A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit found procedural and substantive reasons to block the “asylum ban” while litigation proceeds. The impact of this ruling is low, however, since a federal judge in Washington, D.C. blocked the policy on procedural grounds last week. Additionally, the Trump administration has imposed pandemic-related measures that allow CBP to quickly expel asylum seekers from the U.S.
A federal appeals court ruled to block the asylum ban.
Related Posts
Biden to slowly allow 25,000 people seeking asylum into U.S.
the Biden administration announced plans for those who have been forced to wait in Mexico under the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) to be allowed into…
CA judge says Trump’s final asylum rule violates immigration laws.
On Tuesday, a federal judge in Oakland, CA ruled that the Trump administration violated immigration laws and endangered immigrants when it issued a blanket denial of…
EOIR Final Rule on Appellate Procedures and Administrative Closure
Appellate procedures and administrative closures have changed https://brian-d-lerner-blog.com/tag/9th-circuit-court-of-appeals/ https://brian-d-lerner-blog.com/tag/administrative-appeals-office-aao-2/ https://brian-d-lerner-blog.com/tag/appeals/ https://californiaimmigration.us/bia-remands-case-where-defendant-appeals-in-absentia-order/
Acting Attorney General Issues New Decision in Matter of A—B
The acting attorney general provided additional guidance on asylum cases involving applicants who claim persecution by non-governmental actors and membership in a particular social group and remanded…
Acting Attorney General Issues New Decision in Matter of A—B
The acting attorney general provided additional guidance on asylum cases involving applicants who claim persecution by non-governmental actors and membership in a particular social group and remanded…