• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Immigration Questions


via IFTTT

SIJ Petition or Asylum or Humanitarian Parole


via IFTTT

Humanitarian reinstatement preserves I-130 petitions after a petitioner’s death, providing beneficiaries a chance to continue.⁣ ⁣ #humanitarianreinstatement⁣ #immigrationpetition⁣ #i130⁣ #petitioner⁣ #immigrationlawyer⁣ #americanimmigration⁣ #undocumentedimmigrants

A new way to beat Deportation

Question: I have been here in the U.S. since I was six years old. About 12 years ago, I committed a drug crime of possession for sale. I was sentenced to 4 months. Now, all these years later, I have been put into removal proceedings where INS is trying to deport me. I have been told that I am an aggravated felon and there is nothing I can do. I have further been told that I will most likely be deported away from my family including my U.S. Citizen spouse and three U.S. Citizen Children. I have never done anything else criminally and it was just a stupid mistake when I was young. I have changed, have a good job, a family with U.S. Citizens and many community ties. Is there anything I can do?

Answer: As the law stands now, there is very little you can do. This is a result of the 1996 laws which increased dramatically the laws on what was considered to be an aggravated felony. It has torn families apart for many years since 1996. People who have become long term residents in the U.S. and have their Green Cards found out it did not make any difference. They were still deported. Furthermore, they found out that they were barred from coming back into the U.S. for the rest of their lives. Congress has seen all the suffering caused by the unfair and anti-immigration laws of 1996 and just this week the House Judiciary Committee passed the 2002 Due Process Reform Bill. While it still must be passed by the Senate and signed by the President, it is an excellent step in giving back some of the due process rights lost by long term residents who were put in deportation proceedings because of various crimes.

Question: How does this particular bill help me?

Answer: Please note that the Senate might change some of the provisions, or the President might require some alternate items in the bill. However, as the bill stands now, it applies specifically to people who previously had their Green Cards. They were or are going to be placed into deportation or removal proceedings because of a crime they committed. They are considered to be an aggravated felons and do not qualify for the normal Cancellation of Removal.

Question: What is Cancellation of Removal?

Answer: Prior to this bill there was a section of the bill referred to as Cancellation of Removal for Certain Lawful Permanent Residents. Generally, you had to have your Green Card for at least five-years and be physically present in the U.S. for at least seven-years. Finally, and this is the item that disqualified numerous people, is that you cannot be convicted of an aggravated felony.

Question: What does the new bill allow?

Answer: Basically it deals with the Cancellation of Removal for people who have committed aggravated felonies. In the new bill, it expands the Cancellation of Removal so that it allows people whom have been convicted of aggravated felonies to still keep their Green Cards and stay in the U.S. It deals with three different scenarios. First, people who have been convicted of a non violent aggravated felony. Second, people who were convicted of a violent aggravated felony. Finally, people who have been convicted of an aggravated felony and came to the U.S. as a young child. Each of these provisions allows a person to remain in the U.S. and to not be deported if the Judge grants the Cancellation of Removal. Therefore, this is a very big step toward restoring some of the harsh anti-immigrant provisions of the 1996 law. Hopefully, this trend will continue so that families can be reunited and the tearing apart of immigrant families will stop. .

Abstenia deportation

Best deportation lawyer

Deportation proceedings

How to win a deportation

Humanitarian reinstatement keeps I-130 petitions alive after a petitioner’s death, offering hope to beneficiaries.⁣ ⁣ #humanitarianreinstatement⁣ #immigrationpetition⁣ #i130⁣ #petitioner⁣ #immigrationlawyer⁣ #americanimmigration⁣ #undocumentedimmigrants

Humanitarian reinstatement offers relief when the petitioner passes, keeping I-130 petitions alive.⁣ ⁣ #humanitarianreinstatement⁣ #immigrationpetition⁣ #i130⁣ #petitioner⁣ #immigrationlawyer⁣ #americanimmigration⁣ #undocumentedimmigrants

Find out About the H-1B Specialty Occupation Work Visa


via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cB9wQFR4mtA

Find out About the H-1B Specialty Occupation Work Visa


via IFTTT

Title: Employment Based Petitions Just Got Faster

Question: I filed a Labor Certification several years ago and it has just been certified. Now I am told that I must file the I-140 or Employment based petition. Additionally, I am told that only afterwards can I file the Adjustment of Status Petition. I urgently need to work and to leave the U.S., but cannot because it will take a considerable amount of time to process the I-140. Is there anything I can do to speed up the process?

Answer: Yes. You are very fortunate as new regulations were just passed by the Immigration and Naturalization Service which allow concurrent filings in certain situations for the I-140 Employment Petition and the I-485 Adjustment of Status Applications.

Question: Why Is the Service Issuing This Rule?

Answer: This interim rule is necessary to improve both efficiency and customer service, and to support the Service’s long-established goals for filing of petitions and applications via direct mail. Currently, as you are aware, an alien can only submit Form I-485 after the alien has had his or her underlying visa petition, Form I-140, approved, and when an immigrant visa is immediately available. Due to these requirements there has been a delay from the time the Form I-140 is filed with the Service until the alien worker, for whom a visa is otherwise immediately available, can properly file Form I-485 with the Service. The most practical and efficient way to eliminate this delay is to permit concurrent filing of Form I-485 together with Form I-140 in cases in which a visa is immediately available. Concurrent filing eliminates the delay that takes place between approval of Form I-140 and the subsequent filing of Form I-485. This interim rule provides for such concurrent filing.

Question: Does This Interim Rule Change or Amend the Substantive Eligibility Requirements for the Visa Petition or Permanent Residence Applications?

Answer: No, this interim rule does not change the current substantive requirements governing eligibility for and adjudication of the Form I-140 nor for the Form I-485.

Question: Who Is Eligible to File Forms I-140 and I-485 Concurrently?

Answer: Forms I-140 and I-485 may be filed concurrently only when an immigrant visa number is immediately available. This interim rule does not change the existing requirement that a visa number must be immediately available before an alien can apply for permanent resident status.

Question: If a Form I-140 Visa Petition Previously Filed for an Alien Worker Is Still Pending with the Service on or After the Date this Rule was published, and a Visa Number is immediately available, can the alien file Form I-485?

Answer: Yes, upon issuance of this rule, an alien whose Form I-140 visa petition is pending with the Service may file Form I-485, together with associated forms and fees, with the Service office at which the visa petition was filed. When filing Form I-485, the alien will be required to attach a copy of the Form I-797, Notice of Action, establishing previous receipt and acceptance by the Service of the underlying Form I-140 visa petition. When an immigrant visa is immediately available, Form I-485 may be filed either concurrently with the Form I-140 or anytime thereafter.

This is a very nice development from the Immigration and Naturalization Service. It will make both their adjudication more efficient, and persons whom want to work sooner on employment based visas will be able to do so considerably quicker than before.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/employment-based-immigration/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/employment-based-immigration-attorney/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/employment-based-petition/

https://californiaimmigration.us/family-and-employment-based-applicants-on-the-rise

Title:How to Age-out without having to Age-out

Question: My mother filed a petition for me some years back. I will be 21 years old in September of this year. My understanding is that I am now an immediate relative which allows me to come into the U.S. right away when the Visa Number becomes current. However, once I am over 21 years old, I understand that I will move to a different preference and could actually wait over 10 years to be reunited with my mother. Is this true and is there anything I can do?

Answer: First, you are correct in your current assessment of the situation. However, the President of the United States has just signed a bill which will be most beneficial to those who will ‘age-out’. This is a term for a person whom is about to turn 21 years old and not be eligible for ‘immediate relative status’. The new bill is referred to as the Child Status Protection Act.

Question: What exactly is an Immediate Relative and how does this bill help me?

Answer: An Immediate Relative are those relationships that the U.S. Government deems so important that it does not place any numerical limitation on those who qualify and the only waiting someone has to do for this category is processing time. Other than immediate relatives, there are several other types of petitions that people must wait years for the visa number to become current. Examples of immediate relative petitions are spouses of U.S. Citizens, children whom are unmarried and under 21 years old of U.S. Citizens and parents of U.S. Citizens over the age of 21 years old. Normally, the beneficiary must obtain their Green Card BEFORE they turn 21 years old if it is a child.

Now, based upon the Child Protection Status Act, if the petition was filed for a child, the age of the child is determined when the petition is FILED, not when it is approved.

If the petition was filed based upon a Lawful Permanent Resident parent petitioning a child, they must usually wait many years. Once the parent naturalizes and becomes a U.S. Citizen, then an immediate relative petition can be filed. In this new law, the age of the child at the time the parent naturalizes is what determines immediate relative status, not the time at which the petition is approved. Therefore, for you, your mother must see if she qualifies to become a U.S. Citizen, and apply for Naturalization right away. She should try to get it expedited.

If a married son or daughter of a U.S. Citizen gets divorced and the petition is converted to single child under 21 of a U.S. Citizen, the date the married son or daughter gets divorced is the date to determine if he or she is an immediate relative, not the date the converted petition would get approved.

Question: I have a child who is 3 years old. Assuming I qualify for this new law, what about my daughter?

Answer: Fortunately, the new law also takes care of this type of situation. If a spouse or child is not considered to be an immediate relative themselves, they can apply under this new law to join the spouse or parent as in your case.

As you can see, the U.S. Government has taken significant steps toward helping to unify the Family Unity. This is an excellent piece of legislation and hopefully will be used to its fullest extent.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/child-citizenshjip-protection-act/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/child-status-protection-act/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/equal-protection/

https://californiaimmigration.us/family-petitions-to-immigrate-family-members/child-status