful permanent resident (LPR) should have his or her residency status rescinded because he or she was not entitled to it when it was granted. Additionally, it is possible for someone who is an LPR to commit a crime making them ineligible to keep their Green Card.

Question: What about someone who fears going back to their home country?

Answer: An asylum-only hearing will be used to determine whether certain aliens who are not entitled to a removal hearing but claim a well-founded fear of persecution in their home country are eligible for asylum. In normal circumstances, asylum claims are heard by Immigration Judges during the course of a removal hearing.

Thus, there are many different types of hearings that can be conducted. There is many times relief from removal proceedings, so you need to fight hard during the proceedings and do not let anyone walk over your rights.

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: donald-trump, history, Immigration, news, Politics | Leave a comment »

My child is a U.S. Citizen – and I didn’t even know!

Posted on June 2, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: We just petitioned our child after not seeing him in our home country for over 2 years. He will be coming to the U.S. as a Lawful Permanent Resident. When can we apply for citizenship for him?

Answer: On October 30, 2000, the Child Citizenship Act of 2000 (CCA) was signed into law. The new law permitted foreign-born children (including adopted children) to acquire citizenship automatically if they meet certain requirements. It became effective on February 27, 2001.

Question: Which Children Automatically Become Citizens Under the CCA?

Answer: Since February 27, 2001, certain foreign-born children of U.S. citizens (including adopted children) residing permanently in the United States acquired citizenship automatically. The term “child” is defined differently under immigration law for purposes of naturalization than for other immigration purposes, including adoption. To be eligible, a child must meet the definition of “child” for naturalization purposes under immigration law, and must also meet the following requirements: The child has at least one United States citizen parent (by birth or naturalization); The child is under 18 years of age; The child is currently residing permanently in the United States in the legal and physical custody of the United States citizen parent; The child has been admitted to the United States as a lawful permanent resident or has been adjusted to this status; An adopted child must also meet the requirements applicable to the particular provision under which they qualified for admission as an adopted child under immigration law. Acquiring citizenship automatically means citizenship is acquired by operation of law, without the need to apply for citizenship.

Question: Must an application be filed with USCIS to establish a child’s citizenship?

Answer: No. If a child qualifies for citizenship under the Child Citizenship Act, the child’s citizenship status is no longer dependent on USCIS approving a naturalization application. The child’s parents may, however, file an application for a certificate of citizenship on the child’s behalf to obtain evidence of citizenship. If a child satisfies the requirements listed above, he or she automatically acquires U.S. citizenship by operation of law either on the day of admission to the United States or on the day that the last condition for acquiring citizenship is satisfied.

Question: Will Eligible Children Automatically Receive Proof of Citizenship?

Answer: If the child falls under this provision, they will automatically receive a Certificate of Citizenship within 45 days of admission into the U.S. This program eliminates the need for the issuance of a Permanent Resident Card for newly entering children, since these cards are not applicable to U.S. citizens.

In other words, if the child falls under this provision of law, the moment they are admitted as a Lawful Permanent Resident, they are immediately considered to be a U.S. Citizen.

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: Citizenship, history, Immigration, news, Politics | Leave a comment »

PERM: More on Terrorism.

Posted on May 28, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have heard a great deal of new regulations and rules regarding anti-terrorism efforts. Have there been any new provisions recently that have been added?

Answer: Yes. If you are in Immigration Court and have submitted several different types of applications, there is a new procedure being implemented which is another layer of security checks.

Question: Which applications are applicable?

Answer: The applications are divided into two areas. First, if you apply for Asylum and Withholding of Removal. Secondly would be if you are applying for Adjustment of Status, Cancellation of Removal for Lawful Permanent Residents, Cancellation of Removal for Non Permanent Residents, Suspension of Deportation or Special NACARA Suspension of Deportation.

Question: If you are applying for the first category of Asylum and Withholding of Removal, what must you now do?

Answer: You must send certain documents now to the USCIS Nebraska Service Center. It should be entitled ‘Defensive Asylum Application with Immigration Court.’ You need to send a clear copy of the first three pages of your completed Form I-589 (Application for Asylum and for Withholding of Removal) that you will be filing or have filed with the Immigration Court, which must include your full name, your current mailing address, and your alien number (A number). Do Not submit any documents other than the first three pages of the completed I-589) and (2) A copy of Form EOIR–28 (Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Representative before the Immigration Court) if you are represented by an attorney.

Question: What will happen after these documents are sent in?

Answer: A USCIS receipt notice in the mail indicating that USCIS has received your asylum application, and an Application Support Center (ASC) notice for you and each dependent included in your application. Each ASC noticewill indicate the individual’s unique receipt number and will provide instructions for each person to appear for an appointment at a nearby ASC for collection of biometrics (such as your photograph, fingerprints, and signature). You should receive the notice within three weeks after submitting the documents to the USCIS in Nebraska. You (and your dependents) must then attend the biometrics appointment at the ASC, and obtain a biometrics confirmation document before leaving the ASC, and retain your ASC biometrics confirmation as proof that your biometrics were taken, and bring it to your future Immigration Court hearings.

Question: What is the procedure for the other applications you stated will be filed in Immigration Court?

Answer: A clear copy of the entire application form that you will be filing or have filed with the Immigration Court. (Do not submit any documents other than the completed form itself); (2) the appropriate application fee; (3) the $70 USCIS biometrics fee and (4) A copy of Form EOIR–28 (Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Representative before the Immigration Court) if you are represented. You should send it to the USCIS Texas Service Center.

Question: After you send these documents to Texas, will the same procedure be followed as with the Asylum application.

Answer: Most of it is exactly the same. However, with these applications, after you receive your biometrics appointment and get your fingerprints taken, you must file the following with the Immigration Court within the time period directed by the Immigration Judge: (1) the original application Form, (2) all supporting documentation, and (3) the USCIS notice that instructs you to appear for an appointment at the ASC.

Hopefully, this new procedure will not delay proceedings and will move efficiently through the process.

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: Immigration, news, Politics, travel, Visa | Leave a comment »

Why am I penalized because my father became a U.S. Citizen?

Posted on May 27, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have been waiting many years to become a Lawful Permanent Resident. My father petitioned me many years ago. My priority date was almost current, and then my father became a U.S. Citizen. Afterwards, I actually had to wait many more years. He only became a U.S. Citizen because he thought it would speed up the process. Is there anything I can do?

Answer: Actually, the Child Status Protection Act (CSPA) had a provision that addressed your exact concern. On August 6, 2002, the President signed into law the Child Status Protection Act (CSPA), Public Law 107-208, 116 Stat. 927. Section 6 of the CSPA allows for unmarried sons or daughters of lawful permanent residents (LPRs) to remain classified as second preference aliens, even if the LPR parent naturalizes. In other words, this provision actually applies only to people from the Philippines at this point as in the rest of the world the priority date is years closer when the parent petitioner becomes a U.S. Citizen.

Section 6 of the CSPA provides for the automatic transfer of preference categories when the parent of an unmarried son or daughter naturalizes, but also provides the unmarried son or daughter the ability to request that such transfer not occur. There are certain instances when the visa availability dates are more current for the unmarried sons or daughters of LPRs than for the unmarried sons or daughters of United States citizens. In such instances, it would be to the advantage of the alien beneficiary to request that the automatic conversion to the first preference category not occur because a visa would become available sooner if the alien remained in the second preference category than if he converted to the first preference category. As of this date, the Department of State Visa Bulletin shows that visa availability in the first preference category is more current than for the second preference categories, except for beneficiaries from the Philippines. As such, it is anticipated that only beneficiaries from the Philippines will seek to take advantage of the CSPA.

Question: I heard about the CSPA and was told to write a letter that I wanted to go back to the 2nd preference, not to stay at the 1^st preference which I automatically was move to at the time my father had petitioned me. I did not know who to write the letter to, but sent off such a letter requesting to be changed to 2^nd preference. However, to date nothing has changed.

Answer: I agree that this has been a problem. In the past, we would write Immigration and they would tell us to write the National Visa Center. Then, we would write the National Visa Center and they would tell us to write Immigration. It was a game of finger pointing without any resolution. However, guidance from Immigration has just come out.

All beneficiaries in the Philippines wishing to opt out of the automatic conversion must file a request, in writing, addressed to the Officer in Charge, Manila. The Officer in Charge shall provide written notification, on official U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services letterhead, of a decision on the beneficiary’s request to the beneficiary and to the Department of State’s visa issuance unit. If the beneficiary’s request is approved, then the beneficiary’s eligibility for family-based immigration will be determined as if his or her parent had never naturalized and they will remain a second preference alien.

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: family, history, Immigration, Politics, travel | Leave a comment »

PERM: Backlog Reduction: What does it mean?

Posted on May 26, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have had a Labor Certification pending for several years. I understand the new PERM process is the new way of doing a Labor Certification. However, I am thinking that I would like to keep my current Labor Certification without converting it to PERM. How can I do this?

Answer: All of the current Labor Certifications have been or will be sent to the Backlog Reduction Centers. The names of these centers mean exactly what is indicated. They are opened for the sole purpose of reducing the entire backlog of old Labor Certifications. Once every old Labor Certification has been processed, the Backlog Reduction Centers will close.

Question: How many Applications have been shipped from the local processing centers prior to the newly created Backlog Reduction Centers?

Answer: Slightly over 180,000.

Question: How many applications have had data input into the new database systems?

Answer: Approximately 86,000.

Question: How many 45 day letters have gone out to indicate that the Petitioner and Beneficiary still want to continue with the Labor Certification at the Backlog Reduction Center?

Answer: Over 40,000.

Question: What is the number of hired/trained contractor personnel at each Backlog Reduction Center site?

Answer: Approximately 100 at each site (Atlanta and Chicago.)

Question: Will Atlanta/Chicago continue to process traditional cases after March 28, 2005?

Answer: They will keep some temporary work only. They are in the process of shipping all other cases to Backlog Reduction Centers. There are approximately 10,000 in total.

Question: Have contractors begun to review cases for substantive compliance with the necessary guidelines? If not, when is this expected to happen?

Answer: Yes and the Department of Labor are in training now.

Question: Is it actually possible that the backlog reduction process can be complete in two years? If not, what is the current projection?

Answer: It seems that as of now, the current projection is 24 to 30 months. Of course, this could markedly change.

Question: When do they expect to complete initial data entry on all cases?

Answer: The goal at this time is to finish data entry on all cases by the end of summer 2005. It seems that no actual process will be performed on the case until initial entry log in is complete.

Question: Will there be an on-line system available to check the status of cases?

Answer: The Department of Labor is working on getting information on their website about which cases have shipped. They are also working on an e-mail capability to enable a party to find out whether a case is located at the Backlog Reduction Center. The contractor staff would answer the e-mails.

Question: In what order will they process the cases?

Answer: They expect to process them based upon when they were originally filed. In other words, the older it was filed, the sooner it should get processed.

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: ai, artificial-intelligence, business, news, Politics | Leave a comment »

PERM: Backlog Reduction: What does it mean?

Posted on May 25, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney