• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Agricultural Workers for Temporary Employment

Hiring of agricultural workers for temporary employment have been an on going issue in immigration where abuse in regulations observed. DOL issued an advance copy of the final rule amending its regulations on the temporary agricultural employment of H-2A aliens in the U.S. A full article regarding hiring procedures will be published in the Federal Register on 2/12/10.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/agricultural-workers/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/migrant-seasonal-and-agricultural-worker-protection-act/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/agricultural/

https://californiaimmigration.us/temporary-agricultural-employment-h-2a-provides-answer-to-the-immigration-regulations-of-federal-procedure-to-illegal-workers-in-this-area/

Employment woes in the US have decreased the number of unauthorized immigrant population

The decrease in available jobs in the US. have also decreased the number of unauthorized immigration. DHS released a report estimating that the unauthorized immigrant population living in the U.S. decreased to 10.8 million in January 2009 and grew by 27 percent between 2000 and 2009.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/employment/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/employment-adjustment/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/employment-based-immigration/

https://californiaimmigration.us/employment/

Family and Employment based on preferential categories

The DOS offers an Annual Report of immigration visa applicants in both the family and employment based on preferential categories. The document reports the number of actual cases that were registered by the National Visa Center as of 11/1/09.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/employment/

https://californiaimmigration.us/employment/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/employment-visas/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/employment-based/

New Regulation on Applicant and Petitioners representation

In light of recent changes in policy USCIS issued a list of questions and answers on the new DHS regulation that clarifies who is authorized to represent applicants and petitioners in cases before DHS and updates in policy standards and disciplinary procedures for these immigration practitioners.

California Immigration Lawyer

Immigration Attorney near me

California Immigration

New regulation on applicant representation

Regulations regarding representation and conduct

Comments and discussion regarding question regarding guidelines of conduct in representation will be encouraged during conference. DHS issued an interim rule amending its regulations on representation and appearances by, and professional conduct of, practitioners in immigration practice. This interim rule is effective 3/4/10. Written comments must be submitted by 3/4/10.

Legal representation

Material representation

Notice of representation questions and answers

Regulations regarding representation and conduct

 

 

 

 

Mexican immigration will undergo changes by June 2010

In an effort to regulate and establish more uniform guidelines changes have been made to Mexico’s immigration procedure. The government has on 01/29/10, Mexico’s National Migration Institute published its Manual of Criteria and Migration Procedures. The Manual will be enforced as of 5/1/10 throughout the 32 delegations of the National Migration Institute in Mexico.

Mexican Immigration

Are you a Mexican citizen?

Immigration Lawyer near me

How can I petition a helper from Mexico?

Filing H-1B may face tougher guidelines

New guidelines are issued for the H-1B regarding more substantial proof of employee and employer relationship existence. USCIS invites national stakeholders to a teleconference on 2/18/10 to discuss the implementation of the memo issued on 1/8/10 which provides guidance on determining if a valid employer-employee relationship exists. In light of recent fraud cases appearing at major immigration firms constituted some way of determining valid employment of applicant of the   H-1B.

H-1B Attorney

Amended H-1B petition

H-1B process

H-1B Cap: Questions and answers

US Economic Policy on H-1B and L-1 Visa

Are US companies taking advantage of cheap labor in H-1B Visa applicants? This is the question some government officials are asking. The Economic Policy Institute released a briefing paper titled “Bridge to Immigration or Cheap Temporary Labor? The H-1B & L-1 Visa Programs Are a Source of Both.”

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/h-1b/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/l1b/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/l1-intracompany-transferee-petition/

https://californiaimmigration.us/h-1bs-cap-reached/

Can they deport me again?

Question: I was deported years ago and could not stay away from my wife any longer. I reentered the U.S. illegally and am now reunited with my wife. Can they deport me again?

Answer: Removal pursuant to §241(a)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) – the reinstatement of removal provision – accounts for 40% of all removals nationwide, and two-thirds of nationwide reinstatements take place within the Ninth Circuit.

Question: What is reinstatement of removal?

Answer: Reinstatement of removal is the term for removal pursuant to INA §241(a) (5). Reinstatement of removal orders against those illegally reentering if the Attorney General finds that an alien has reentered the United States illegally after having been removed or having departed voluntarily, under an order of removal, the prior order of removal is reinstated from its original date and is not subject to being reopened or reviewed. The alien is not eligible and may not apply for any relief under this chapter, and the alien shall be removed under the prior order at any time after the reentry.

Reinstatement orders (or orders of reinstatement) are issued by low-level immigration officers, not immigration judges. The orders may be executed within hours or days. Due to the lack of a hearing and speed at which the orders are executed and issued, removal under INA §241(a)(5) is sometimes called summary removal.

Significantly, individuals subject to INA §241(a)(5) are “not eligible and may not apply for any relief” under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Question: Who is subject to reinstatement of removal?

Answer: Noncitizens who return to the United States illegally after having been removed under a prior order of deportation, exclusion, or removal are subject to removal under §241(a)(5) unless they meet a statutory or judicial exemption.

Question: Who is statutorily exempt from reinstatement of removal under INA §241(a)(5)?

Question: Congress has enacted legislation that specifically exempts the following individuals from being subject to reinstatement of removal: Individuals applying for adjustment of status under INA §245A (the legalization program) who are covered by certain class action lawsuits. Nicaraguans and Cuban applicants for adjustment under §202 of the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act of 1997 (NACARA). Salvadoran, Guatemalan, and Eastern European applicants under NACARA and Haitian applicants for adjustment under the Haitian Refugee Immigration Fairness Act of 1998 (HRIFA).

Question: Who is judicially exempt from reinstatement of removal under INA §241(a)(5)?

Answer: Litigation in the courts of appeals has resulted in a number of case law exemptions to §241(a)(5). The First, Seventh, and Eleventh Circuits who applied for discretionary relief before April 1, 1997; and the Ninth Circuit who filed an application for adjustment of status and application for permission to reapply for admission to the United States after deportation or removal (aka I-212 waiver) prior to the reinstatement determination.

Question: After issuance of a reinstatement order, can a person apply for any “relief” from removal?

Answer: A final reinstatement order triggers the bar to relief in INA §241(a)(5). However, DHS has previously taken the position that withholding of removal is not a form of relief because it is mandatory, not discretionary. Thus, if a person expresses a fear of return during the reinstatement process, the regulations provide for an interview with an asylum officer. If an asylum officer determines that the person has a “reasonable fear of persecution or torture,” he or she may apply for withholding before an immigration judge.

Question: If the person did not leave under the order of deportation, can it be reinstated?

Answer: No. If the client has not departed since the prior order was issued, then he or she cannot be subject to reinstatement under INA §241(a) (5) because the statute requires an illegal reentry “after having been removed or having departed voluntarily, under an order of removal.”

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/cancellation-for-removal/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/forms-of-relief-in-a-removal-hearing/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/final-order-of-removal/

https://californiaimmigration.us/how-a-deportation-attorney-can-help-you-win-a-cancellation-of-removal-for-non-permanent-residents/

 

Is it possible to go back to USA after life deportation?

It is possible to come back, but some will depend on why you were deported, how long the deportation bar was and whether you have any petitions pending. Generally, you need to do the Permission to Reenter, Waiver of the 10 year bar and Consulate Processing. I would need more specifics from your case.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation-lawyer/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation-attorneys/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation-order/

https://californiaimmigration.us/removal/winning-a-deportation-proceeding-from-an-immigration-lawyer-and-deportation-attorney/