The Ninth Circuit granted rehearing en banc to revisit its prior decision filed on May 22, 2019, which held that a Notice to Appear that is defective under Pereira v. Sessions cannot be cured by a subsequent Notice of Hearing and therefore does not terminate the residence period required for cancellation of removal.
Home » Immigration Updates » Ninth Circuit Grants Rehearing En Banc in Case Involving Defective NTA Under Pereira
Ninth Circuit Grants Rehearing En Banc in Case Involving Defective NTA Under Pereira
Related Posts
BIA Finds Subsequent NTA Perfects Deficient NTA and Ends Accrual of Physical Presence for Purposes of Voluntary Departure
the BIA ruled that if an NTA fails to specify the time/place of an initial removal hearing, a subsequent NTA with the information perfects the deficient NTA…
New Case on the issuance of an NTA
The absence of a checked alien classification box on a Notice to Appear (Form I-862) does not, by itself, render the notice to appear fatally…
BIA Rules That Absence of a Checked Alien Classification Box Does Not Render an NTA Fatally Deficient
The BIA ruled that the absence of a checked alien classification box on a Notice to Appear (NTA) does not, by itself, render an NTA fatally…
Court Says Stop-Time Rule Is Triggered by One Complete NTA, Not a Combination of Documents
Granting the petition for review, the 10th Circuit held that, given the unambiguous statutory language for the stop-time rule and Notices to Appear (NTAs), the stop-time rule…
Third Circuit Says Defective NTA Cannot Be Cured by Subsequent Notice of Hearing Containing Omitted Information
The court held that the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Pereira v. Sessions abrogated the Third Circuit’s decision in Orozco-Velasquez v. Attorney General, and thus found that, for purposes…