DHS lost its bid at the Ninth Circuit to stop preliminary injunctions against a new public charge rule limiting the number of immigrants who can be admitted to the U.S. based on doubts they can be self-sufficient. The court reasoned that the rule is likely not a reasonable interpretation of federal immigration law. Ultimately, the divided court upheld preliminary injunctions against the rule issued by district courts in CA and WA, though it narrowed the WA-based court’s nationwide injunction to cover only the territory within the court’s jurisdiction. The California AG Xavier Becerra called the court’s ruling a “critical victory.”
Split 9th Circ. narrows block of Trump’s public charge rule.
Related Posts
Attorney General erases duress exception for persecutors seeking asylum
AG Barr issued a decision that unwound a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) ruling that allowed persecutors to apply for asylum if they could prove they…
Attorney General Rules That the BIA Must Examine Asylum Claims De Novo
Vacating the BIA’s decision concerning the asylum claims of a Salvadoran woman who had established persecution on account of her membership in a particular social…
Ninth Circuit to Allow Termination of TPS for Sudan, Nicaragua, Haiti, and El Salvador
The Ninth Circuit issued a split panel decision vacating a district court’s preliminary injunction barring implementation of decisions to terminate the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designation of…
The Supreme Court punted an immigration-related case back down to the 9th Circuit.
On May 7, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the 9th Circuit should not have ruled on an immigration-related First Amendment issue, because the issue was not…
Ninth Circuit Defends Asylum in Two Rulings
In Innovation Law Lab v. Wolf, the Ninth Circuit reinstated the previously stayed injunction halting the Remain in Mexico policy. Additionally, in East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trump, the…