The Supreme Court strikes down the BIA 212(c) ruling of ‘comparable ground of excludability’ – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/UYQKN
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia-2/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia-3/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/appeal-to-bia/
https://californiaimmigration.us/bia-deference-given-to-particulary-serious-crime/
Filed under: BIA | Tagged: BIA, bia board of immigration appeals, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer | Leave a comment »
Video: What is the legal basis the Supreme Court used to rule why the BIA’s 212(c) ruling was arbitrary – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/a43lH
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia-2/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/appeal-to-bia/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia/
https://californiaimmigration.us/circuit-court-of-appeal-reverses-bia-denial-of-asylum/
Filed under: BIA | Tagged: BIA, bia board of immigration appeals, BIA Pro Bono Project, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer | Leave a comment »
Video: The new Supreme Court case rules that the BIA rule under 212(c) is arbitrary and capricious – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/Z5966
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia-board-of-immigration-appeals/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia-board-of-immigration-appeals/
https://californiaimmigration.us/bia-rules-on-step-child/
Filed under: BIA | Tagged: BIA, bia board of immigration appeals, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer | Leave a comment »
Video: A crime of violence normally would not be eligible for 212(c) relief – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/xAbEf
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/212h-2/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/212/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/212c/
Filed under: 212(c) | Tagged: 212, 212(c), Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer | Leave a comment »
Video: What exactly is 212(c) relief? – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/RPrq5
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/212/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/212c/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/212c-waiver-application/
Filed under: 212(c) | Tagged: 212(c), Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer | Leave a comment »
Video: What is the difference between ‘Inadmissibility’ and ‘deportability’ – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/yI2rJ
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/criminal-grounds-of-inadmissibility/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/waivers-of-inadmissibility/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/inadmissibility/
https://californiaimmigration.us/hiv-no-longer-on-inadmissibility-list/
Filed under: Waivers of Inadmissibility | Tagged: deportability, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, inadmissibility | Leave a comment »
Video: The Supreme Court has spoken: BLAKE is not the Law. 212(c) available. – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/5NpkG
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/212c/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/212c-waiver-application/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/%c2%a7212c/
Filed under: 212(c) | Tagged: 212(c), Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer | Leave a comment »
BALCA vacated the denial where the employer made every effort to comply with §655.10(a)(2) but was simply unable to file its application in time for its season as a result of the NPWC’s delay in issuing the PWD.
https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/h-2b/
https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/h-2b-cap/
https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/h-2b-petitions/
https://californiaimmigration.us/visas/h-2b-temporary-worker/
Filed under: H-2B | Tagged: Atty.Brian D. Lerner, §655.10(a)(2), BALCA, H-2B, Immigration Lawyer, NPWC, PWD | Leave a comment »
The Board found that any period of continuous residence or continuous physical presence ends upon service of an NTA on the alien, even if the NTA does not include the date and time of the initial hearing.
https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/bia-2/
https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/bia-3/
https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/appeal-to-bia/
https://californiaimmigration.us/bia-deference-given-to-particulary-serious-crime/
Filed under: BIA | Tagged: Atty.Brian D. Lerner, BIA, continuous residence, Immigration Lawyer, NTA, Stop-Time Rule | Leave a comment »
The Board found the respondent was admitted to the U.S. when he adjusted status under the Cuban Adjustment Act, and was thus subject to removal under INA § 237(a) following a drug trafficking conviction.
https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/bia-2/
https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/bia/
https://californiaimmigration.us/bia-deference-given-to-particulary-serious-crime/
Filed under: BIA | Tagged: Atty.Brian D. Lerner, BIA, Cuban Refugee Adjustment Act, Immigration Lawyer, INA § 237(a) | Leave a comment »
Immigration Lawyer
Brian D. Lerner Immigration Attorney & Deportation Lawyer Blog 