The BIA found that a stepchild who meets the definition of a “child” under INA § 101(b)(1)(B), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(b)(1)(B) (2006), is a qualifying relative for purposes of establishing exceptional and extremely unusual hardship for cancellation of removal under the Act. Matter of Portillo-Gutierrez, 25 I&N Dec. 148 (BIA 2009).
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/appeal-to-bia/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia-board-of-immigration-appeals/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/appeal-to-bia/
https://californiaimmigration.us/bia-remands-case-back-to-the-judge/
Filed under: BIA | Tagged: BIA, bia board of immigration appeals, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, Stepchild |

Leave a comment