The Eleventh Circuit granted the petition for review, finding that because the petitioner had not been confined in a prison but rather had been detained in a rebel-controlled trailer in the jungle, he did not willfully make a material misrepresentation on his application to adjust his status to that of a lawful permanent resident when he answered “no” to Question 17 on his application, and thus he was not removable under INA §237(a)(2)(A)(ii).
Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: 11th circuit, asylum, Fraud, misrepresentation |
Brian D. Lerner Immigration Attorney & Deportation Lawyer Blog 
Leave a comment