On May 7, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the 9th Circuit should not have ruled on an immigration-related First Amendment issue, because the issue was not raised by either parties in the lawsuit. The lawsuit concerns one woman who was convicted of “encouraging” a foreigner to be in the U.S. illegally. Now, the case will go back to the 9th Circuit to be considered on the merits of the other arguments that the parties did raise
Home » Immigration Updates » The Supreme Court punted an immigration-related case back down to the 9th Circuit.
The Supreme Court punted an immigration-related case back down to the 9th Circuit.
Related Posts
Supreme Court cancels border wall and Remain in Mexico hearings.
the Supreme Court cancelled oral arguments in suits challenging former President Trump’s defense funding for border wall construction and a policy forcing asylum-seekers to wait in Mexico…
Supreme Court Vacates Decision of Ninth Circuit in ICE v. Padilla
The U.S. Supreme Court granted the petition for writ of certiorari, vacated the judgment of the Ninth Circuit, and remanded for further consideration in light of the Supreme…
Split 9th Circ. narrows block of Trump’s public charge rule.
DHS lost its bid at the Ninth Circuit to stop preliminary injunctions against a new public charge rule limiting the number of immigrants who can be…
Supreme Court to review Trump’s asylum policy and use of military funds for border wall.
On Monday, the Supreme Court said it would review cases concerning the Trump administration’s use of Defense Department money to build the border wall and…
Ninth Circuit to Allow Termination of TPS for Sudan, Nicaragua, Haiti, and El Salvador
The Ninth Circuit issued a split panel decision vacating a district court’s preliminary injunction barring implementation of decisions to terminate the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designation of…