On June 8, the Supreme Court announced that it will hear an immigration case on the stop-time rule in its next term. The stop-time rule, which stops the clock on time accrued by the immigrant to become eligible for relief from deportation, is triggered when the government sends the immigrant a “notice to appear” with specific information about the removal proceedings. The specific issue that the Supreme Court will consider is whether all the necessary information must be provided to the immigrant in a single document or if the government can trigger the rule by providing multiple documents. The Supreme Court’s next term starts in October of this year.
Home » Immigration Updates » The Supreme Court has granted a case on the stop-time rule for next term.
The Supreme Court has granted a case on the stop-time rule for next term.
Related Posts
Supreme Court cancels border wall and Remain in Mexico hearings.
the Supreme Court cancelled oral arguments in suits challenging former President Trump’s defense funding for border wall construction and a policy forcing asylum-seekers to wait in Mexico…
Supreme Court Vacates Decision of Ninth Circuit in ICE v. Padilla
The U.S. Supreme Court granted the petition for writ of certiorari, vacated the judgment of the Ninth Circuit, and remanded for further consideration in light of the Supreme…
Supreme Court to review Trump’s asylum policy and use of military funds for border wall.
On Monday, the Supreme Court said it would review cases concerning the Trump administration’s use of Defense Department money to build the border wall and…
It is unclear if the Trump administration will comply with a judicial order to accept new DACA applications.
It is unclear if the Trump administration will comply with a judicial order to accept new DACA applications. Last month, the Supreme Court held that…
The Supreme Court has decided not to hear a challenge to a California sanctuary law.
On June 15, the Supreme Court declined to grant certiorari in a case challenging a California law limiting information-sharing with federal immigration enforcement. Since the 9th Circuit…