The court found that the addition of social visibility and particularity to the BIA’s social group definition is inconsistent with prior decisions and rejected it without a reason for adopting the requirements.
Filed under: asylum | Tagged: asylee, asylum, asylum 2.0, Asylum Applicants, Asylum Application, asylum attorney, asylum officer, asylum petition, Atty.Brian D. Lerner, BIA, CA3, california asylum attorney, frivolous asylum application, Immigration Lawyer, Particularity, Refugee and Asylee follow-to-Join cases, Social Visibility |

Leave a comment