The court rejected Petitioner’s argument that the 3-page opinion issued by a single BIA member could only have been appropriately rendered by a 3-member panel, and that 8 CFR §1003.1 clearly allows a single member to issue such an opinion. (Ward v. Holder, 1/21/11)
Tags:BIABrian D. LernerImmigration AttorneyImmigration LawyerLaw Offices of Brian D. LernerThree (3) Member Panel
Home » Immigration Updates » Court rejected Petitioner’s argument
Court rejected Petitioner’s argument
Related Posts
Circuit Court Strikes Down Matter of S-O-G- & F-D-B-
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling in Chavez Gonzalez v. Garland, which repealed Matter of S-O-G- & F-D-B-, holding that the Attorney…
EOIR Announces Appointment of 24 New Immigration Judges
EOIR announced the appointment of 24 new immigration judges, including four Assistant Chief Immigration Judges and two Unit Chief Immigration Judges. The memo provides a…
BIA Finds IJs and the Board Lack Authority to Recognize the Equitable Defense of Laches in Removal Proceedings
The BIA found the respondent did not submit sufficient objective evidence to support his fear of torture by the Rwandan government and that immigration judges…
BIA Remands for IJ to Determine Qualification for “Simple Possession” Exception
The BIA sustained the appeal and remanded to allow the immigration judge (IJ) to evaluate if the respondent qualifies for the “simple possession” exception to…
USCIS Will Now Provide Self-Service Kiosks for BIA and EOIR Payments
USCIS announced that, as of June 2021, it will allow attorneys and accredited representatives to use self-service kiosks in USCIS field offices to pay the…