In Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam, the U.S. Supreme Court held that restrictions on the ability of asylum seekers to obtain review of expedited removal orders under a federal habeas statute do not violate the Constitution’s suspension clause or due process clause
Home » Immigration Updates » Supreme Court Rules Asylum Seekers Cannot Seek Federal Court Review of Expedited Removal Orders
Supreme Court Rules Asylum Seekers Cannot Seek Federal Court Review of Expedited Removal Orders
Related Posts
Biden to slowly allow 25,000 people seeking asylum into U.S.
the Biden administration announced plans for those who have been forced to wait in Mexico under the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) to be allowed into…
CA judge says Trump’s final asylum rule violates immigration laws.
On Tuesday, a federal judge in Oakland, CA ruled that the Trump administration violated immigration laws and endangered immigrants when it issued a blanket denial of…
The Race to Dismantle Trump’s Immigration Policies
The New Yorker reports on the “extensive, unpublicized bureaucratic effort to transform immigration through rule changes, adjustments to asylum officers’ guidelines, modifications to enforcement norms, and other measures”…
Biden Wasting No Time Naming Officials to Reverse Trump’s Immigration Policies
CNN reports that DHS, which was largely hollowed out over the last four years, is moving with urgency to staff agencies with people who had front-row seats…
DHS Extends Flexibility in Requirements Related to Form I-9 Compliance
DHS Extends Flexibility in Requirements Related to Form I-9 Compliance. https://brian-d-lerner-blog.com/tag/distribution-of-more-than-2-3-million-to-state-and-local-law-enforcement-agencies-in-new-york/ https://californiaimmigration.us/removal/detention-in-deportation-proceedings/ https://brian-d-lerner-blog.com/tag/agencies/ https://brian-d-lerner-blog.com/tag/government-agencies/